Zinckernagel Line, Malta Hansen Carolina, Rod Morten Hulvej, Folke Fredrik, Torp-Pedersen Christian, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen Tine
Centre for Intervention Research, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Gentofte, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 25;6(4):e010481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010481.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in schools is recommended to increase bystander CPR and thereby survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but despite mandating legislation, low rates of implementation have been observed in several countries, including Denmark. The purpose of the study was to explore barriers to implementation of CPR training in Danish secondary schools.
A qualitative study based on individual interviews and focus groups with school leadership and teachers. Thematic analysis was used to identify regular patterns of meaning both within and across the interviews.
8 secondary schools in Denmark. Schools were selected using strategic sampling to reach maximum variation, including schools with/without recent experience in CPR training of students, public/private schools and schools near to and far from hospitals.
The study population comprised 25 participants, 9 school leadership members and 16 teachers.
School leadership and teachers considered it important for implementation and sustainability of CPR training that teachers conduct CPR training of students. However, they preferred external instructors to train students, unless teachers acquired the CPR skills which they considered were needed. They considered CPR training to differ substantially from other teaching subjects because it is a matter of life and death, and they therefore believed extraordinary skills were required for conducting the training. This was mainly rooted in their insecurity about their own CPR skills. CPR training kits seemed to lower expectations of skill requirements to conduct CPR training, but only among those who were familiar with such kits.
To facilitate implementation of CPR training in schools, it is necessary to have clear guidelines regarding the required proficiency level to train students in CPR, to provide teachers with these skills, and to underscore that extensive skills are not required to provide CPR. Further, it is important to familiarise teachers with CPR training kits.
建议在学校开展心肺复苏术(CPR)培训,以增加旁观者实施心肺复苏的几率,从而提高院外心脏骤停患者的存活率。然而,尽管有强制立法要求,但包括丹麦在内的几个国家的实施率仍然很低。本研究的目的是探讨丹麦中学实施心肺复苏术培训的障碍。
一项基于对学校领导和教师进行个人访谈及焦点小组讨论的定性研究。采用主题分析法来识别访谈内部和之间的常规意义模式。
丹麦的8所中学。采用策略性抽样选择学校,以实现最大程度的差异,包括有/无近期学生心肺复苏术培训经验的学校、公立/私立学校以及距离医院远近不同的学校。
研究人群包括25名参与者,9名学校领导成员和16名教师。
学校领导和教师认为教师对学生进行心肺复苏术培训对培训的实施和可持续性很重要。然而,除非教师掌握了他们认为所需的心肺复苏技能,否则他们更倾向于由外部教员对学生进行培训。他们认为心肺复苏术培训与其他教学科目有很大不同,因为这是生死攸关的事情,因此他们认为进行培训需要特殊技能。这主要源于他们对自身心肺复苏技能的不自信。心肺复苏培训套件似乎降低了对进行心肺复苏培训所需技能的期望,但仅限于那些熟悉此类套件的人。
为便于在学校实施心肺复苏术培训,有必要制定关于培训学生心肺复苏术所需熟练水平的明确指导方针,为教师提供这些技能,并强调实施心肺复苏术不需要广泛的技能。此外,让教师熟悉心肺复苏培训套件也很重要。