• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前血清肿瘤标志物的预测和预后价值在可切除的非小细胞肺癌中具有表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变特异性。

Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers is EGFR mutation-specific in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Jiang Richeng, Wang Xinyue, Li Kai

机构信息

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China.

Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, PR China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2016 May 3;7(18):26823-36. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8662.

DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.8662
PMID:27072585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5042017/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The predictive and prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragments (Cyfra21-1), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has been investigated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, few studies have directly focused on the association between these markers and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status or mutation subtypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1016 patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC who underwent complete resection between 2008 and 2012. Correlations between serum tumor marker levels and EGFR mutations and survival parameters were analyzed and prognostic factors were identified.

RESULTS

Cyfra21-1 levels (P = 0.032 for disease-free survival [DFS]; P < 0.001 for overall survival [OS]) and clinical stage were identified as independent predictive and prognostic factors in EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma patients. CEA levels (P < 0.001 for DFS; P = 0.002 for OS) and clinical stage were independently predictive and prognostic in EGFR wild-type adenocarcinoma patients. Further stratification analysis revealed that in EGFR exon 19 deletion adenocarcinomas, elevated Cyfra21-1 was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002). Within the Leu858Arg substitution subgroup, increased CEA (P = 0.005) and clinical stage were predictive factors of DFS, while elevated CEA (P = 0.005) and Cyfra21-1 (P = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyfra21-1 and CEA exhibit different predictive and prognostic values between EGFR-mutated and wild-type adenocarcinomas, as well as between EGFR mutation subtypes. The prognostic impact of preoperative serum tumor markers should be evaluated together with EGFR mutation status.

摘要

背景

癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(Cyfra21-1)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCA)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的预测和预后价值已得到研究。然而,很少有研究直接关注这些标志物与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态或突变亚型之间的关联。

患者与方法

我们回顾性分析了2008年至2012年间接受根治性手术的1016例I-IIIA期NSCLC患者。分析血清肿瘤标志物水平与EGFR突变及生存参数之间的相关性,并确定预后因素。

结果

Cyfra21-1水平(无病生存期[DFS],P = 0.032;总生存期[OS],P < 0.001)和临床分期被确定为EGFR突变腺癌患者的独立预测和预后因素。CEA水平(DFS,P < 0.001;OS,P = 0.002)和临床分期在EGFR野生型腺癌患者中具有独立的预测和预后价值。进一步的分层分析显示,在EGFR外显子19缺失腺癌中,Cyfra21-1升高是独立的预后因素(P = 0.002)。在Leu858Arg替代亚组中,CEA升高(P = 0.005)和临床分期是DFS的预测因素,而CEA升高(P = 0.005)和Cyfra21-1升高(P = 0.027)是独立的预后因素。

结论

Cyfra21-1和CEA在EGFR突变型和野生型腺癌之间以及EGFR突变亚型之间表现出不同的预测和预后价值。术前血清肿瘤标志物的预后影响应与EGFR突变状态一起评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2937/5042017/04fc20fe721b/oncotarget-07-26823-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2937/5042017/3668c5f3c200/oncotarget-07-26823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2937/5042017/04fc20fe721b/oncotarget-07-26823-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2937/5042017/3668c5f3c200/oncotarget-07-26823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2937/5042017/04fc20fe721b/oncotarget-07-26823-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers is EGFR mutation-specific in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.术前血清肿瘤标志物的预测和预后价值在可切除的非小细胞肺癌中具有表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变特异性。
Oncotarget. 2016 May 3;7(18):26823-36. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8662.
2
[Serum CYFRA21-1 is Correlated with the Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring EGFR Mutations].[血清细胞角蛋白19片段21-1与表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对携带EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效相关]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2016 Aug 20;19(8):550-8. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2016.08.12.
3
Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA21-1 in patients with pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer.癌胚抗原和细胞角蛋白19片段在Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者中的预后价值
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep;32(3):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
4
[Variations in Serum CEA and CYFRA21-1 Levels Before and After Surgery Facilitate Prognosis of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients].[血清癌胚抗原和细胞角蛋白19片段水平在手术前后的变化对非小细胞肺癌患者预后的影响]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;18(6):358-64. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2015.06.05.
5
The relationship between Glasgow Prognostic Score and serum tumor markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.格拉斯哥预后评分与晚期非小细胞肺癌患者血清肿瘤标志物的关系。
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 10;15:386. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1403-x.
6
The important role of circulating CYFRA21-1 in metastasis diagnosis and prognostic value compared with carcinoembryonic antigen and neuron-specific enolase in lung cancer patients.循环CYFRA21-1在肺癌患者转移诊断中的重要作用及其与癌胚抗原和神经元特异性烯醇化酶相比的预后价值。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3070-6.
7
The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Combination of Tumor M2-Pyruvate Kinase, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Cytokeratin 19 Fragment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.肿瘤 M2 丙酮酸激酶、癌胚抗原和细胞角蛋白 19 片段联合检测对非小细胞肺癌的诊断和预后价值。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241265983. doi: 10.1177/15330338241265983.
8
Thymidine kinase 1 combined with CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE improved its diagnostic value for lung cancer.胸苷激酶1联合癌胚抗原、细胞角蛋白19片段和神经元特异性烯醇化酶可提高其对肺癌的诊断价值。
Life Sci. 2018 Feb 1;194:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.12.020. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
The prognostic values of CA125, CA19.9, NSE, AND SCC for stage I NSCLC are limited.CA125、CA19.9、NSE 和 SCC 对 I 期非小细胞肺癌的预后价值有限。
Cancer Biomark. 2011;10(3-4):155-62. doi: 10.3233/CBM-2012-0246.
10
Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in resectable adenosqamous lung carcinoma.术前血清肿瘤标志物在可切除腺鳞癌中的预测和预后价值
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 4;7(40):64798-64809. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11703.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression and EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.非小细胞肺癌中癌胚抗原(CEA)表达与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的相关性:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Apr;26(4):991-1000. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03339-7. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
Prognostic evaluation of preoperative serum tumor marker-negative cases in non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.术前血清肿瘤标志物阴性的非小细胞肺癌患者预后评估:一项回顾性研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;6(2):e1696. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1696. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Association between squamous cell carcinoma antigen level and EGFR mutation status in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Overall survival benefits of first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂用于EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的总生存获益:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Br J Cancer. 2015 Nov 17;113(10):1519-28. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.356. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
2
A decade of EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutated non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Old successes and future perspectives.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中十年的EGFR抑制:既往成就与未来展望
Oncotarget. 2015 Sep 29;6(29):26814-25. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4254.
3
鳞状细胞癌抗原水平与中国肺腺癌患者表皮生长因子受体突变状态的关系。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Sep;36(9):e24613. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24613. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
Establishment and Evaluation of EGFR Mutation Prediction Model Based on Tumor Markers and CT Features in NSCLC.基于肿瘤标志物和 CT 特征的 NSCLC 中 EGFR 突变预测模型的建立与评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Apr 5;2022:8089750. doi: 10.1155/2022/8089750. eCollection 2022.
5
Clinicopathologic Features and Molecular Biomarkers as Predictors of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体基因突变的临床病理特征及分子标志物预测。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Dec 24;29(1):77-93. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29010007.
6
Prognostic value of the immunohistochemistry markers CD56, TTF-1, synaptophysin, CEA, EMA and NSE in surgically resected lung carcinoid tumors.免疫组化标志物CD56、TTF-1、突触素、癌胚抗原、上皮膜抗原和神经元特异性烯醇化酶在手术切除的肺类癌肿瘤中的预后价值
Mol Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;16(2):31. doi: 10.3892/mco.2021.2464. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
Radiomic Feature-Based Nomogram: A Novel Technique to Predict EGFR-Activating Mutations for EGFR Tyrosin Kinase Inhibitor Therapy.基于影像组学特征的列线图:一种预测表皮生长因子受体激活突变以指导表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的新技术。
Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 6;11:590937. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.590937. eCollection 2021.
8
Correlation analysis between serum neuron-specific enolase and the detection of gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶与肺腺癌基因突变检测的相关性分析
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):552-561. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1633.
9
The relationship between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病与非小细胞肺癌的关系。
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(9):4124-4134. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2333. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
10
Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic applications of CYFRA 21-1 in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.头颈部癌症中细胞角蛋白 19 片段 21-1 的诊断准确性和预后应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216561. eCollection 2019.
CEA serum level as early predictive marker of outcome during EGFR-TKI therapy in advanced NSCLC patients.
癌胚抗原血清水平作为晚期非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗期间预后的早期预测标志物。
Tumour Biol. 2015 Aug;36(8):5943-51. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3269-6. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
4
Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials.阿法替尼对比基于顺铂的化疗用于 EGFR 突变阳性肺腺癌(LUX-Lung 3 和 LUX-Lung 6):两项随机、III 期临床试验总生存数据的分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71173-8. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
5
Correlation between efficacy of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and serum tumor markers in lung adenocarcinoma patients.肺腺癌患者中表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂疗效与血清肿瘤标志物的相关性
Clin Lab. 2014;60(9):1439-47. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.131002.
6
Patients with exon 19 deletion were associated with longer progression-free survival compared to those with L858R mutation after first-line EGFR-TKIs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.一线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌后,与携带L858R突变的患者相比,外显子19缺失的患者无进展生存期更长:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 15;9(9):e107161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107161. eCollection 2014.
7
Correlation between EGFR mutation status and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中表皮生长因子受体突变状态与一线铂类化疗反应的相关性。
Onco Targets Ther. 2014 Jul 1;7:1185-93. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S63665. eCollection 2014.
8
Should EGFR mutations be tested in advanced lung squamous cell carcinomas to guide frontline treatment?在晚期肺鳞状细胞癌中是否应该检测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变以指导一线治疗?
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;74(4):661-5. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2536-3. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Prognostic significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.术前血清癌胚抗原在非小细胞肺癌中的预后意义:一项荟萃分析
Tumour Biol. 2014 Oct;35(10):10105-10. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2301-6. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
10
Predictive role of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with erlotinib.CEA 和 CYFRA 21-1 对晚期 NSCLC 患者厄洛替尼治疗的预测作用。
Anticancer Res. 2014 Jun;34(6):3205-10.