Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institute, S-11883, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 12;25(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0439-0.
The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) learning methods is unclear. Our aim was to evaluate whether a web course before CPR training, teaching the importance of recognition of symptoms of stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and a healthy lifestyle, could influence not only theoretical knowledge but also practical CPR skills or willingness to act in a cardiac arrest situation.
Classes with 13-year-old students were randomised to CPR training only (control) or a web course plus CPR training (intervention). Data were collected (practical test and a questionnaire) directly after training and at 6 months. CPR skills were evaluated using a modified Cardiff test (12-48 points). Knowledge on stroke symptoms (0-7 points), AMI symptoms (0-9 points) and lifestyle factors (0-6 points), and willingness to act were assessed by the questionnaire. The primary endpoint was CPR skills at 6 months. CPR skills directly after training, willingness to act and theoretical knowledge were secondary endpoints. Training and measurements were performed from December 2013 to October 2014.
Four hundred and thirty-two students were included in the analysis of practical skills and self-reported confidence. The mean score for CPR skills was 34 points after training (control, standard deviation [SD] 4.4; intervention, SD 4.0; not significant [NS]); and 32 points at 6 months for controls (SD 3.9) and 33 points for intervention (SD 4.2; NS). At 6 months, 73% (control) versus 80% (intervention; P = 0.05) stated they would do compressions and ventilation if a friend had a cardiac arrest, whereas 31% versus 34% (NS) would perform both if the victim was a stranger. One thousand, two hundred and thirty-two students were included in the analysis of theoretical knowledge; the mean scores at 6 months for the control and intervention groups were 2.8 (SD 1.6) and 3.2 (SD 1.4) points (P < 0.001) for stroke symptoms, 2.6 (SD 2.0) and 2.9 (SD 1.9) points (P = 0.008) for AMI symptoms and 3.2 (SD 1.2) and 3.4 (SD 1.0) points (P < 0.001) for lifestyle factors, respectively.
Use of online learning platforms is a fast growing technology that increases the flexibility of learning in terms of location, time and is available before and after practical training.
A web course before CPR training did not influence practical CPR skills or willingness to act, but improved the students' theoretical knowledge of AMI, stroke and lifestyle factors.
心肺复苏术(CPR)学习方法的有效性尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估在 CPR 培训之前进行网络课程,教授识别中风和急性心肌梗死(AMI)症状以及健康生活方式的重要性,是否不仅会影响理论知识,还会影响实际的 CPR 技能或在心脏骤停情况下采取行动的意愿。
将 13 岁的学生班级随机分为仅接受 CPR 培训(对照组)或接受网络课程加 CPR 培训(干预组)。培训后直接和 6 个月后收集数据(实际测试和问卷调查)。使用改良的卡迪夫测试(12-48 分)评估 CPR 技能。通过问卷评估中风症状(0-7 分)、AMI 症状(0-9 分)和生活方式因素(0-6 分)的知识,以及行动意愿。主要终点是 6 个月时的 CPR 技能。CPR 技能直接培训后、行动意愿和理论知识为次要终点。培训和测量于 2013 年 12 月至 2014 年 10 月进行。
对实际技能和自我报告的信心进行了 432 名学生的分析。培训后 CPR 技能的平均得分为 34 分(对照组,标准差 [SD] 4.4;干预组,SD 4.0;无统计学意义 [NS]);对照组 6 个月时为 32 分(SD 3.9),干预组为 33 分(SD 4.2;NS)。6 个月时,73%(对照组)与 80%(干预组;P=0.05)表示如果朋友发生心脏骤停,他们会进行按压和通气,而 31%与 34%(NS)表示如果受害者是陌生人,他们会同时进行按压和通气。1232 名学生被纳入理论知识分析;对照组和干预组 6 个月的平均得分分别为中风症状的 2.8(SD 1.6)和 3.2(SD 1.4)分(P<0.001),AMI 症状的 2.6(SD 2.0)和 2.9(SD 1.9)分(P=0.008),生活方式因素的 3.2(SD 1.2)和 3.4(SD 1.0)分(P<0.001)。
在线学习平台的使用是一种快速发展的技术,它提高了学习的灵活性,包括地点、时间,并且可以在实践培训之前和之后使用。
CPR 培训前的网络课程并未影响实际的 CPR 技能或行动意愿,但提高了学生对 AMI、中风和生活方式因素的理论知识。