Earthy Matters Environmental Consultants, Glenvar, Co. Donegal, F92 HX03, Ireland.
Bord na Móna, Tullamore, Co. Offaly, Ireland.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):4080-4095. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13325. Epub 2016 May 14.
Drained peat soils are a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to the atmosphere. Rewetting these soils is considered an important climate change mitigation tool to reduce emissions and create suitable conditions for carbon sequestration. Long-term monitoring is essential to capture interannual variations in GHG emissions and associated environmental variables and to reduce the uncertainty linked with GHG emission factor calculations. In this study, we present GHG balances: carbon dioxide (CO ), methane (CH ) and nitrous oxide (N O) calculated for a 5-year period at a rewetted industrial cutaway peatland in Ireland (rewetted 7 years prior to the start of the study); and compare the results with an adjacent drained area (2-year data set), and with ten long-term data sets from intact (i.e. undrained) peatlands in temperate and boreal regions. In the rewetted site, CO exchange (or net ecosystem exchange (NEE)) was strongly influenced by ecosystem respiration (R ) rather than gross primary production (GPP). CH emissions were related to soil temperature and either water table level or plant biomass. N O emissions were not detected in either drained or rewetted sites. Rewetting reduced CO emissions in unvegetated areas by approximately 50%. When upscaled to the ecosystem level, the emission factors (calculated as 5-year mean of annual balances) for the rewetted site were (±SD) -104 ± 80 g CO -C m yr (i.e. CO sink) and 9 ± 2 g CH -C m yr (i.e. CH source). Nearly a decade after rewetting, the GHG balance (100-year global warming potential) had reduced noticeably (i.e. less warming) in comparison with the drained site but was still higher than comparative intact sites. Our results indicate that rewetted sites may be more sensitive to interannual changes in weather conditions than their more resilient intact counterparts and may switch from an annual CO sink to a source if triggered by slightly drier conditions.
排干的泥炭地是向大气排放温室气体 (GHG) 的重要来源。重新润湿这些土壤被认为是减少排放和为碳封存创造合适条件的重要气候变化缓解工具。长期监测对于捕捉温室气体排放和相关环境变量的年际变化以及减少与温室气体排放因子计算相关的不确定性至关重要。在这项研究中,我们提出了在爱尔兰重新润湿的工业开采泥炭地进行了 5 年的温室气体平衡:二氧化碳 (CO )、甲烷 (CH )和氧化亚氮 (N O) 的计算结果(在研究开始前 7 年重新润湿);并将结果与相邻的排干区(2 年数据集)进行比较,并与温带和北方地区 10 个完整(即未排干)泥炭地的长期数据集进行比较。在重新润湿的地点,CO 交换(或净生态系统交换 (NEE))主要受生态系统呼吸 (R )而不是总初级生产力 (GPP) 的影响。CH 排放与土壤温度以及水位或植物生物量有关。在排干或重新润湿的地点均未检测到 N O 排放。重新润湿使无植被地区的 CO 排放量减少了约 50%。当扩展到生态系统水平时,重新润湿地点的排放因子(作为 5 年的年平均值计算)为 -104 ± 80 g CO -C m -2 yr(即 CO 汇)和 9 ± 2 g CH -C m -2 yr(即 CH 源)。重新润湿近十年后,与排干地点相比,温室气体平衡(100 年全球变暖潜能)明显减少(即变暖程度降低),但仍高于可比的完整地点。我们的结果表明,与更具弹性的完整地点相比,重新润湿的地点可能对天气条件的年际变化更为敏感,如果条件稍显干燥,它们可能会从每年的 CO 汇转变为源。