Nord Anette, Svensson Leif, Hult Håkan, Kreitz-Sandberg Susanne, Nilsson Lennart
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e010717. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010717.
The aim was to compare students' practical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills and willingness to perform bystander CPR, after a 30 min mobile application (app)-based versus a 50 min DVD-based training.
Seventh grade students in two Swedish municipalities.
A cluster randomised trial. The classes were randomised to receive app-based or DVD-based training. Willingness to act and practical CPR skills were assessed, directly after training and at 6 months, by using a questionnaire and a PC Skill Reporting System. Data on CPR skills were registered in a modified version of the Cardiff test, where scores were given in 12 different categories, adding up to a total score of 12-48 points. Training and measurements were performed from December 2013 to October 2014.
63 classes or 1232 seventh grade students (13-year-old) were included in the study.
Primary end point was the total score of the modified Cardiff test. The individual variables of the test and self-reported willingness to make a life-saving intervention were secondary end points.
The DVD-based group was superior to the app-based group in CPR skills; a total score of 36 (33-38) vs 33 (30-36) directly after training (p<0.001) and 33 (30-36) and 31 (28-34) at 6 months (p<0.001), respectively. At 6 months, the DVD group performed significantly better in 8 out of 12 CPR skill components. Both groups improved compression depth from baseline to follow-up. If a friend suffered cardiac arrest, 78% (DVD) versus 75% (app) would do compressions and ventilations, whereas only 31% (DVD) versus 32% (app) would perform standard CPR if the victim was a stranger.
At 6 months follow-up, the 50 min DVD-based group showed superior CPR skills compared with the 30 min app-based group. The groups did not differ in regard to willingness to make a life-saving effort.
旨在比较在接受30分钟基于移动应用程序(app)的培训与50分钟基于DVD的培训后,学生的心肺复苏术(CPR)实际操作技能以及进行旁观者心肺复苏的意愿。
瑞典两个市的七年级学生。
一项整群随机试验。将班级随机分为接受基于app的培训或基于DVD的培训。在培训结束后及6个月时,通过问卷和个人电脑技能报告系统评估行动意愿和实际心肺复苏技能。心肺复苏技能数据记录在改良版的加的夫测试中,该测试在12个不同类别中打分,总分12 - 48分。培训和测量于2013年12月至2014年10月进行。
63个班级或1232名七年级学生(13岁)纳入本研究。
主要终点是改良加的夫测试的总分。测试的个体变量和自我报告的进行挽救生命干预的意愿为次要终点。
基于DVD的组在心肺复苏技能方面优于基于app的组;培训后直接评估时总分分别为36(33 - 38)分和33(30 - 36)分(p<0.001),6个月时分别为33(30 - 36)分和31(28 - 34)分(p<0.001)。6个月时,基于DVD的组在12项心肺复苏技能组成部分中的8项表现明显更好。两组从基线到随访时按压深度均有改善。如果朋友发生心脏骤停,78%(DVD组)对75%(app组)会进行按压和通气,而如果受害者是陌生人,只有31%(DVD组)对32%(app组)会进行标准心肺复苏。
在6个月随访时,50分钟基于DVD的组与30分钟基于app的组相比,心肺复苏技能更优。两组在进行挽救生命努力的意愿方面无差异。