Wang Yinhua, Diaz Arenas Carolina, Stoebel Daniel M, Flynn Kenneth, Knapp Ethan, Dillon Marcus M, Wünsche Andrea, Hatcher Philip J, Moore Francisco B-G, Cooper Vaughn S, Cooper Tim F
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204;
Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5047-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524988113. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
The effect of a mutation depends on its interaction with the genetic background in which it is assessed. Studies in experimental systems have demonstrated that such interactions are common among beneficial mutations and often follow a pattern consistent with declining evolvability of more fit genotypes. However, these studies generally examine the consequences of interactions between a small number of focal mutations. It is not clear, therefore, that findings can be extrapolated to natural populations, where new mutations may be transferred between genetically divergent backgrounds. We build on work that examined interactions between four beneficial mutations selected in a laboratory-evolved population of Escherichia coli to test how they interact with the genomes of diverse natural isolates of the same species. We find that the fitness effect of transferred mutations depends weakly on the genetic and ecological similarity of recipient strains relative to the donor strain in which the mutations were selected. By contrast, mutation effects were strongly inversely correlated to the initial fitness of the recipient strain. That is, there was a pattern of diminishing returns whereby fit strains benefited proportionally less from an added mutation. Our results strengthen the view that the fitness of a strain can be a major determinant of its ability to adapt. They also support a role for barriers of transmission, rather than differential selection of transferred DNA, as an explanation of observed phylogenetically determined patterns of restricted recombination among E. coli strains.
突变的效应取决于其与评估该突变时所处遗传背景的相互作用。在实验系统中的研究表明,这种相互作用在有益突变中很常见,并且通常遵循一种模式,即更适应的基因型的进化能力逐渐下降。然而,这些研究通常只考察少数重点突变之间相互作用的后果。因此,尚不清楚这些研究结果能否外推至自然种群,因为在自然种群中,新突变可能在遗传上不同的背景之间转移。我们在一项研究的基础上展开工作,该研究考察了在实验室进化的大肠杆菌群体中选择的四个有益突变之间的相互作用,以测试它们如何与同一物种的不同自然分离株的基因组相互作用。我们发现,转移突变的适应性效应在较弱程度上取决于受体菌株相对于选择出这些突变的供体菌株的遗传和生态相似性。相比之下,突变效应与受体菌株的初始适应性呈强烈负相关。也就是说,存在一种收益递减模式,即适应性强的菌株从额外突变中获得的益处成比例地更少。我们的结果强化了这样一种观点,即菌株的适应性可能是其适应能力的一个主要决定因素。它们还支持了传播障碍的作用,而非转移DNA的差异选择,以此来解释在大肠杆菌菌株中观察到的由系统发育决定的有限重组模式。