Suppr超能文献

国家网络课程“Help-Brain-Heart”作为心肺复苏培训前补充学习工具的效果:一项集群随机试验。

The effect of a national web course "Help-Brain-Heart" as a supplemental learning tool before CPR training: a cluster randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185, Linköping, Sweden.

Department of Medicine, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institute, S-11883, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 12;25(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0439-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) learning methods is unclear. Our aim was to evaluate whether a web course before CPR training, teaching the importance of recognition of symptoms of stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and a healthy lifestyle, could influence not only theoretical knowledge but also practical CPR skills or willingness to act in a cardiac arrest situation.

METHODS

Classes with 13-year-old students were randomised to CPR training only (control) or a web course plus CPR training (intervention). Data were collected (practical test and a questionnaire) directly after training and at 6 months. CPR skills were evaluated using a modified Cardiff test (12-48 points). Knowledge on stroke symptoms (0-7 points), AMI symptoms (0-9 points) and lifestyle factors (0-6 points), and willingness to act were assessed by the questionnaire. The primary endpoint was CPR skills at 6 months. CPR skills directly after training, willingness to act and theoretical knowledge were secondary endpoints. Training and measurements were performed from December 2013 to October 2014.

RESULTS

Four hundred and thirty-two students were included in the analysis of practical skills and self-reported confidence. The mean score for CPR skills was 34 points after training (control, standard deviation [SD] 4.4; intervention, SD 4.0; not significant [NS]); and 32 points at 6 months for controls (SD 3.9) and 33 points for intervention (SD 4.2; NS). At 6 months, 73% (control) versus 80% (intervention; P = 0.05) stated they would do compressions and ventilation if a friend had a cardiac arrest, whereas 31% versus 34% (NS) would perform both if the victim was a stranger. One thousand, two hundred and thirty-two students were included in the analysis of theoretical knowledge; the mean scores at 6 months for the control and intervention groups were 2.8 (SD 1.6) and 3.2 (SD 1.4) points (P < 0.001) for stroke symptoms, 2.6 (SD 2.0) and 2.9 (SD 1.9) points (P = 0.008) for AMI symptoms and 3.2 (SD 1.2) and 3.4 (SD 1.0) points (P < 0.001) for lifestyle factors, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Use of online learning platforms is a fast growing technology that increases the flexibility of learning in terms of location, time and is available before and after practical training.

CONCLUSIONS

A web course before CPR training did not influence practical CPR skills or willingness to act, but improved the students' theoretical knowledge of AMI, stroke and lifestyle factors.

摘要

背景

心肺复苏术(CPR)学习方法的有效性尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估在 CPR 培训之前进行网络课程,教授识别中风和急性心肌梗死(AMI)症状以及健康生活方式的重要性,是否不仅会影响理论知识,还会影响实际的 CPR 技能或在心脏骤停情况下采取行动的意愿。

方法

将 13 岁的学生班级随机分为仅接受 CPR 培训(对照组)或接受网络课程加 CPR 培训(干预组)。培训后直接和 6 个月后收集数据(实际测试和问卷调查)。使用改良的卡迪夫测试(12-48 分)评估 CPR 技能。通过问卷评估中风症状(0-7 分)、AMI 症状(0-9 分)和生活方式因素(0-6 分)的知识,以及行动意愿。主要终点是 6 个月时的 CPR 技能。CPR 技能直接培训后、行动意愿和理论知识为次要终点。培训和测量于 2013 年 12 月至 2014 年 10 月进行。

结果

对实际技能和自我报告的信心进行了 432 名学生的分析。培训后 CPR 技能的平均得分为 34 分(对照组,标准差 [SD] 4.4;干预组,SD 4.0;无统计学意义 [NS]);对照组 6 个月时为 32 分(SD 3.9),干预组为 33 分(SD 4.2;NS)。6 个月时,73%(对照组)与 80%(干预组;P=0.05)表示如果朋友发生心脏骤停,他们会进行按压和通气,而 31%与 34%(NS)表示如果受害者是陌生人,他们会同时进行按压和通气。1232 名学生被纳入理论知识分析;对照组和干预组 6 个月的平均得分分别为中风症状的 2.8(SD 1.6)和 3.2(SD 1.4)分(P<0.001),AMI 症状的 2.6(SD 2.0)和 2.9(SD 1.9)分(P=0.008),生活方式因素的 3.2(SD 1.2)和 3.4(SD 1.0)分(P<0.001)。

讨论

在线学习平台的使用是一种快速发展的技术,它提高了学习的灵活性,包括地点、时间,并且可以在实践培训之前和之后使用。

结论

CPR 培训前的网络课程并未影响实际的 CPR 技能或行动意愿,但提高了学生对 AMI、中风和生活方式因素的理论知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad0a/5596498/62d8fa0f930f/13049_2017_439_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验