Suppr超能文献

关节软骨再生中的干细胞。

Stem cells in articular cartilage regeneration.

作者信息

Filardo Giuseppe, Perdisa Francesco, Roffi Alice, Marcacci Maurilio, Kon Elizaveta

机构信息

II Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.

Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Apr 12;11:42. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0378-x.

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising option to treat articular defects and early osteoarthritis (OA) stages. However, both their potential and limitations for a clinical use remain controversial. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to examine MSCs treatment strategies in clinical settings, in order to summarize the current evidence of their efficacy for the treatment of cartilage lesions and OA.Among the 60 selected studies, 7 were randomized, 13 comparative, 31 case series, and 9 case reports; 26 studies reported the results after injective administration, whereas 33 used surgical implantation. One study compared the two different modalities. With regard to the cell source, 20 studies concerned BMSCs, 17 ADSCs, 16 BMC, 5 PBSCs, 1 SDSCs, and 1 compared BMC versus PBSCs. Overall, despite the increasing literature on this topic, the evidence is still limited, in particular for high-level studies. On the other hand, the available studies allow to draw some indications. First, no major adverse events related to the treatment or to the cell harvest have been reported. Second, a clinical benefit of using MSCs therapies has been reported in most of the studies, regardless of cell source, indication, or administration method. This effectiveness has been reflected by clinical improvements and also positive MRI and macroscopic findings, whereas histologic features gave more controversial results among different studies. Third, young age, lower BMI, smaller lesion size for focal lesions, and earlier stages of OA joints have been shown to correlate with better outcomes, even though the available data strength does not allow to define clear cutoff values. Finally, definite trends can be observed with regard to the delivery method: currently cultured cells are mostly being administered by i.a. injection, while one-step surgical implantation is preferred for cell concentrates. In conclusion, while promising results have been shown, the potential of these treatments should be confirmed by reliable clinical data through double-blind, controlled, prospective and multicenter studies with longer follow-up, and specific studies should be designed to identify the best cell sources, manipulation, and delivery techniques, as well as pathology and disease phase indications.

摘要

间充质干细胞(MSCs)已成为治疗关节缺损和早期骨关节炎(OA)阶段的一种有前景的选择。然而,其临床应用的潜力和局限性仍存在争议。因此,本系统评价的目的是研究临床环境中间充质干细胞的治疗策略,以总结其治疗软骨损伤和骨关节炎疗效的当前证据。在所选的60项研究中,7项为随机对照研究,13项为比较研究,31项为病例系列研究,9项为病例报告;26项研究报告了注射给药后的结果,而33项研究采用手术植入。一项研究比较了两种不同的方式。关于细胞来源,20项研究涉及骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSCs),17项涉及脂肪间充质干细胞(ADSCs),16项涉及骨髓细胞(BMC),5项涉及外周血干细胞(PBSCs),1项涉及滑膜间充质干细胞(SDSCs),1项比较了骨髓细胞与外周血干细胞。总体而言,尽管关于该主题的文献不断增加,但证据仍然有限,尤其是对于高水平研究。另一方面,现有研究可以得出一些启示。首先,尚未报告与治疗或细胞采集相关的重大不良事件。其次,大多数研究报告了使用间充质干细胞疗法的临床益处,无论细胞来源、适应症或给药方法如何。这种有效性体现在临床改善以及MRI和宏观检查结果呈阳性,而组织学特征在不同研究中给出了更具争议性的结果。第三,已表明年轻、较低的体重指数、局灶性病变较小的病变尺寸以及OA关节的早期阶段与更好的结果相关,尽管现有数据强度不允许确定明确的临界值。最后,在给药方式方面可以观察到明确的趋势:目前培养的细胞大多通过关节内注射给药,而细胞浓缩物则首选一步手术植入。总之,虽然已显示出有前景的结果,但这些治疗的潜力应通过双盲、对照、前瞻性和多中心研究以及更长时间的随访,由可靠的临床数据来证实,并且应设计特定的研究来确定最佳的细胞来源、操作和给药技术,以及病理学和疾病阶段适应症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef77/4830073/d29ea2cb55b4/13018_2016_378_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验