Petersen Inge, Evans-Lacko Sara, Semrau Maya, Barry Margaret M, Chisholm Dan, Gronholm Petra, Egbe Catherine O, Thornicroft Graham
Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health and School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Apr 11;10:30. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z. eCollection 2016.
In addition to services within the health system, interventions at the population and community levels are also important for the promotion of mental health, primary prevention of mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders, identification and case detection of MNS disorders; and to a lesser degree treatment, care and rehabilitation. This study aims to identify "best practice" and "good practice" interventions that can feasibly be delivered at these population- and community-levels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to aid the identification of resource efficiencies and allocation in LMICs.
A narrative review was conducted given the wide range of relevant interventions. Expert consensus was used to identify "best practice" at the population-level on the basis of existing quasi-experimental natural experiments and cost effectiveness, with small scale emerging and promising evidence comprising "good practice". At the community-level, using expert consensus, the ACE (Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention Project) grading system was used to differentiate "best practice" interventions with sufficient evidence from "good practice" interventions with limited but promising evidence.
At the population-level, laws and regulations to control alcohol demand and restrict access to lethal means of suicide were considered "best practice". Child protection laws, improved control of neurocysticercosis and mass awareness campaigns were identified as "good practice". At the community level, socio-emotional learning programmes in schools and parenting programmes during infancy were identified as "best practice". The following were all identified as "good practice": Integrating mental health promotion strategies into workplace occupational health and safety policies; mental health information and awareness programmes as well as detection of MNS disorders in schools; early child enrichment/preschool educational programs and parenting programs for children aged 2-14 years; gender equity and/or economic empowerment programs for vulnerable groups; training of gatekeepers to identify people with MNS disorders in the community; and training non-specialist community members at a neighbourhood level to assist with community-based support and rehabilitation of people with mental disorders.
Interventions provided at the population- and community-levels have an important role to play in promoting mental health, preventing the onset, and protecting those with MNS disorders. The importance of inter-sectoral engagement and the need for further research on interventions at these levels in LMICs is highlighted.
除卫生系统内的服务外,在人群和社区层面开展干预措施对于促进心理健康、对精神、神经和物质使用(MNS)障碍进行一级预防、识别和发现MNS障碍,以及在较小程度上进行治疗、护理和康复也很重要。本研究旨在确定在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的这些人群和社区层面可行实施的“最佳实践”和“良好实践”干预措施,以帮助确定LMIC中的资源效率和分配情况。
鉴于相关干预措施范围广泛,进行了一项叙述性综述。基于现有的准实验性自然实验和成本效益,利用专家共识确定人群层面的“最佳实践”,小规模的新出现且有前景的证据则构成“良好实践”。在社区层面,利用专家共识,采用预防项目成本效益评估(ACE)分级系统区分有充分证据的“最佳实践”干预措施和证据有限但有前景的“良好实践”干预措施。
在人群层面,控制酒精需求和限制获取自杀致死手段的法律法规被视为“最佳实践”。儿童保护法、改善神经囊尾蚴病控制和大规模宣传运动被确定为“良好实践”。在社区层面,学校的社会情感学习项目和婴儿期的育儿项目被确定为“最佳实践”。以下均被确定为“良好实践”:将心理健康促进策略纳入工作场所职业健康与安全政策;学校中的心理健康信息和宣传项目以及MNS障碍检测;幼儿充实/学前教育项目和针对2至14岁儿童的育儿项目;针对弱势群体的性别平等和/或经济赋权项目;培训守门人以识别社区中患有MNS障碍的人;以及在邻里层面培训非专业社区成员以协助对精神障碍患者进行社区支持和康复。
在人群和社区层面提供的干预措施在促进心理健康、预防发病以及保护患有MNS障碍的人方面发挥着重要作用。强调了部门间合作的重要性以及对LMIC中这些层面干预措施进行进一步研究的必要性。