Datalys Center for Sports Injury Research and Prevention Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt Sports Concussion Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jul 1;170(7):647-53. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0073.
To our knowledge, little research has examined concussion across the youth/adolescent spectrum and even less has examined concussion-related outcomes (ie, symptoms and return to play).
To examine and compare sport-related concussion outcomes (symptoms and return to play) in youth, high school, and collegiate football athletes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Athletic trainers attended each practice and game during the 2012 to 2014 seasons and reported injuries. For this descriptive, epidemiological study, data were collected from youth, high school, and collegiate football teams, and the analysis of the data was conducted between July 2015 and September 2015. The Youth Football Surveillance System included more than 3000 youth football athletes aged 5 to 14 years from 118 teams, providing 310 team seasons (ie, 1 team providing 1 season of data). The National Athletic Treatment, Injury, and Outcomes Network Program included 96 secondary school football programs, providing 184 team seasons. The National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance Program included 34 college football programs, providing 71 team seasons.
We calculated the mean number of symptoms, prevalence of each symptom, and the proportion of patients with concussions that had long return-to-play time (ie, required participation restriction of at least 30 days). Generalized linear models were used to assess differences among competition levels in the mean number of reported symptoms. Logistic regression models estimated the odds of return to play at less than 24 hours and at least 30 days.
Overall, 1429 sports-related concussions were reported among youth, high school, and college-level football athletes with a mean (SD) of 5.48 (3.06) symptoms. Across all levels, 15.3% resulted return to play at least 30 days after the concussion and 3.1% resulted in return to play less than 24 hours after the concussion. Compared with youth, a higher number of concussion symptoms were reported in high school athletes (β = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.55-2.24). Compared with college athletes, the odds of return to play at least 30 days after injury were larger in youth athletes (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.10- 6.85) and high school athletes (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.61-5.19). The odds of return to play less than 24 hours after injury were larger in youth athletes than high school athletes (odds ratio, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.02-37.98).
Differences in concussion-related outcomes existed by level of competition and may be attributable to genetic, biologic, and/or developmental differences or level-specific variations in concussion-related policies and protocols, athlete training management, and athlete disclosure. Given the many organizational, social environmental, and policy-related differences at each level of competition that were not measured in this study, further study is warranted to validate our findings.
据我们所知,很少有研究涉及青少年和青少年的脑震荡问题,甚至更少研究与脑震荡相关的结果(即症状和重返赛场)。
检查和比较青年、高中和大学足球运动员的与运动相关的脑震荡结果(症状和重返赛场)。
设计、地点和参与者:在 2012 年至 2014 年期间,体能训练师参加了每个练习和比赛,并报告了受伤情况。在这项描述性、流行病学研究中,数据来自青年、高中和大学足球队,数据分析于 2015 年 7 月至 2015 年 9 月进行。青年足球监测系统包括来自 118 支球队的 3000 多名 5 至 14 岁的青年足球运动员,提供 310 个团队赛季(即 1 个团队提供 1 个赛季的数据)。国家体育治疗、损伤和结果网络项目包括 96 个中学足球项目,提供 184 个团队赛季。全国大学生体育协会损伤监测计划包括 34 个大学足球项目,提供 71 个团队赛季。
我们计算了报告症状的平均数量、每种症状的流行率以及需要至少 30 天的限制参与(即需要至少 30 天的限制参与)的脑震荡患者的比例。广义线性模型用于评估不同竞争水平之间报告症状平均数量的差异。逻辑回归模型估计了在 24 小时内和至少 30 天内重返赛场的可能性。
在青年、高中和大学足球运动员中,共报告了 1429 例与运动相关的脑震荡,平均(SD)有 5.48(3.06)个症状。在所有级别中,15.3%的患者在脑震荡后至少 30 天重返赛场,3.1%的患者在脑震荡后 24 小时内重返赛场。与青年相比,高中运动员报告的脑震荡症状数量更高(β=1.39;95%CI,0.55-2.24)。与大学运动员相比,青年运动员(比值比,2.75;95%CI,1.10-6.85)和高中运动员(比值比,2.89;95%CI,1.61-5.19)重返赛场的几率更大。青年运动员重返赛场的时间少于 24 小时的几率大于高中运动员(比值比,6.23;95%CI,1.02-37.98)。
竞争水平的差异存在与脑震荡相关的结果,可能归因于遗传、生物学和/或发育差异或与脑震荡相关的政策和协议、运动员训练管理和运动员披露的特定于水平的差异。鉴于本研究未测量每个竞争水平的许多组织、社会环境和政策相关差异,需要进一步研究来验证我们的发现。