• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犬类、身体活动与步行评估(犬类PAW)干预措施:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of the Dogs, Physical Activity, and Walking (Dogs PAW) Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Richards Elizabeth A, Ogata Niwako, Cheng Ching-Wei

机构信息

Elizabeth A. Richards, PhD, RN, CHES, is Assistant Professor, Purdue University School of Nursing, West Lafayette, Indiana. Niwako Ogata, BVSc, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana. Ching-Wei Cheng, BS, is Graduate Student, Purdue University College of Science, West Lafayette, Indiana.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2016 May-Jun;65(3):191-201. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000155.

DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000155
PMID:27124255
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To facilitate physical activity (PA) adoption and maintenance, promotion of innovative population-level strategies that focus on incorporating moderate-intensity lifestyle PAs are needed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the Dogs, Physical Activity, and Walking intervention, a 3-month, social cognitive theory (SCT), e-mail-based PA intervention.

METHODS

In a longitudinal, repeated-measures design, 49 dog owners were randomly assigned to a control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 24). The intervention group received e-mail messages (twice weekly for 4 weeks and weekly for 8 weeks) designed to influence SCT constructs of self-efficacy, self-regulation, outcome expectations and expectancies, and social support. At baseline and every 3 months through 1 year, participants completed self-reported questionnaires of individual, interpersonal, and PA variables. Linear mixed models were used to assess for significant differences in weekly minutes of dog walking and theoretical constructs between groups (intervention and control) across time. To test self-efficacy as a mediator of social support for dog walking, tests for mediation were conducted using the bootstrapping technique.

RESULTS

With the exception of Month 9, participants in the intervention group accumulated significantly more weekly minutes of dog walking than the control group. On average, the intervention group accumulated 58.4 more minutes (SD = 18.1) of weekly dog walking than the control group (p < .05). Self-efficacy partially mediated the effect of social support variables on dog walking.

DISCUSSION

Results indicate that a simple SCT-based e-mail intervention is effective in increasing and maintaining an increase in dog walking among dog owners at 12-month follow-up. In light of these findings, it may be advantageous to design dog walking interventions that focus on increasing self-efficacy for dog walking by fostering social support.

摘要

背景

为促进身体活动(PA)的采用和维持,需要推广注重纳入中等强度生活方式身体活动的创新性人群层面策略。

目的

这项随机对照试验的目的是评估“狗狗、身体活动与步行”干预措施,这是一项基于社会认知理论(SCT)、为期3个月、通过电子邮件进行的身体活动干预。

方法

采用纵向重复测量设计,49名狗主人被随机分配到对照组(n = 25)或干预组(n = 24)。干预组每周收到两次电子邮件(持续4周,之后每周一次,持续8周),旨在影响自我效能、自我调节、结果期望和预期以及社会支持等社会认知理论构建要素。在基线时以及在1年中每3个月,参与者完成关于个人、人际和身体活动变量的自我报告问卷。使用线性混合模型评估两组(干预组和对照组)在不同时间每周遛狗分钟数和理论构建要素的显著差异。为了检验自我效能作为遛狗社会支持的中介作用,使用自助法进行中介检验。

结果

除了第9个月外,干预组参与者每周遛狗的分钟数显著多于对照组。平均而言,干预组每周遛狗的时间比对照组多58.4分钟(标准差 = 18.1)(p <.05)。自我效能部分介导了社会支持变量对遛狗的影响。

讨论

结果表明,一种基于简单社会认知理论的电子邮件干预措施在12个月的随访中有效增加并维持了狗主人的遛狗时间。鉴于这些发现,设计注重通过促进社会支持来提高遛狗自我效能的遛狗干预措施可能是有益的。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Dogs, Physical Activity, and Walking (Dogs PAW) Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.犬类、身体活动与步行评估(犬类PAW)干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
Nurs Res. 2016 May-Jun;65(3):191-201. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000155.
2
Randomized Controlled Theory-Based, E-Mail-Mediated Walking Intervention.基于理论的随机对照电子邮件介导步行干预
Clin Nurs Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):47-67. doi: 10.1177/1054773816657799. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
Dogs, physical activity, and walking (dogs PAW): acceptability and feasibility of a pilot physical activity intervention.狗、身体活动与散步(狗的PAW):一项身体活动试点干预措施的可接受性与可行性
Health Promot Pract. 2015 May;16(3):362-70. doi: 10.1177/1524839914553300. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
4
Social cognitive theory mediators of physical activity in a lifestyle program for cancer survivors and carers: findings from the ENRICH randomized controlled trial.针对癌症幸存者及护理者的生活方式项目中身体活动的社会认知理论中介因素:ENRICH随机对照试验的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 14;13:49. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0372-z.
5
Pilot study of a dog walking randomized intervention: effects of a focus on canine exercise.狗步行随机干预的初步研究:关注犬类运动的效果。
Prev Med. 2012 May;54(5):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
6
The influence of dog ownership on objective measures of free-living physical activity and sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal case-controlled study.养狗对社区居住老年人自由生活身体活动和久坐行为客观指标的影响:一项纵向病例对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4422-5.
7
Increasing collective efficacy for physical activity: Design and rationale of Moms UNITE for Health.提高身体活动的集体效能:“妈妈们团结起来促进健康”项目的设计与原理
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt B):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Evaluation of an internet-based physical activity intervention: a preliminary investigation.基于互联网的身体活动干预评估:一项初步调查。
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Spring;25(2):92-9. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_04.
9
An online social network to increase walking in dog owners: a randomized trial.一个旨在增加养狗者步行量的在线社交网络:一项随机试验。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Mar;47(3):631-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000441.
10
Development and psychometric testing of the Dogs and WalkinG Survey (DAWGS).开发并检验狗和行走量表(DAWGS)。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013 Dec;84(4):492-502. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2013.839935.

引用本文的文献

1
Dog and Guardian Relationships: Application of a Dual-Process Actor-"Partner" Interdependence Model to Predict Regular Walking.人与宠物狗的关系:应用双过程“主人 - 宠物”相互依赖模型预测规律散步行为
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 1;15(5):607. doi: 10.3390/bs15050607.
2
Effects of a dog activity tracker on owners' walking: a community-based randomised controlled trial.狗活动追踪器对主人行走的影响:基于社区的随机对照试验。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Nov 14;17(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06989-0.
3
Examining Obedience Training as a Physical Activity Intervention for Dog Owners: Findings from the Stealth Pet Obedience Training (SPOT) Pilot Study.
检查服从训练作为狗主人的身体活动干预措施:Stealth Pet Obedience Training(SPOT)试点研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;18(3):902. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030902.
4
Veterinary-prescribed physical activity promotes walking in healthy dogs and people.兽医规定的体育活动促进健康犬只和人类的行走。
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Dec 1;16(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02682-z.
5
Dog ownership, the natural outdoor environment and health: a cross-sectional study.养狗、自然户外环境与健康:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e023000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023000.
6
Encouraging Dog Walking for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.鼓励遛狗以促进健康和预防疾病。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Apr 17;12(3):233-243. doi: 10.1177/1559827616643686. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.