Fernández Juan, Quiroga M A, Escorial Sergio, Privado Jesús
Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Psicothema. 2016 May;28(2):130-6. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.169.
In spite of the verifiable achievements obtained in gender equity, one wonders if they still exist in our societies gendered activities (roles) at the household level. This study states an affirmative prediction. Gender role is here organized in four different nuclei: instrumentality inside and outside home for men; expressiveness and instrumentality inside home for women, pertaining to two clearly different domains (household activities for men and household activities for women).
98 women and 86 men completed the Gender Roles Questionnaire (GRQ).
Obtained results showed that: (a) men and women do not do certain household activities (roles) with the same frequency; (b) the four-dimensional approach fits the data better than the one-dimensional and even better than the two-dimensional approach (household gender roles for men and women separately).
Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for both research and education.
尽管在性别平等方面已取得了可证实的成就，但人们不禁要问，在我们的社会中，家庭层面的性别化活动（角色）是否依然存在。本研究给出了肯定的预测。这里的性别角色分为四个不同的核心：男性在家内外的工具性角色；女性在家内的表达性和工具性角色，这属于两个明显不同的领域（男性的家务活动和女性的家务活动）。
98名女性和86名男性完成了性别角色问卷（GRQ）。
所得结果表明：（a）男性和女性进行某些家务活动（角色）的频率不同；（b）与一维方法相比，四维方法更适合这些数据，甚至比二维方法（分别针对男性和女性的家庭性别角色）更适合。
讨论集中于这些结果对研究和教育的影响。
