Reysen Matthew B, Bliss Heather, Baker Melissa A
Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1340-1347. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1318408. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
The present experiments examined the effect of processing words for their survival value, relevance to moving and pleasantness on participants' free recall scores in both nominal groups (non-redundant pooled individual scores) and collaborative dyads. Overall, participants recalled more words in the survival processing conditions than in the moving and pleasantness processing conditions. Furthermore, nominal groups in both the pleasantness condition (Experiment 1) and the moving and pleasantness conditions (Experiment 2) recalled more words than collaborative groups, thereby replicating the oft-observed effect of collaborative inhibition. However, processing words for their survival value appeared to eliminate the deleterious effects of collaborative remembering in both Experiments 1 and 2. These results are discussed in the context of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis and the effects of both expertise and collaborative skill on group remembering.
本实验考察了从生存价值、与移动的相关性和愉悦度等方面处理单词，对名义小组（非冗余合并个体分数）和协作二人组中参与者自由回忆分数的影响。总体而言，参与者在生存处理条件下比在移动和愉悦度处理条件下回忆出更多单词。此外，在愉悦度条件下（实验1）以及移动和愉悦度条件下（实验2）的名义小组，比协作小组回忆出更多单词，从而重现了经常观察到的协作抑制效应。然而，从生存价值方面处理单词，似乎消除了实验1和实验2中协作记忆的有害影响。将结合检索策略干扰假说以及专业知识和协作技能对小组记忆的影响来讨论这些结果。
