Nolff M C, Reese S, Fehr M, Dening R, Meyer-Lindenberg A
Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Veterinärstrasse 13, Munich, 80539, Germany.
Department for Basic Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Professor-Huber-Platz 2, Munich, 80539, Germany.
J Small Anim Pract. 2016 May;57(5):255-9. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12476. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
To describe the bacterial bio-burden of open-treated wounds and make comparisons with bite wounds.
Retrospective multicentre study.
Microbial culture between 2011 and 2013 from open-treated wounds in dogs and cats (initiation of therapy n=88, follow-up n=52) were compared to those from bite wounds (n=184).
Bacteria were identified and tested for antibiotic susceptibility by two accredited laboratories.
In total, 77/88 (88%) of open-treated wounds yielded positive bacterial cultures at the beginning of treatment, decreasing to 27/52 (52%) during treatment. Upon initial evaluation, 42/88 (48 %) of open-treated wounds were considered infected with multi-drug-resistant bacteria, with a drop to 22/52 (41%) during therapy. Bite wounds yielded fewer positive cultures 88/184 (48%) with only 11/182 (6%) being affected by multi-drug-resistant bacteria. Bacteria found most commonly in open-treated wounds were Enterococcus subspecies, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
The bacterial populations of open-treated wounds differed markedly from the bite wounds. The high incidence of multi-drug-resistant strains in open wounds highlights the need for alternatives to antibiotics.
描述开放性治疗伤口的细菌生物负荷,并与咬伤伤口进行比较。
回顾性多中心研究。
将2011年至2013年犬猫开放性治疗伤口(治疗开始时n = 88,随访时n = 52)的微生物培养结果与咬伤伤口(n = 184)的进行比较。
由两个认可的实验室鉴定细菌并检测其抗生素敏感性。
总体而言,88例开放性治疗伤口中有77例(88%)在治疗开始时细菌培养呈阳性,治疗期间降至27例(52%)。初步评估时,88例开放性治疗伤口中有42例(48%)被认为感染了多重耐药菌,治疗期间降至22例(41%)。咬伤伤口的阳性培养结果较少,184例中有88例(48%),只有182例中的11例(6%)受多重耐药菌影响。开放性治疗伤口中最常见的细菌是肠球菌亚种、大肠杆菌、中间型葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌。
开放性治疗伤口的细菌菌群与咬伤伤口明显不同。开放性伤口中多重耐药菌株高发凸显了对抗生素替代物的需求。