• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FAMCARE量表的意大利语版本:一项效度研究。

The Italian version of the FAMCARE scale: a validation study.

作者信息

Chattat Rabih, Ottoboni Giovanni, Zeneli Anita, Berardi Maria Alejandra, Cossu Veronica, Maltoni Marco

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy.

Nursing Service, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2016 Sep;24(9):3821-30. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3187-1. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-016-3187-1
PMID:27067593
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluation of the quality of care is a key element that healthcare providers now take into consideration to meet patients' needs, expectations, and values. The FAMCARE scale is one of the most important instruments available to assess the level of satisfaction about care received by patients and families. We describe the validation process used to develop an Italian version (IF) of the original FAMCARE scale for caregivers.

METHODS

The IF was prepared according to standard guidelines for translation and transcultural adaptation of self-reported measures. The scale was self-administered to 132 informal caregivers of patients with cancer treated with curative and/or palliative care in a hospice, outpatient, or inpatient setting for at least 1 month. The participant group was composed of spouses (47.73 %), children (31.82 %), siblings (3.03 %), or other relatives (17.42 %). All participants simultaneously completed the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire to test the construct validity. Twenty-two percent of randomly chosen participants re-completed the test after 1 month to evaluate IF test-retest stability.

RESULTS

The IF showed a strong reliability with internal consistency [α = 0.93, confidence intervals (CI) = 0.91-0.95] and test-retest stability (Pearson r = 0.38; Kendall's tau-b = 0,25; Spearman's rho =0.34). Factor analysis identified four factors capable of explaining the 63 % total variance which did not change after the Varimax normalized rotation. Notwithstanding the lack of correlation with the VAS component of the EQ-5D questionnaire, our results highlighted robust psychometric properties of the IF.

CONCLUSIONS

IF is a valid translation of the FAMCARE scale and can be used to assess caregiver satisfaction within the Italian context of cancer palliative care.

摘要

目的

评估医疗质量是医疗服务提供者如今为满足患者需求、期望和价值观而考虑的关键要素。FAMCARE量表是用于评估患者及其家属对所接受护理满意度水平的最重要工具之一。我们描述了用于开发适用于照护者的原始FAMCARE量表意大利语版本(IF)的验证过程。

方法

IF是根据自我报告测量工具的翻译和跨文化调适标准指南编制的。该量表由132名在临终关怀机构、门诊或住院环境中接受了至少1个月的根治性和/或姑息性治疗的癌症患者的非正式照护者自行填写。参与者群体包括配偶(47.73%)、子女(31.82%)、兄弟姐妹(3.03%)或其他亲属(17.42%)。所有参与者同时完成欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)问卷以测试结构效度。22%随机选择的参与者在1个月后重新完成测试以评估IF的重测稳定性。

结果

IF显示出很强的可靠性,内部一致性[α = 0.93,置信区间(CI)= 0.91 - 0.95]和重测稳定性(Pearson相关系数r = 0.38;Kendall's tau-b = 0.25;Spearman's rho = 0.34)。因子分析确定了四个能够解释63%总方差的因子,在方差最大化正交旋转后这些因子没有变化。尽管与EQ-5D问卷的视觉模拟量表(VAS)部分缺乏相关性,但我们的结果突出了IF强大的心理测量特性。

结论

IF是FAMCARE量表的有效翻译版本,可用于评估意大利癌症姑息治疗背景下照护者的满意度。

相似文献

1
The Italian version of the FAMCARE scale: a validation study.FAMCARE量表的意大利语版本:一项效度研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Sep;24(9):3821-30. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3187-1. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
2
Translation and Validation of the 10-Item FAMCARE Scale to Assess Satisfaction of Family Caregivers With Care Given to Cancer Patients.将 10 项 FAMCARE 量表翻译并验证为评估癌症患者家庭护理者对所提供护理的满意度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):878-885.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
3
Translation and Testing of the Italian Version of FAMCARE-2: Measuring Family Caregivers' Satisfaction With Palliative Care.FAMCARE-2 意大利版的翻译与测试:测量姑息治疗中家庭护理者的满意度。
J Fam Nurs. 2017 May;23(2):252-272. doi: 10.1177/1074840717697538. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
4
A new Italian questionnaire to assess caregivers of cancer patients' satisfaction with palliative care: multicenter validation of the post mortem questionnaire-short form.一份用于评估癌症患者照护者对姑息治疗满意度的全新意大利问卷:验尸后问卷简表的多中心验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
5
The FAMCARE-Patient scale: measuring satisfaction with care of outpatients with advanced cancer.FAMCARE-患者量表:测量晚期癌症门诊患者对护理的满意度。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Dec;45(18):3182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Patients' Satisfaction Instrument FAMCARE-P13 in a Palliative Care Unit.姑息治疗病房中患者满意度量表FAMCARE-P13的心理测量学特性
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Aug;34(7):597-602. doi: 10.1177/1049909116645511. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
7
Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6.照顾者对门诊肿瘤服务的满意度:FAMCARE 工具的效用和 FAMCARE-6 的开发。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0858-1. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
8
Psychometric properties and relations with coping and family strain of the Health Services and Caregiver Experience questionnaire (HSCE): an outcome measure of informal caregivers' experience for inpatient care in Italy.健康服务与照顾者体验问卷(HSCE)的心理测量特性及其与应对方式和家庭压力的关系:意大利住院护理中非正式照顾者体验的一项结果测量指标
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2317-x.
9
Reliability and Validity Testing of the FAMCARE-2 Scale: Thai Translation.FAMCARE-2量表的信效度检验:泰语翻译
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 May 15;7(3):280-286. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_5_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
10
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the quality of patient-provider relationships in serious illness: A scoping review.衡量重症患者与医疗服务提供者关系的质量:一项范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):332-345. doi: 10.1177/02692163251315304. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
2
Practices for Reporting Scale Structure and Summarizing Scores in Studies Using FAMCARE Scale to Assess Caregiver Satisfaction with Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.使用FAMCARE量表评估照顾者对癌症护理满意度的研究中报告量表结构和总结分数的实践:一项范围综述
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Nov 8;15:271-286. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S479195. eCollection 2024.
3
Factorial structure of quality of life, satisfaction with caregiving and caregiver burden in palliative care: A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and cultural adaptation of research instruments - guidelines and challenges: an example in FAMCARE-2 for use in Sweden.研究工具的翻译与文化调适——指南与挑战:以瑞典使用的FAMCARE-2为例
Inform Health Soc Care. 2015 Jan;40(1):67-78. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2013.872111. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
2
Satisfaction with care as a quality-of-life predictor for stroke patients and their caregivers.将照顾的满意度作为中风患者及其照顾者的生活质量预测指标。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Dec;21(10):1719-25. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0107-1. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
3
The lack of standard definitions in the supportive and palliative oncology literature.
在姑息治疗中,生活质量、护理满意度和护理者负担的因子结构:系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2067. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2067.
4
Outpatient palliative care referral system (PCRS) for patients with advanced cancer: an impact evaluation protocol.晚期癌症患者的门诊姑息治疗转介系统(PCRS):影响评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e059410. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059410.
5
Australian public hospital inpatient satisfaction related to early patient involvement and shared decision-making in discharge planning.澳大利亚公立医院住院患者满意度与早期患者参与和出院计划中的共同决策相关。
Intern Med J. 2021 Jun;51(6):891-895. doi: 10.1111/imj.14872.
6
A cross-sectional evaluation of the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patient satisfaction and quality of life with a care coordinator.对特发性肺纤维化患者在护理协调员协助下的满意度和生活质量进行的横断面评估。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5547-5556. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.41.
7
Systematic vs. on-demand early palliative care in gastric cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial assessing patient and healthcare service outcomes.系统与按需早期姑息治疗胃癌患者的随机临床试验:评估患者和医疗服务结局。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jul;27(7):2425-2434. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4517-2. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
支持治疗与姑息治疗肿瘤学文献中缺乏标准定义。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Mar;43(3):582-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
4
Patients, family caregivers, and patient navigators: a partnership approach.患者、家属护理人员和患者导航员:一种伙伴关系方法。
Cancer. 2011 Aug;117(15 Suppl):3592-3602. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26263.
5
A psychometric validation study of the Quality of Life and FAMCARE scales in Turkish cancer family caregivers.土耳其癌症患者家庭照顾者生活质量和 FAMCARE 量表的心理计量学验证研究。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Oct;20(8):1319-29. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9867-x. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
6
Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6.照顾者对门诊肿瘤服务的满意度:FAMCARE 工具的效用和 FAMCARE-6 的开发。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0858-1. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
7
Factor analysis and internal consistency evaluation of the FAMCARE scale for use in the long-term care setting.家庭关怀评估量表在长期护理环境中的因子分析及内部一致性评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2010 Jun;8(2):169-76. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990927. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
8
A strategy for health care reform--toward a value-based system.医疗保健改革策略——迈向基于价值的体系。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 9;361(2):109-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904131. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
9
Assessing the construct validity of the Italian version of the EQ-5D: preliminary results from a cross-sectional study in North Italy.评估意大利语版EQ-5D的结构效度:来自意大利北部一项横断面研究的初步结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 10;4:47. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-47.
10
Relationship between three palliative care outcome scales.三种姑息治疗结局量表之间的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Nov 29;2:68. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-68.