Saraiva Magda, Albuquerque Pedro B, Arantes Joana
University of Minho.
Psicothema. 2016 May;28(2):181-6. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.241.
The disruption of retrieval strategies hypothesis (Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997) has been identified as the main reason for the occurrence of the collaborative inhibition effect. This study aims to test this hypothesis applying the same retrieval strategy to all participants.
To accomplish this, we compared nominal and collaborative (pairs) performance in a serial recall task in two conditions: use of own strategy vs. use of the method of loci, in a classic experimental paradigm of collaborative memory.
Results revealed that endowing participants with the same strategy of coding and retrieval of information eliminates the collaborative inhibition effect.
This result provides evidence for the hypothesis of the retrieval strategies disruption. The method of loci proved to be an effective mnemonic by increasing the amount of recalled information, both in the nominal and collaborative recall, when the information has to be recalled in the order that was presented.
检索策略破坏假说(巴斯登、巴斯登、布赖纳和托马斯,1997年)已被确定为协同抑制效应产生的主要原因。本研究旨在通过对所有参与者应用相同的检索策略来检验这一假说。
为实现这一目标,我们在协同记忆的经典实验范式中,比较了在两种情况下,即使用自身策略与使用位置记忆法时,在系列回忆任务中的个体表现和协同(成对)表现。
结果显示,赋予参与者相同的信息编码和检索策略可消除协同抑制效应。
这一结果为检索策略破坏假说提供了证据。当必须按照呈现顺序回忆信息时,位置记忆法被证明是一种有效的记忆方法,可增加个体回忆和协同回忆中的回忆信息量。