• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients with superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年表浅性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤的疗效及安全性。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):242-9. doi: 10.1177/2050640615604780. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
2
Usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients: a single-center retrospective cohort study.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年患者食管浅表鳞状细胞癌的有效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 28;51(6):895-904. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab030.
3
A phase II study of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms (KDOG 0901).内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管浅表性肿瘤的 II 期研究(KDOG0901)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov;78(5):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.182. Epub 2013 May 13.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms in elderly patients: A single-center, large-scale, retrospective study.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年患者食管浅表性肿瘤:一项单中心、大规模、回顾性研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 May;20(5):430-435. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13892. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
5
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms.内镜下黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗大型浅表性食管鳞状细胞肿瘤
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 7;22(1):435-45. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.435.
6
[Comparison of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection with endoscopic submucosal dissection for large esophageal superficial neoplasms].内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管大型浅表肿瘤的比较
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2014 Jan;34(1):36-40.
7
Early esophageal cancer in Europe: endoscopic treatment by endoscopic submucosal dissection.欧洲早期食管癌:内镜黏膜下剥离术的内镜治疗。
Endoscopy. 2015 Feb;47(2):113-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391086. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
8
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for intraepithelial neoplasia of the esophagogastric junction.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管胃交界部上皮内肿瘤的疗效和安全性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(3):417-22.
9
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating early gastric cancer: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting (EMR-P).内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期胃癌的临床疗效:与环周预切开后内镜黏膜切除术(EMR-P)的比较。
Dig Liver Dis. 2009 Mar;41(3):201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
10
Short term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection in superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗浅表性食管鳞状细胞肿瘤的短期结果
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb 16;2(2):69-74. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i2.69.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.老年食管鳞癌患者的管理。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;52(8):816-824. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyac067.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Elderly Patients.老年患者小胃胃肠道间质瘤内镜切除的疗效与安全性
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Apr 23;2022:8415913. doi: 10.1155/2022/8415913. eCollection 2022.
3
Impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the treatment strategy and survival in elderly patients after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.高龄患者非治愈性内镜黏膜下剥离术后接受治疗策略和生存的 Charlson 合并症指数的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct;54(10):871-880. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01583-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
4
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效及安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3905-3911. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5421-4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Early esophageal cancer in Europe: endoscopic treatment by endoscopic submucosal dissection.欧洲早期食管癌:内镜黏膜下剥离术的内镜治疗。
Endoscopy. 2015 Feb;47(2):113-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391086. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
2
Efficacy and complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管癌的疗效及并发症:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 May 7;9:78. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-78.
3
Assessment of safety of non-anesthesiologist-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography based on performance status in elderly patients.基于老年患者体能状态评估非麻醉医师辅助内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的安全性
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;29(11):1943-8. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12608.
4
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous esophageal neoplasia: a meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管浅表鳞癌的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Aug;59(8):1862-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3098-2. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
5
Endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal neoplasms.早期食管肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术后良性食管狭窄的内镜球囊扩张术
J Dig Dis. 2014 May;15(5):224-9. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12136.
6
Relevant risk factors and prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia.浅表食管鳞状细胞肿瘤内镜下黏膜下剥离术后切缘阳性的相关危险因素及预后影响
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1653-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3366-9. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
7
Squamous dysplasia--the precursor lesion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.鳞状上皮不典型增生——食管鳞状细胞癌的癌前病变。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Apr;22(4):540-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1347.
8
Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管癌后重度狭窄的控制:口服类固醇治疗联合球囊扩张或单纯球囊扩张。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Aug;78(2):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
9
Is the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification useful in risk stratification for endoscopic procedures?美国麻醉医师学会分类在内镜检查的风险分层中是否有用?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.11.039.
10
A pilot study of scheduled endoscopic balloon dilation with oral agent tranilast to improve the efficacy of stricture dilation after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus.经口给予曲尼司特的计划性内镜球囊扩张治疗食管黏膜下剥离术后狭窄的初步研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;46(9):e76-82. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824fff76.

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年表浅性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤的疗效及安全性。

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients with superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, the Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, P.R. China; Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, P.R. China.

Department of Gastroenterology, the Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, P.R. China.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):242-9. doi: 10.1177/2050640615604780. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1177/2050640615604780
PMID:27087953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4804374/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms in elderly patients (≥65 years) compared with non-elderly patients.

METHODS

All patients with superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms receiving endoscopic submucosal dissection were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 130 were aged 65 or older (group A), and 201 were aged younger than 65 years (group B). Therapeutic efficacy, adverse events, and follow-up data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Group A had a higher prevalence of concomitant diseases than group B (52.3% vs. 14.9%, respectively). R0 resection rate was 82.3% in group A and 84.6 % in group B (P = 0.717). The curative resection rate was 80.8% in group A and 83.6% in group B (P = 0.653). The rate of procedure-related non-cardiopulmonary adverse events was 20.8% in group A and 16.9% in group B (P = 0.377). The incidence of cardiopulmonary adverse events during or after the procedure was 6.2% in group A and 2.5% in group B (P = 0.094). No procedure-related mortality was reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is effective and safe for treating superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms in elderly patients.

摘要

背景

对于老年患者(≥65 岁)的表浅性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤,内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效和安全性知之甚少。

目的

评估内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年(≥65 岁)与非老年患者表浅性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析所有接受内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗的表浅性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤患者。其中年龄≥65 岁者 130 例(A 组),年龄<65 岁者 201 例(B 组)。评估治疗效果、不良事件和随访数据。

结果

A 组合并症的发生率高于 B 组(分别为 52.3%和 14.9%)。A 组 R0 切除率为 82.3%,B 组为 84.6%(P=0.717)。A 组的完全切除率为 80.8%,B 组为 83.6%(P=0.653)。A 组与 B 组术中及术后与操作相关的非心肺不良事件发生率分别为 20.8%和 16.9%(P=0.377)。A 组术中及术后心肺不良事件的发生率为 6.2%,B 组为 2.5%(P=0.094)。两组均未发生与操作相关的死亡。

结论

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗老年患者表浅性食管鳞状上皮肿瘤是有效且安全的。