Vermeij Geerat J
University of California, Davis, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Ann Bot. 2016 Jun;117(7):1099-109. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw061. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
Plants (attached photosynthesizing organisms) are eaten by a wide variety of herbivorous animals. Despite a vast literature on plant defence, contrasting patterns of antiherbivore adaptation among marine, freshwater and land plants have been little noticed, documented or understood.
Here I show how the surrounding medium (water or air) affects not only the plants themselves, but also the sensory and locomotor capacities of herbivores and their predators, and I discuss patterns of defence and host specialization of plants and herbivores on land and in water. I analysed the literature on herbivory with special reference to mechanical defences and sensory cues emitted by plants. Spines, hairs, asymmetrically oriented features on plant surfaces, and visual and olfactory signals that confuse or repel herbivores are common in land plants but rare or absent in water-dwelling plants. Small terrestrial herbivores are more often host-specific than their aquatic counterparts. I propose that patterns of selection on terrestrial herbivores and plants differ from those on aquatic species. Land plants must often attract animal dispersers and pollinators that, like their herbivorous counterparts, require sophisticated locomotor and sensory abilities. Plants counter their attractiveness to animal helpers by evolving effective contact defences and long-distance cues that mislead or warn herbivores. The locomotor and sensory world of small aquatic herbivores is more limited. These characteristics result from the lower viscosity and density of air compared with water as well as from limitations on plant physiology and signal transmission in water. Evolutionary innovations have not eliminated the contrasts in the conditions of life between water and land.
Plant defence can be understood fully when herbivores and their victims are considered in the broader context of other interactions among coexisting species and of the medium in which these interactions occur.
植物(附着的光合生物)被各种各样的食草动物所食用。尽管关于植物防御有大量文献,但海洋、淡水和陆地植物之间不同的抗食草动物适应模式却很少被注意、记录或理解。
在这里,我展示了周围介质(水或空气)不仅如何影响植物本身,还如何影响食草动物及其捕食者的感官和运动能力,并且我讨论了陆地和水中植物与食草动物的防御模式和寄主专一性。我分析了关于食草作用的文献,特别参考了植物发出的机械防御和感官线索。刺、毛、植物表面不对称定向的特征,以及迷惑或驱赶食草动物的视觉和嗅觉信号在陆地植物中很常见,但在水生植物中很少见或不存在。小型陆生食草动物比它们的水生同类更常具有寄主专一性。我提出,对陆生食草动物和植物的选择模式与对水生物种的选择模式不同。陆地植物常常必须吸引动物传播者和传粉者,而这些动物与它们的食草同类一样,需要复杂的运动和感官能力。植物通过进化出有效的接触防御和误导或警告食草动物的远距离线索来抵消它们对动物帮手的吸引力。小型水生食草动物的运动和感官世界更有限。这些特征源于空气与水相比更低的粘度和密度,以及水对植物生理和信号传递的限制。进化创新并没有消除水和陆地生活条件之间的差异。
当在共存物种之间其他相互作用以及这些相互作用发生的介质的更广泛背景下考虑食草动物及其受害者时,才能充分理解植物防御。