Eisenbarth W, Pado U, Schriever S, Schötschel D, Feucht N, MacKeben M
Hochschule München, Lothstr. 34, 80335, München, Deutschland.
Fachgebiet Computerlinguistik, Hochschule für Technik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Ophthalmologe. 2016 Sep;113(9):754-62. doi: 10.1007/s00347-016-0252-6.
Reading performance that can be measured by reading tests depends on whether reading material with or without contextual continuity is used.
The goal of this study was to create a German version of the SKread test and to evaluate it in a clinical setting.
The evaluation of the SKread test was first performed on two groups of visually healthy subjects of different ages: a junior group of 25 persons with ages between 20 and 30 years (mean = 25.84 years, SD ± 2.41 years) and a senior group of 25 persons with ages between 51 and 84 years (mean = 62.40 ± 8.46 years). The same measurements were also performed on a group of 18 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with ages between 75 and 95 years (mean = 81.89 ± 5.48 years). The reading performance was also measured using Radner charts.
Using reading material without syntactic continuity considerably slowed down the reading speed and increased the error rate. Median reading rates of 11.53 characters/s (CPS) for the junior group and 8.96 CPS for the senior group were clearly lower than those for the Radner charts (22.02 CPS and 18.48 CPS, respectively). In the AMD patients, a statistical analysis of the error rates showed a highly significant difference between the Radner charts and the SKread test (p = 0.00014). Furthermore, by analyzing the errors made in the SKread test information could be obtained about the position of central scotomas. The test-retest reliability of the SKread was very good.
Information about the position of a central scotoma can be acquired by using the SKread test and an analysis of reading errors, which can augment effective clinical monitoring in AMD and subsequent visual rehabilitation.
通过阅读测试衡量的阅读表现取决于是否使用具有或不具有上下文连贯性的阅读材料。
本研究的目的是创建SKread测试的德语版本,并在临床环境中对其进行评估。
首先在两组不同年龄的视力健康受试者中对SKread测试进行评估:一组为25名年龄在20至30岁之间的青年组(平均 = 25.84岁,标准差±2.41岁),另一组为25名年龄在51至84岁之间的老年组(平均 = 62.40±8.46岁)。还对一组18名年龄在75至95岁之间(平均 = 81.89±5.48岁)的年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者进行了相同的测量。阅读表现也使用拉德纳图表进行测量。
使用没有句法连贯性的阅读材料会显著减慢阅读速度并增加错误率。青年组的中位数阅读速度为11.53个字符/秒(CPS),老年组为8.96 CPS,明显低于拉德纳图表的阅读速度(分别为22.02 CPS和18.48 CPS)。在AMD患者中,对错误率的统计分析显示,拉德纳图表和SKread测试之间存在高度显著差异(p = 0.00014)。此外,通过分析SKread测试中出现的错误,可以获得有关中心暗点位置的信息。SKread测试的重测信度非常好。
通过使用SKread测试和对阅读错误的分析,可以获取有关中心暗点位置的信息,这可以加强对AMD的有效临床监测及后续的视力康复。