Schwartz Michael H, Rozumalski Adam, Steele Katherine M
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Nov;58(11):1139-1145. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13126. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
To estimate the impact of dynamic motor control on treatment outcomes in children with cerebral palsy.
We used multiple regression on a retrospective cohort of 473 ambulatory children with cerebral palsy who underwent conservative treatment, single-level orthopaedic surgery, single-event multi-level orthopaedic surgery, or selective dorsal rhizotomy. Outcomes included gait pattern, gait speed, energy cost of walking, and the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Explanatory variables considered were pre-treatment levels of each outcome, treatment group, prior treatment, age, and dynamic motor control computed from surface electromyography using synergy analysis. Effect sizes were estimated from the adjusted response.
Pre-treatment levels had effect sizes 2 to 13 times larger than the next largest variable. Individuals with milder pre-treatment involvement had smaller gains or actual declines. Dynamic motor control was significant in all domains except energy cost. The effect size of dynamic motor control was second only to pre-treatment level, and was substantially larger than the effect size of treatment group for outcomes where both were significant (gait pattern 2:1, gait speed 4:1). The effect of dynamic motor control was independent of treatment group.
Dynamic motor control is an important factor in treatment outcomes. Better dynamic motor control is associated with better outcomes, regardless of treatment.
评估动态运动控制对脑瘫患儿治疗效果的影响。
我们对473名接受保守治疗、单节段骨科手术、单期多节段骨科手术或选择性背根切断术的门诊脑瘫患儿进行回顾性队列研究,并使用多元回归分析。研究结果包括步态模式、步速、步行能量消耗以及儿童结局数据收集工具。所考虑的解释变量包括各结局的治疗前水平、治疗组、既往治疗、年龄以及使用协同分析从表面肌电图计算得出的动态运动控制。效应量通过调整后的反应进行估计。
治疗前水平的效应量比第二大变量大2至13倍。治疗前受累程度较轻的个体改善较小或实际出现下降。除能量消耗外,动态运动控制在所有领域均具有显著意义。动态运动控制的效应量仅次于治疗前水平,对于两者均具有显著意义的结局(步态模式为2:1,步速为4:1),其效应量远大于治疗组。动态运动控制的效应独立于治疗组。
动态运动控制是治疗效果的一个重要因素。无论采用何种治疗方法,更好的动态运动控制都与更好的治疗效果相关。