D'Angelo Maria C, Thomson David R, Tipper Steven P, Milliken Bruce
a Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest , Toronto , ON , Canada.
b Department of Psychology , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct;69(10):1890-909. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1173077. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
In this article, three generations of authors describe the background to the original article; the subsequent emergence of vigorous debates concerning what negative priming actually reflects, where radically different accounts based on memory retrieval were proposed; and a re-casting of the conceptual issues underlying studies of negative priming. What started as a simple observation (slowed reaction times) and mechanism (distractor inhibition) appears now to be best explained by a multiple mechanism account involving both episodic binding and retrieval processes as well as an inhibitory process. Emerging evidence from converging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and especially electroencephalography (EEG), is beginning to identify these different processes. The past 30 years of negative priming experiments has revealed the dynamic and complex cognitive processes that mediate what appear to be apparently simple behavioural effects.
在本文中,三代作者描述了原始文章的背景;随后出现了关于负启动效应实际反映了什么的激烈争论,其中提出了基于记忆检索的截然不同的解释;以及对负启动效应研究背后概念问题的重新阐述。最初作为一个简单观察结果(反应时间变慢)和机制(干扰抑制)出现的现象,现在似乎最好用一个涉及情景绑定、检索过程以及抑制过程的多重机制解释来解释。来自功能磁共振成像(fMRI)等多种技术,尤其是脑电图(EEG)的越来越多的证据,开始识别这些不同的过程。过去30年的负启动效应实验揭示了介导看似简单行为效应的动态且复杂的认知过程。