Koch Rebecca E, Wilson Alan E, Hill Geoffrey E
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2016 Jan-Feb;89(1):61-71. doi: 10.1086/684485. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
Carotenoid coloration is the one of the most frequently studied ornamental traits in animals. Many studies of carotenoid coloration test the associations between carotenoid coloration and measures of performance, such as immunocompetence and oxidative state, proceeding from the premise that carotenoids are limited resources. Such studies commonly involve supplementing the diets of captive birds with carotenoids. In many cases, however, the amount of carotenoid administered is poorly justified, and even supposedly carotenoid-limited diets may saturate birds' systems. To quantify the relationships among the amount of carotenoids administered in experiments, levels of circulating carotenoids, and quantities of carotenoids deposited into colored ornaments, we performed a meta-analysis of 15 published studies that supplemented carotenoids to one of seven songbird species. We used allometric scaling equations to estimate the per-gram carotenoid consumption of each study's subjects, and we used meta-regression to evaluate the effects of this carotenoid dose on differences in coloration and plasma carotenoid levels between supplemented and control groups of birds. After accounting for supplementation duration and species, we observed a significant positive correlation between carotenoid intake and response of plasma carotenoid level to supplementation. The presence of supplemental carotenoids also tended to increase the expression of ornamental coloration, but the magnitude of the carotenoid dose did not significantly affect how strongly coloration changed with supplementation. Further, coloration effect sizes had no significant relationship with plasma carotenoid effect sizes. We also found significant heterogeneity in responses among studies and species, and the parameters used to measure color significantly affected response to supplementation. Our results emphasize the importance of performing dosage trials to determine what supplementation levels provide limited versus surplus carotenoids and of measuring the natural level of carotenoid intake by the study species to validate the appropriateness of supplementation levels for a particular study species and experimental design.
类胡萝卜素着色是动物中研究最为频繁的观赏性特征之一。许多关于类胡萝卜素着色的研究检验了类胡萝卜素着色与性能指标(如免疫能力和氧化状态)之间的关联,其前提是类胡萝卜素是有限的资源。此类研究通常包括用类胡萝卜素补充圈养鸟类的饮食。然而,在许多情况下,所施用类胡萝卜素的量并无充分依据,甚至所谓的类胡萝卜素受限饮食也可能使鸟类的系统达到饱和。为了量化实验中施用的类胡萝卜素量、循环类胡萝卜素水平以及沉积在彩色饰羽中的类胡萝卜素量之间的关系,我们对15项已发表的研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究对七种鸣禽中的一种补充了类胡萝卜素。我们使用异速生长比例方程来估计每项研究中受试者每克的类胡萝卜素消耗量,并使用荟萃回归来评估这种类胡萝卜素剂量对补充组和对照组鸟类之间颜色差异和血浆类胡萝卜素水平差异的影响。在考虑了补充持续时间和物种因素后,我们观察到类胡萝卜素摄入量与血浆类胡萝卜素水平对补充的反应之间存在显著的正相关。补充类胡萝卜素也往往会增加观赏性颜色的表达,但类胡萝卜素剂量的大小并未显著影响颜色随补充而变化的强度。此外,颜色效应大小与血浆类胡萝卜素效应大小之间没有显著关系。我们还发现研究和物种之间的反应存在显著异质性,并且用于测量颜色的参数显著影响对补充的反应。我们的结果强调了进行剂量试验以确定何种补充水平提供有限与过量类胡萝卜素的重要性,以及测量研究物种的类胡萝卜素自然摄入量水平以验证特定研究物种和实验设计的补充水平是否合适的重要性。