Vinson Ebony S, Abdullah Tahirah, Brown Tamara L
*Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; †Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA; and ‡College Of Juvenile Justice and Psychology, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 May;204(5):400-3. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000458.
Stigma surrounding mental illness and mental health treatment remains a significant problem, particularly among African Americans. This study sought to examine the effects of 2 intervention delivery methods in reducing reported stigma. African Americans (n = 158) were nonrandomly assigned to an in-person contact or video condition and administered a survey immediately before, after, and 2 weeks following the stigma intervention. The in vivo contact condition consisted of an African American man discussing his experiences with mental illness and psychotherapy. The session was recorded, and the recording was used for the video condition. There were no significant effects based on delivery method; however, there was a significant effect for time on stigma and help-seeking attitude measures. Further research is needed to determine the overall effectiveness of the intervention.
围绕精神疾病和心理健康治疗的污名化仍然是一个重大问题,尤其是在非裔美国人当中。本研究旨在检验两种干预实施方法在减少所报告的污名化方面的效果。非裔美国人(n = 158)被非随机分配到面对面接触组或视频组,并在污名干预之前、之后以及干预后两周进行问卷调查。面对面接触组是由一名非裔美国男子讲述他患精神疾病及接受心理治疗的经历。该环节被录制下来,录像用于视频组。基于实施方法未发现显著效果;然而,时间对污名化和求助态度测量有显著影响。需要进一步研究以确定该干预的整体效果。