Suppr超能文献

使用基于叙事的信息手册降低国民保健服务体系(NHS)结直肠癌筛查项目参与率的社会梯度差异:一项整群随机试验

Reducing the Social Gradient in Uptake of the NHS Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Using a Narrative-Based Information Leaflet: A Cluster-Randomised Trial.

作者信息

McGregor Lesley M, von Wagner Christian, Atkin Wendy, Kralj-Hans Ines, Halloran Stephen P, Handley Graham, Logan Richard F, Rainbow Sandra, Smith Steve, Snowball Julia, Thomas Mary C, Smith Samuel G, Vart Gemma, Howe Rosemary, Counsell Nicholas, Hackshaw Allan, Morris Stephen, Duffy Stephen W, Raine Rosalind, Wardle Jane

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:3670150. doi: 10.1155/2016/3670150. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Abstract

Objective. To test the effectiveness of adding a narrative leaflet to the current information material delivered by the NHS English colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme on reducing socioeconomic inequalities in uptake. Participants. 150,417 adults (59-74 years) routinely invited to complete the guaiac Faecal Occult Blood test (gFOBt) in March 2013. Design. A cluster randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN74121020) to compare uptake between two arms. The control arm received the standard NHS CRC screening information material (SI) and the intervention arm received the standard information plus a supplementary narrative leaflet, which had previously been shown to increase screening intentions (SI + N). Between group comparisons were made for uptake overall and across socioeconomic status (SES). Results. Uptake was 57.7% and did not differ significantly between the two trial arms (SI: 58.5%; SI + N: 56.7%; odds ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.06; p = 0.27). There was no interaction between group and SES quintile (p = 0.44). Conclusions. Adding a narrative leaflet to existing information materials does not reduce the SES gradient in uptake. Despite the benefits of using a pragmatic trial design, the need to add to, rather than replace, existing information may have limited the true value of an evidence-based intervention on behaviour.

摘要

目的。测试在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)英语结直肠癌(CRC)筛查项目提供的现有信息材料中增加一份叙述性传单,对减少接受筛查方面的社会经济不平等现象的有效性。参与者。2013年3月常规受邀完成愈创木脂粪便潜血试验(gFOBt)的150417名成年人(59 - 74岁)。设计。一项整群随机对照试验(ISRCTN74121020),比较两组的接受率。对照组接受标准的NHS CRC筛查信息材料(SI),干预组接受标准信息外加一份补充叙述性传单,该传单先前已被证明能提高筛查意愿(SI + N)。对总体接受率以及不同社会经济地位(SES)的接受率进行组间比较。结果。接受率为57.7%,两个试验组之间无显著差异(SI组:58.5%;SI + N组:56.7%;优势比 = 0.93;95%置信区间:0.81 - 1.06;p = 0.27)。组与SES五分位数之间无交互作用(p = 0.44)。结论。在现有信息材料中增加一份叙述性传单并不能降低接受率方面的SES梯度。尽管采用务实的试验设计有诸多益处,但在现有信息基础上进行补充而非替换的必要性,可能限制了基于证据的行为干预的真正价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验