• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波动的生存选择解释了鸟类群体规模的差异。

Fluctuating survival selection explains variation in avian group size.

作者信息

Brown Charles R, Brown Mary Bomberger, Roche Erin A, O'Brien Valerie A, Page Catherine E

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5113-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600218113. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1600218113
PMID:27091998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4983850/
Abstract

Most animal groups vary extensively in size. Because individuals in certain sizes of groups often have higher apparent fitness than those in other groups, why wide group size variation persists in most populations remains unexplained. We used a 30-y mark-recapture study of colonially breeding cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) to show that the survival advantages of different colony sizes fluctuated among years. Colony size was under both stabilizing and directional selection in different years, and reversals in the sign of directional selection regularly occurred. Directional selection was predicted in part by drought conditions: birds in larger colonies tended to be favored in cooler and wetter years, and birds in smaller colonies in hotter and drier years. Oscillating selection on colony size likely reflected annual differences in food availability and the consequent importance of information transfer, and/or the level of ectoparasitism, with the net benefit of sociality varying under these different conditions. Averaged across years, there was no net directional change in selection on colony size. The wide range in cliff swallow group size is probably maintained by fluctuating survival selection and represents the first case, to our knowledge, in which fitness advantages of different group sizes regularly oscillate over time in a natural vertebrate population.

摘要

大多数动物群体在大小上差异很大。由于特定规模群体中的个体往往比其他群体中的个体具有更高的表观适合度,所以大多数种群中群体大小为何存在广泛差异仍无法解释。我们对群居繁殖的崖燕(白额燕)进行了一项为期30年的标记重捕研究,以表明不同群体规模的生存优势在不同年份间波动。群体规模在不同年份既受到稳定选择也受到定向选择,并且定向选择的方向经常发生逆转。定向选择部分是由干旱条件预测的:在较凉爽湿润的年份,较大群体中的鸟类往往更具优势,而在较炎热干燥的年份,较小群体中的鸟类更具优势。对群体规模的振荡选择可能反映了食物可获得性的年度差异以及信息传递的重要性,和/或体外寄生虫感染水平,在这些不同条件下社会性的净收益有所不同。多年平均来看,对群体规模的选择没有净定向变化。据我们所知,崖燕群体规模的广泛范围可能是由波动的生存选择维持的,这代表了首例在自然脊椎动物种群中不同群体规模的适合度优势随时间定期振荡的情况。

相似文献

1
Fluctuating survival selection explains variation in avian group size.波动的生存选择解释了鸟类群体规模的差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5113-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600218113. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
2
Fluctuating viability selection on morphology of cliff swallows is driven by climate.气候变化驱动崖沙燕形态的生存力选择波动。
J Evol Biol. 2013 May;26(5):1129-42. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12130. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
3
Why come back home? Breeding-site fidelity varies with group size and parasite load in a colonial bird.为什么要回到家乡?在一种群居鸟类中,繁殖地忠诚度随群体规模和寄生虫负荷而变化。
Anim Behav. 2017 Oct;132:167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
4
Variation in age composition among colony sizes in Cliff Swallows.崖燕不同群体规模间的年龄组成差异。
J Field Ornithol. 2014 Sep;85(3):289-300. doi: 10.1111/jofo.12068. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
5
Variation in neophobia among cliff swallows at different colonies.不同燕鸥群体间对新事物的恐惧程度存在差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0226886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226886. eCollection 2019.
6
Ecological correlates of group integrity among dispersing cliff swallows.扩散中的崖燕群体完整性的生态关联因素
Ecosphere. 2019 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2913. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
7
INTENSE NATURAL SELECTION ON BODY SIZE AND WING AND TAIL ASYMMETRY IN CLIFF SWALLOWS DURING SEVERE WEATHER.恶劣天气期间悬崖燕鸥身体大小、翅膀和尾巴不对称现象的强烈自然选择
Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1461-1475. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02027.x.
8
Heritable choice of colony size in cliff swallows: does experience trump genetics in older birds?崖燕群体大小的可遗传选择:在年长鸟类中,经验是否胜过基因?
Anim Behav. 2011 Dec 1;82(6):1275-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.005.
9
Parasites favour intermediate nestling mass and brood size in cliff swallows.寄生虫在崖燕中偏好中等的雏鸟体重和窝卵数。
J Evol Biol. 2018 Feb;31(2):254-266. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13218. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
10
Recapture heterogeneity in cliff swallows: increased exposure to mist nets leads to net avoidance.重新捕获崖沙燕的异质性:增加接触雾网导致其逃避。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058092. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Social foraging and the associated benefits of group-living in Cliff Swallows decrease over 40 years.崖燕的社会觅食行为以及群居生活带来的相关益处,在40年的时间里有所减少。
Ecol Monogr. 2024 May;94(2). doi: 10.1002/ecm.1602. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Low heritability of social phenotypes in a nonpasserine waterbird.一种非雀形目水鸟社会表型的低遗传力
Curr Zool. 2023 Jun 21;70(4):465-471. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoad024. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
The ontogeny of selection on genetic diversity in harvester ants.收获蚁遗传多样性选择的个体发育史。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jun 8;289(1976):20220496. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0496.
4
Ecological correlates of group integrity among dispersing cliff swallows.扩散中的崖燕群体完整性的生态关联因素
Ecosphere. 2019 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2913. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Quadratic relationships between group size and foraging efficiency in a herbivorous primate.草食性灵长类动物的群体大小与觅食效率之间的二次关系。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 13;8(1):16718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35255-0.
6
Why come back home? Breeding-site fidelity varies with group size and parasite load in a colonial bird.为什么要回到家乡?在一种群居鸟类中,繁殖地忠诚度随群体规模和寄生虫负荷而变化。
Anim Behav. 2017 Oct;132:167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Parasites favour intermediate nestling mass and brood size in cliff swallows.寄生虫在崖燕中偏好中等的雏鸟体重和窝卵数。
J Evol Biol. 2018 Feb;31(2):254-266. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13218. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Costs and benefits of group living in primates: an energetic perspective.灵长类动物群居的成本与收益:能量视角
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0239.
9
Convergent evolution in social swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae).群居燕子(雀形目:燕科)的趋同进化。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 20;7(2):550-560. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2641. eCollection 2017 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.对相关性状选择的度量
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x.
2
Optimal group size in a highly social mammal.一种高度社会化哺乳动物的最佳群体规模。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 1;112(48):14882-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517794112. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
3
Infectious disease and group size: more than just a numbers game.传染病与群体规模:不仅仅是一场数字游戏。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 26;370(1669). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0111.
4
Costs and benefits of late nesting in cliff swallows.崖燕晚筑巢的成本与收益
Oecologia. 2015 Feb;177(2):413-21. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3095-3. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
5
Recapture heterogeneity in cliff swallows: increased exposure to mist nets leads to net avoidance.重新捕获崖沙燕的异质性:增加接触雾网导致其逃避。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058092. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
6
Directional selection in temporally replicated studies is remarkably consistent.在时间重复研究中,定向选择非常一致。
Evolution. 2012 Feb;66(2):435-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01444.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
7
Understanding animal group-size distributions.理解动物群体大小分布。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023438. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
8
Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection?自然种群中的表型选择:什么限制了定向选择?
Am Nat. 2011 Mar;177(3):346-57. doi: 10.1086/658341.
9
Visualizing and quantifying natural selection.可视化和量化自然选择。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Aug;10(8):313-8. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89117-x.
10
Choice of colony size in birds.鸟类群体大小的选择。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Dec;5(12):398-403. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90023-7.