Department of Pneumology/Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Germany.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1715-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3964.
The house dust mite (HDM) sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet is a potential novel treatment option for HDM allergy-related asthma.
To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of the HDM SLIT tablet vs placebo for asthma exacerbations during an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) reduction period.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted between August 2011 and April 2013 in 109 European trial sites. The trial included 834 adults with HDM allergy-related asthma not well controlled by ICS or combination products, and with HDM allergy-related rhinitis. Key exclusion criteria were FEV1 less than 70% of predicted value or hospitalization due to asthma within 3 months before randomization. Efficacy was assessed during the last 6 months of the trial when ICS was reduced by 50% for 3 months and then completely withdrawn for 3 months.
1:1:1 randomization to once-daily treatment with placebo (n = 277) or HDM SLIT tablet (dosage groups: 6 SQ-HDM [n = 275] or 12 SQ-HDM [n = 282]) in addition to ICS and the short-acting β2-agonist salbutamol.
Primary outcome was time to first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation during the ICS reduction period. Secondary outcomes were deterioration in asthma symptoms, change in allergen-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), change in asthma control or asthma quality-of-life questionnaires, and adverse events.
Among 834 randomized patients (mean age, 33 years [range, 17-83]; women, 48%), 693 completed the study. The 6 SQ-HDM and 12 SQ-HDM doses both significantly reduced the risk of a moderate or severe asthma exacerbation compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72 [95% CI, 0.52-0.99] for the 6 SQ-HDM group, P = .045, and 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50-0.96] for the 12 SQ-HDM group, P = .03). The absolute risk differences based on the observed data (full analysis set) in the active groups vs the placebo group were 0.09 (95% CI, 0.01-0.15) for the 6 SQ-HDM group and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.02-0.16) for the 12 SQ-HDM group. There was no significant difference between the 2 active groups. Compared with placebo, there was a reduced risk of an exacerbation with deterioration in asthma symptoms (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.49-1.02] for the 6 SQ-HDM group, P = .11, and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.96] for the 12 SQ-HDM group, P = .03) and a significant increase in allergen-specific IgG4. However, there was no significant difference for change in asthma control questionnaire or asthma quality-of-life questionnaire for either dose. There were no reports of severe systemic allergic reactions. The most frequent adverse events were mild to moderate oral pruritus (13% for the 6 SQ-HDM group, 20% for the 12 SQ-HDM group, and 3% for the placebo group), mouth edema, and throat irritation.
Among adults with HDM allergy-related asthma not well controlled by ICS, the addition of HDM SLIT to maintenance medications improved time to first moderate or severe asthma exacerbation during ICS reduction, with an estimated absolute reduction at 6 months of 9 to 10 percentage points; the reduction was primarily due to an effect on moderate exacerbations. Treatment-related adverse events were common at both active doses. Further studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
clinicaltrialsregister.eu Identifier: 2010-018621-19.
屋尘螨(HDM)舌下变应原免疫疗法(SLIT)片剂是一种潜在的新型 HDM 过敏相关哮喘治疗选择。
评估 HDM SLIT 片剂与安慰剂在吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)减量期间治疗哮喘加重的疗效和不良事件。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项于 2011 年 8 月至 2013 年 4 月在 109 个欧洲试验点进行的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。该试验纳入了 834 例 HDM 过敏相关哮喘患者,这些患者对 ICS 或联合产品控制不佳,且伴有 HDM 过敏相关鼻炎。主要排除标准为 FEV1 低于预计值的 70%或在随机分组前 3 个月内因哮喘住院。在试验的最后 6 个月期间评估疗效,此时 ICS 减少 50%持续 3 个月,然后完全停用 3 个月。
1:1:1 随机分组,每日一次接受安慰剂(n = 277)或 HDM SLIT 片剂(剂量组:6 SQ-HDM [n = 275]或 12 SQ-HDM [n = 282])治疗,同时使用 ICS 和短效β2-激动剂沙丁胺醇。
主要结局是 ICS 减量期间首次发生中度或重度哮喘加重的时间。次要结局是哮喘症状恶化、过敏原特异性 IgG4 变化、哮喘控制或哮喘生活质量问卷变化以及不良事件。
在 834 例随机患者中(平均年龄 33 岁[范围,17-83];女性占 48%),693 例完成了研究。6 SQ-HDM 和 12 SQ-HDM 剂量均显著降低与安慰剂相比,中度或重度哮喘加重的风险(6 SQ-HDM 组的危险比[HR]:0.72 [95% CI,0.52-0.99],P = .045,12 SQ-HDM 组的 HR:0.69 [95% CI,0.50-0.96],P = .03)。基于观察数据(全分析集),活性组与安慰剂组之间的绝对风险差异分别为 6 SQ-HDM 组 0.09(95% CI,0.01-0.15)和 12 SQ-HDM 组 0.10(95% CI,0.02-0.16)。两组活性药物之间无显著差异。与安慰剂相比,6 SQ-HDM 组(HR:0.72 [95% CI,0.49-1.02],P = .11)和 12 SQ-HDM 组(HR:0.64 [95% CI,0.42-0.96],P = .03)哮喘症状恶化时发生哮喘加重的风险降低,且过敏原特异性 IgG4 水平升高。然而,两组的哮喘控制问卷或哮喘生活质量问卷均无显著变化。没有报告严重的全身过敏反应。最常见的不良事件是轻度至中度口腔瘙痒(6 SQ-HDM 组为 13%,12 SQ-HDM 组为 20%,安慰剂组为 3%)、口腔肿胀和咽喉刺激。
在 HDM 过敏相关哮喘患者中,ICS 维持治疗的基础上加用 HDM SLIT 可改善 ICS 减量期间首次发生中度或重度哮喘加重的时间,估计 6 个月时的绝对减少率为 9%至 10%;这种减少主要是由于中度加重的影响。两种活性剂量的治疗相关不良事件都很常见。需要进一步研究来评估长期疗效和安全性。
clinicaltrialsregister.eu 标识符:2010-018621-19。