Gjeraa K, Møller T P, Østergaard D
Danish Institute for Medical Simulation, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark and Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Aug;58(7):775-87. doi: 10.1111/aas.12336. Epub 2014 May 14.
Trauma resuscitation is a complex situation, and most organisations have multi-professional trauma teams. Non-technical skills are challenged during trauma resuscitation, and they play an important role in the prevention of critical incidents. Simulation-based training of these is recommended. Our research question was: Does simulation-based trauma team training of non-technical skills have effect on reaction, learning, behaviour or patient outcome? The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library and found 13 studies eligible for analysis. We described and compared the educational interventions and the evaluations of effect according to the four Kirkpatrick levels: reaction, learning (knowledge, skills, attitudes), behaviour (in a clinical setting) and patient outcome. No studies were randomised, controlled and blinded, resulting in a moderate to high risk of bias. The multi-professional trauma teams had positive reactions to simulation-based training of non-technical skills. Knowledge and skills improved in all studies evaluating the effect on learning. Three studies found improvements in team performance (behaviour) in the clinical setting. One of these found difficulties in maintaining these skills. Two studies evaluated on patient outcome, of which none showed improvements in mortality, complication rate or duration of hospitalisation. A significant effect on learning was found after simulation-based training of the multi-professional trauma team in non-technical skills. Three studies demonstrated significantly increased clinical team performance. No effect on patient outcome was found. All studies had a moderate to high risk of bias. More comprehensive randomised studies are needed to evaluate the effect on patient outcome.
创伤复苏是一种复杂的情况,大多数机构都有多专业的创伤团队。在创伤复苏过程中,非技术技能面临挑战,且它们在预防严重事件中发挥着重要作用。建议对这些技能进行基于模拟的培训。我们的研究问题是:基于模拟的非技术技能创伤团队培训对反应、学习、行为或患者结局是否有影响?作者检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,发现有13项研究符合分析条件。我们根据柯克帕特里克的四个层次描述并比较了教育干预措施及其效果评估:反应、学习(知识、技能、态度)、行为(在临床环境中)和患者结局。没有研究是随机、对照和双盲的,导致存在中度到高度的偏倚风险。多专业创伤团队对基于模拟的非技术技能培训有积极反应。在所有评估对学习影响的研究中,知识和技能都有所提高。三项研究发现临床环境中的团队表现(行为)有所改善。其中一项研究发现维持这些技能存在困难。两项研究评估了患者结局,其中没有一项显示死亡率、并发症发生率或住院时间有所改善。对多专业创伤团队进行基于模拟的非技术技能培训后,发现对学习有显著影响。三项研究表明临床团队表现显著提高。未发现对患者结局有影响。所有研究都有中度到高度的偏倚风险。需要更全面的随机研究来评估对患者结局的影响。