Suppr超能文献

针对呼吸道感染自我管理的定制交互式网站(互联网医生)的初级保健随机对照试验。

Primary care randomised controlled trial of a tailored interactive website for the self-management of respiratory infections (Internet Doctor).

作者信息

Little Paul, Stuart Beth, Andreou Panayiota, McDermott Lisa, Joseph Judith, Mullee Mark, Moore Mike, Broomfield Sue, Thomas Tammy, Yardley Lucy

机构信息

Primary Care Group, Primary Care and Population Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Centre for the Applications of Health Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 20;6(4):e009769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009769.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess an internet-delivered intervention providing advice to manage respiratory tract infections (RTIs).

DESIGN

Open pragmatic parallel group randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Primary care in UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (aged ≥18) registered with general practitioners, recruited by postal invitation.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised with computer-generated random numbers to access the intervention website (intervention) or not (control). The intervention tailored advice about the diagnosis, natural history, symptom management (particularly paracetamol/ibuprofen use) and when to seek further help.

OUTCOMES

Primary: National Health Service (NHS) contacts for those reporting RTIs from monthly online questionnaires for 20 weeks. Secondary: hospitalisations; symptom duration/severity.

RESULTS

Results 3044 participants were recruited. 852 in the intervention group and 920 in the control group reported one or more RTIs, among whom there a modest increase in NHS Direct contacts in the intervention group (intervention 44/1734 (2.5%) versus control 24/1842 (1.3%); multivariate Risk Ratio (RR) 2.53 (95% CI 1.10 to 5.82, p=0.029)). Conversely reduced contact with doctors occurred (283/1734 (16.3%) vs 368/1845 (20.0%); risk ratio 0.71, 0.53 to 0.95, p=0.019). Reduction in contacts occurred despite slightly longer illness duration (11.3 days versus 10.9 days respectively; multivariateestimate 0.48 days longer (-0.16 to 1.12, p=0.141) and more days of illness rated moderately bad or worse illness (0.53 days; 0.12 to 0.94, p=0.012). The estimate of slower symptom resolution in the intervention group was attenuated when controlling for whether individuals had used webpages which advocated ibuprofen use (length of illness 0.22 days, −0.51 to 0.95, p=0.551; moderately bad or worse symptoms 0.36 days, −0.08 to 0.80, p=0.105). There was no evidence of increased hospitalisations (risk ratio 0.13; 0.02 to 1.01; p=0.051).

CONCLUSIONS

An internet-delivered intervention for the self-management of RTIs modifies help-seeking behaviour, and does not result in more hospital admissions due to delayed help seeking. Advising the use of ibuprofen may not be helpful.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN91518452.

摘要

目的

评估一项通过互联网提供的关于呼吸道感染(RTIs)管理建议的干预措施。

设计

开放性实用平行组随机对照试验。

设置

英国的初级医疗保健机构。

参与者

通过邮寄邀请招募的、在全科医生处注册的成年人(年龄≥18岁)。

干预措施

使用计算机生成的随机数字将患者随机分组,一组可访问干预网站(干预组),另一组不可访问(对照组)。该干预措施提供关于诊断、自然病程、症状管理(特别是对乙酰氨基酚/布洛芬的使用)以及何时寻求进一步帮助的定制建议。

结果指标

主要指标:通过20周的月度在线问卷报告RTIs的患者与国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的接触情况。次要指标:住院情况;症状持续时间/严重程度。

结果

共招募了3044名参与者。干预组中有852人,对照组中有920人报告了一次或多次RTIs,其中干预组与NHS Direct的接触略有增加(干预组44/1734(2.5%),对照组24/1842(1.3%);多变量风险比(RR)2.53(95%置信区间1.10至5.82,p = 0.029))。相反,与医生的接触减少了(283/1734(16.3%)对368/1845(20.0%);风险比0.71,0.53至0.95,p = 0.019)。尽管病程略长(分别为11.3天和10.9天;多变量估计长0.48天(-0.16至1.12,p = 0.141)),且病情评为中度或更严重的天数更多(0.53天;0.12至0.94,p = 0.012),但接触次数仍减少。当控制个体是否使用了提倡使用布洛芬的网页时,干预组症状缓解较慢的估计值减弱(病程0.22天,-0.51至0.95,p = 0.551;中度或更严重症状0.36天,-0.08至0.80,p = 0.105)。没有证据表明住院人数增加(风险比0.13;0.02至1.01;p = 0.051)。

结论

一项通过互联网提供的RTIs自我管理干预措施改变了求助行为,且不会因延迟求助而导致更多住院情况。建议使用布洛芬可能并无帮助。

试验注册号

ISRCTN91518452

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验