Langevin Pierre, Frémont Pierre, Fait Philippe, Roy Jean-Sébastien
Clinique Cortex and Physio Interactive, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Oct 12;10(10):23259671221127049. doi: 10.1177/23259671221127049. eCollection 2022 Oct.
The Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) is used to assess the number and intensity of symptoms after a concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. However, its responsiveness to monitor clinical recovery has yet to be determined.
To evaluate the responsiveness of the PCSS to change and longitudinal validity in patients with persistent postconcussive symptoms as well as to explore the responsiveness of other clinical outcome measures to monitor recovery of physical symptoms in patients with persistent postconcussive symptoms.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Patients with persistent symptoms after a concussion (N = 109) were evaluated using self-reported questionnaires at baseline and after a 6-week rehabilitation program. The program consisted of an individualized symptom-limited aerobic exercise program combined with education. Questionnaires included the PCSS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) related to 1) neck pain and 2) headache. Internal responsiveness was evaluated using the effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM), and external responsiveness was determined with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculated using a receiver operating characteristic curve. The global rating of change was used as the external criterion. Pearson correlations were used to determine the longitudinal validity.
The PCSS was highly responsive (ES and SRM, >1.3) and had an MCID of 26.5 points (of 132) for the total score and 5.5 (of 22) for the number of symptoms. For longitudinal validity, low to moderate correlations were found between changes in PCSS and changes in NDI, HDI, and DHI. The NDI, HDI, DHI, and NPRS were also highly responsive (ES and SRM, >0.8).
All questionnaires including the PCSS were highly responsive and can be used with confidence by clinicians and researchers to evaluate change over time in a concussion population with persistent symptoms.
脑震荡后症状量表(PCSS)用于评估脑震荡/轻度创伤性脑损伤后的症状数量和严重程度。然而,其监测临床恢复情况的反应性尚未确定。
评估PCSS在持续性脑震荡后症状患者中的变化反应性和纵向效度,并探讨其他临床结局指标在监测持续性脑震荡后症状患者身体症状恢复方面的反应性。
队列研究(诊断);证据等级,2级。
对109例脑震荡后有持续性症状的患者在基线时和经过为期6周的康复计划后使用自我报告问卷进行评估。该计划包括个性化的症状限制有氧运动计划并结合健康教育。问卷包括PCSS、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、头痛残疾量表(HDI)、头晕残障量表(DHI)以及与1)颈部疼痛和2)头痛相关的数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)。使用效应量(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM)评估内部反应性,通过使用受试者工作特征曲线计算的最小临床重要差异(MCID)确定外部反应性。将整体变化评分用作外部标准。使用Pearson相关性来确定纵向效度。
PCSS具有高反应性(ES和SRM,>1.3),总分的MCID为26.5分(满分132分),症状数量的MCID为5.5分(满分22分)。对于纵向效度,在PCSS的变化与NDI、HDI和DHI的变化之间发现了低到中度的相关性。NDI、HDI、DHI和NPRS也具有高反应性(ES和SRM,>0.8)。
包括PCSS在内的所有问卷都具有高反应性,临床医生和研究人员可以放心使用这些问卷来评估有持续性症状的脑震荡人群随时间的变化情况。