Suppr超能文献

波动的生存选择解释了鸟类群体规模的差异。

Fluctuating survival selection explains variation in avian group size.

作者信息

Brown Charles R, Brown Mary Bomberger, Roche Erin A, O'Brien Valerie A, Page Catherine E

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5113-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600218113. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

Abstract

Most animal groups vary extensively in size. Because individuals in certain sizes of groups often have higher apparent fitness than those in other groups, why wide group size variation persists in most populations remains unexplained. We used a 30-y mark-recapture study of colonially breeding cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) to show that the survival advantages of different colony sizes fluctuated among years. Colony size was under both stabilizing and directional selection in different years, and reversals in the sign of directional selection regularly occurred. Directional selection was predicted in part by drought conditions: birds in larger colonies tended to be favored in cooler and wetter years, and birds in smaller colonies in hotter and drier years. Oscillating selection on colony size likely reflected annual differences in food availability and the consequent importance of information transfer, and/or the level of ectoparasitism, with the net benefit of sociality varying under these different conditions. Averaged across years, there was no net directional change in selection on colony size. The wide range in cliff swallow group size is probably maintained by fluctuating survival selection and represents the first case, to our knowledge, in which fitness advantages of different group sizes regularly oscillate over time in a natural vertebrate population.

摘要

大多数动物群体在大小上差异很大。由于特定规模群体中的个体往往比其他群体中的个体具有更高的表观适合度,所以大多数种群中群体大小为何存在广泛差异仍无法解释。我们对群居繁殖的崖燕(白额燕)进行了一项为期30年的标记重捕研究,以表明不同群体规模的生存优势在不同年份间波动。群体规模在不同年份既受到稳定选择也受到定向选择,并且定向选择的方向经常发生逆转。定向选择部分是由干旱条件预测的:在较凉爽湿润的年份,较大群体中的鸟类往往更具优势,而在较炎热干燥的年份,较小群体中的鸟类更具优势。对群体规模的振荡选择可能反映了食物可获得性的年度差异以及信息传递的重要性,和/或体外寄生虫感染水平,在这些不同条件下社会性的净收益有所不同。多年平均来看,对群体规模的选择没有净定向变化。据我们所知,崖燕群体规模的广泛范围可能是由波动的生存选择维持的,这代表了首例在自然脊椎动物种群中不同群体规模的适合度优势随时间定期振荡的情况。

相似文献

1
Fluctuating survival selection explains variation in avian group size.波动的生存选择解释了鸟类群体规模的差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5113-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600218113. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
4
Variation in age composition among colony sizes in Cliff Swallows.崖燕不同群体规模间的年龄组成差异。
J Field Ornithol. 2014 Sep;85(3):289-300. doi: 10.1111/jofo.12068. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
5
Variation in neophobia among cliff swallows at different colonies.不同燕鸥群体间对新事物的恐惧程度存在差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0226886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226886. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

2
Low heritability of social phenotypes in a nonpasserine waterbird.一种非雀形目水鸟社会表型的低遗传力
Curr Zool. 2023 Jun 21;70(4):465-471. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoad024. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Costs and benefits of group living in primates: an energetic perspective.灵长类动物群居的成本与收益:能量视角
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0239.
9
Convergent evolution in social swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae).群居燕子(雀形目:燕科)的趋同进化。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 20;7(2):550-560. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2641. eCollection 2017 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.对相关性状选择的度量
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x.
2
Optimal group size in a highly social mammal.一种高度社会化哺乳动物的最佳群体规模。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 1;112(48):14882-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517794112. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
3
Infectious disease and group size: more than just a numbers game.传染病与群体规模:不仅仅是一场数字游戏。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 26;370(1669). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0111.
4
Costs and benefits of late nesting in cliff swallows.崖燕晚筑巢的成本与收益
Oecologia. 2015 Feb;177(2):413-21. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3095-3. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Directional selection in temporally replicated studies is remarkably consistent.在时间重复研究中,定向选择非常一致。
Evolution. 2012 Feb;66(2):435-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01444.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
7
Understanding animal group-size distributions.理解动物群体大小分布。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023438. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
Visualizing and quantifying natural selection.可视化和量化自然选择。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Aug;10(8):313-8. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89117-x.
10
Choice of colony size in birds.鸟类群体大小的选择。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Dec;5(12):398-403. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90023-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验