• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酿酒酵母的非同源末端连接途径在 G1 期细胞中能有效地工作,并能正确且非随机地连接同源末端。

The non-homologous end-joining pathway of S. cerevisiae works effectively in G1-phase cells, and religates cognate ends correctly and non-randomly.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.

Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

出版信息

DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Jun;42:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.03.013
PMID:27130982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4907342/
Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are potentially lethal lesions repaired by two major pathways: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Homologous recombination preferentially reunites cognate broken ends. In contrast, non-homologous end-joining could ligate together any two ends, possibly generating dicentric or acentric fragments, leading to inviability. Here, we characterize the yeast NHEJ pathway in populations of pure G1 phase cells, where there is no possibility of repair using a homolog. We show that in G1 yeast cells, NHEJ is a highly effective repair pathway for gamma-ray induced breaks, even when many breaks are present. Pulsed-field gel analysis showed chromosome karyotypes following NHEJ repair of cells from populations with multiple breaks. The number of reciprocal translocations was surprisingly low, perhaps zero, suggesting that NHEJ preferentially re-ligates the "correct" broken ends instead of randomly-chosen ends. Although we do not know the mechanism, the preferential correct ligation is consistent with the idea that broken ends are continuously held together by protein-protein interactions or by larger scale chromatin structure.

摘要

DNA 双链断裂 (DSBs) 是潜在的致命损伤,可通过两种主要途径修复:同源重组 (HR) 和非同源末端连接 (NHEJ)。同源重组优先重组同源的断裂末端。相比之下,非同源末端连接可以将任意两个末端连接起来,可能产生双中心或无中心片段,导致细胞无法存活。在这里,我们在纯 G1 期细胞群体中表征了酵母 NHEJ 途径,在该群体中,不可能使用同源物进行修复。我们表明,在 G1 期酵母细胞中,NHEJ 是一种非常有效的γ射线诱导断裂修复途径,即使存在许多断裂。脉冲场凝胶分析显示了来自具有多个断裂的细胞群体的 NHEJ 修复后的染色体核型。相互易位的数量出人意料地低,也许为零,这表明 NHEJ 优先重新连接“正确”的断裂末端,而不是随机选择的末端。尽管我们不知道机制,但优先正确连接与这样的想法是一致的,即断裂末端通过蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用或更大规模的染色质结构持续保持在一起。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/bab4d1eb6a15/nihms782515f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/0c5dd8464551/nihms782515f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/903f7c287aee/nihms782515f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/bad2d1fda84d/nihms782515f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/bab4d1eb6a15/nihms782515f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/0c5dd8464551/nihms782515f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/903f7c287aee/nihms782515f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/bad2d1fda84d/nihms782515f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/4907342/bab4d1eb6a15/nihms782515f4.jpg

相似文献

1
The non-homologous end-joining pathway of S. cerevisiae works effectively in G1-phase cells, and religates cognate ends correctly and non-randomly.酿酒酵母的非同源末端连接途径在 G1 期细胞中能有效地工作,并能正确且非随机地连接同源末端。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2016 Jun;42:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
2
Alternative end-joining repair pathways are the ultimate backup for abrogated classical non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination repair: Implications for the formation of chromosome translocations.替代末端连接修复途径是经典非同源末端连接和同源重组修复被废除后的最终备用途径:对染色体易位形成的影响。
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2015 Nov;793:166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
3
Marked contribution of alternative end-joining to chromosome-translocation-formation by stochastically induced DNA double-strand-breaks in G2-phase human cells.在G2期人类细胞中,随机诱导的DNA双链断裂通过替代末端连接对染色体易位形成的显著贡献。
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2015 Nov;793:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
4
Consider the workhorse: Nonhomologous end-joining in budding yeast.以主力军为例:芽殖酵母中的非同源末端连接。
Biochem Cell Biol. 2016 Oct;94(5):396-406. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2016-0001. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
Inhibition of homologous recombination by hyperthermia shunts early double strand break repair to non-homologous end-joining.热疗通过抑制同源重组将早期双链断裂修复转向非同源末端连接。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2013 Jan 1;12(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
6
Cyclin-dependent kinase-dependent phosphorylation of Lif1 and Sae2 controls imprecise nonhomologous end joining accompanied by double-strand break resection.周期蛋白依赖性激酶依赖性的 Lif1 和 Sae2 磷酸化控制伴有双链断裂切除的不精确非同源末端连接。
Genes Cells. 2012 Jun;17(6):473-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2012.01602.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
7
The role of nonhomologous DNA end joining, conservative homologous recombination, and single-strand annealing in the cell cycle-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by H(2)O(2) in mammalian cells.非同源DNA末端连接、保守同源重组和单链退火在哺乳动物细胞中由H₂O₂诱导的DNA双链断裂的细胞周期依赖性修复中的作用。
Radiat Res. 2008 Dec;170(6):784-93. doi: 10.1667/RR1375.1.
8
Requirement of POL3 and POL4 on non-homologous and microhomology-mediated end joining in rad50/xrs2 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.酿酒酵母rad50/xrs2突变体中POL3和POL4对非同源及微同源介导的末端连接的需求
Mutagenesis. 2015 Nov;30(6):841-9. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev046. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
Repair of G1 induced DNA double-strand breaks in S-G2/M by alternative NHEJ.通过替代 NHEJ 修复 S-G2/M 期 G1 诱导的 DNA 双链断裂。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 16;11(1):5239. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19060-w.
10
One end to rule them all: Non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks.一以贯之:DNA 双链断裂处的非同源末端连接和同源重组。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Nov 1;93(1115):20191054. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20191054. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular mechanisms of extrachromosomal circular DNA formation.染色体外环状DNA形成的分子机制。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Feb 27;53(5). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf122.
2
Potency of CRISPR-Cas Antifungals Is Enhanced by Cotargeting DNA Repair and Growth Regulatory Machinery at the Genetic Level.CRISPR-Cas 抗真菌剂的效力通过在遗传水平上靶向 DNA 修复和生长调控机制得到增强。
ACS Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 8;9(12):2494-2503. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00342. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
ACtivE: Assembly and CRISPR-Targeted Editing for Yeast Genome Engineering Using Minimum Reagents and Time.

本文引用的文献

1
DNA End Resection: Nucleases Team Up with the Right Partners to Initiate Homologous Recombination.DNA末端切除:核酸酶与合适的伙伴合作启动同源重组。
J Biol Chem. 2015 Sep 18;290(38):22931-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.675942. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
2
Organization and dynamics of the nonhomologous end-joining machinery during DNA double-strand break repair.DNA双链断裂修复过程中非同源末端连接机制的组织与动力学
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):E2575-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420115112. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
Important role of catalase in the cellular response of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to ionizing radiation.
ACtivE:使用最少的试剂和时间进行酵母基因组工程的组装和 CRISPR 靶向编辑。
ACS Synth Biol. 2022 Nov 18;11(11):3629-3643. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00175. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
The Dynamic Behavior of Chromatin in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.染色质对 DNA 双链断裂的动态反应
Genes (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;13(2):215. doi: 10.3390/genes13020215.
5
A new assay capturing chromosome fusions shows a protection trade-off at telomeres and NHEJ vulnerability to low-density ionizing radiation.一种捕获染色体融合的新检测方法显示了端粒处的保护权衡以及非同源末端连接对低密度电离辐射的脆弱性。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 9;49(12):6817-6831. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab502.
6
Local nucleosome dynamics and eviction following a double-strand break are reversible by NHEJ-mediated repair in the absence of DNA replication.在没有 DNA 复制的情况下,通过非同源末端连接修复(NHEJ)可以使双链断裂后局部核小体动力学和逐出逆转。
Genome Res. 2021 May;31(5):775-788. doi: 10.1101/gr.271155.120. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Double-strand breaks in motion: implications for chromosomal rearrangement.动态中的双链断裂:对染色体重排的影响。
Curr Genet. 2020 Feb;66(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-01015-4. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
Frequency of DNA end joining is not determined by the predamage spatial proximity of double-strand breaks in yeast.DNA 末端连接的频率并不取决于酵母中双链断裂的预损伤空间接近程度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 7;116(19):9481-9490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818595116. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
9
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mhr1 can bind Xho I-induced mitochondrial DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.酿酒酵母 Mhr1 可在体内结合 Xho I 诱导的线粒体 DNA 双链断裂。
Mitochondrion. 2018 Sep;42:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
过氧化氢酶在出芽酵母酿酒酵母暴露于电离辐射后的细胞反应中的重要作用。
Curr Microbiol. 2015 Mar;70(3):404-7. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0733-2. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
4
Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair.DNA双链断裂的来源及重组性DNA修复模型。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 Aug 7;6(9):a016428. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016428.
5
Non-homologous end joining often uses microhomology: implications for alternative end joining.非同源末端连接经常使用微同源性:对替代末端连接的影响。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2014 May;17:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
6
Cell cycle regulation of homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.酿酒酵母中同源重组的细胞周期调控。
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014 Mar;38(2):172-84. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12066. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
The C-terminus of Nej1 is critical for nuclear localization and non-homologous end-joining.Nej1 的 C 端对于核定位和非同源末端连接至关重要。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2014 Feb;14:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
8
Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination.通过同源重组修复链断裂。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Nov 1;5(11):a012740. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012740.
9
Controlling DNA-end resection: a new task for CDKs.控制 DNA 末端切除:CDKs 的新任务。
Front Genet. 2013 Jun 3;4:99. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00099. eCollection 2013.
10
A multistep genomic screen identifies new genes required for repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.一个多步骤的基因组筛选鉴定了酿酒酵母中修复 DNA 双链断裂所需的新基因。
BMC Genomics. 2013 Apr 15;14:251. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-251.