Nadler A, Ben-Shushan D
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Apr;57(2):287-93. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.57.2.287.
The present study explored the differences between male and female Holocaust survivors (n = 34) and controls (n = 34) who were similar to the survivors but had not been victims of the Holocaust. Half of the respondents were from the city and the other half were from the Kibbutz. The main dependent measures included the CAQ, the TSCS, and a specially designed Centrality of Family scale. Survivors were worse off psychologically than comparison individuals on the quality of emotional life, on emotional expression, and on the quality of interpersonal relations. Also, survivors assigned relatively greater value to their postwar families. City survivors seem to be worse off than Kibbutz survivors, and male survivors from the city had the lowest scores on several key subscales. These data were corroborated and extended by a content analysis of an open-ended interview conducted after the objective measures had been completed. The findings and their implications for understanding the effects of massive traumatization over individuals' life cycles are discussed.
本研究探讨了大屠杀幸存者(n = 34)与对照组(n = 34)之间的差异,对照组与幸存者相似,但未曾遭受大屠杀。一半的受访者来自城市,另一半来自基布兹。主要的因变量包括冲突应对问卷(CAQ)、自我概念量表(TSCS)以及专门设计的家庭中心量表。在情感生活质量、情感表达和人际关系质量方面,幸存者在心理上比对照个体状况更差。此外,幸存者赋予他们战后家庭相对更高的价值。城市幸存者似乎比基布兹幸存者状况更差,来自城市的男性幸存者在几个关键子量表上得分最低。在完成客观测量后进行的开放式访谈的内容分析证实并扩展了这些数据。本文讨论了这些发现及其对理解大规模创伤对个体生命周期影响的意义。