Kroes Maarten W, van Strijen Marco J L, Braak Sicco J, Hoogeveen Yvonne L, de Lange Frank, Schultze Kool Leo J
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Sep;39(9):1322-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-016-1345-y. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
When using laser guidance for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided needle interventions, planned needle paths are visualized to the operator without the need to switch between entry- and progress-view during needle placement. The current study assesses the effect of laser guidance during CBCT-guided biopsies on fluoroscopy and procedure times.
Prospective data from 15 CBCT-guided biopsies of 8-65 mm thoracic and abdominal lesions assisted by a ceiling-mounted laser guidance technique were compared to retrospective data of 36 performed CBCT-guided biopsies of lesions >20 mm using the freehand technique. Fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and number of CBCT-scans were recorded. All data are presented as median (ranges).
For biopsies using the freehand technique, more fluoroscopy time was necessary to guide the needle onto the target, 165 s (83-333 s) compared to 87 s (44-190 s) for laser guidance (p < 0.001). Procedure times were shorter for freehand-guided biopsies, 24 min versus 30 min for laser guidance (p < 0.001).
The use of laser guidance during CBCT-guided biopsies significantly reduces fluoroscopy time.
在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)引导的针穿刺介入操作中使用激光引导时,可向操作者显示计划的针道,在针穿刺过程中无需在进针视图和进针过程视图之间切换。本研究评估了CBCT引导活检过程中激光引导对透视时间和操作时间的影响。
将采用天花板安装式激光引导技术辅助进行的15例CBCT引导的8 - 65mm胸腹部病变活检的前瞻性数据,与36例采用徒手技术进行的CBCT引导的>20mm病变活检的回顾性数据进行比较。记录透视时间、操作时间和CBCT扫描次数。所有数据均以中位数(范围)表示。
对于采用徒手技术的活检,将针引导至靶点需要更多的透视时间,徒手技术为165秒(83 - 333秒),而激光引导为87秒(44 - 190秒)(p < 0.001)。徒手引导活检的操作时间较短,徒手引导为24分钟,激光引导为30分钟(p < 0.001)。
CBCT引导活检过程中使用激光引导可显著减少透视时间。