Lim Jisok, Pearman Miriam, Park Wonil, Alkatan Mohammed, Tanaka Hirofumi
Cardiovascular Aging Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2016 Sep;29(9):1024-8. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpw045. Epub 2016 May 3.
A number of different techniques and methodologies have been applied to quantify stiffness of arteries. Because measures of arterial stiffness differ in regards to measurement locations as well as properties, it is not clear how well these measures that are supposed to reflect the same arterial wall properties are related.
Interrelationships between different measures of arterial stiffness were evaluated in 50 apparently healthy subjects varying in age.
Significant relations ranging from mild to strong were observed among measures of arterial stiffness while some measures were not significantly associated. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) was significantly associated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). Ultrasound-derived measures of arterial stiffness (e.g., compliance, distensibility) were weakly or not significantly related to pulse wave velocity (PWV) measures. The limits of agreement between each of arterial stiffness measures based on the Bland-Altman analyses indicate that there were close agreements (CI = 1.12-1.52) between CAVI, cfPWV, and baPWV. However, agreements between PWV measures and ultrasound-derived measures were mild to moderate. β-stiffness index demonstrated large 95% CIs with other measures. When associations between relative changes in various measures of arterial stiffness in response to isometric handgrip exercise were evaluated, the general trend of associations was similar to the relations observed at rest. β-stiffness index was not related to most measures of arterial stiffness.
These results suggest that the techniques used to assess arterial stiffness may not be interchangeable in clinical and research settings and that comparisons of findings obtained with different arterial stiffness measures should be conducted with caution.
已经应用了许多不同的技术和方法来量化动脉僵硬度。由于动脉僵硬度的测量在测量位置和特性方面存在差异,尚不清楚这些本应反映相同动脉壁特性的测量之间的关联程度如何。
在50名年龄各异的明显健康受试者中评估了不同动脉僵硬度测量指标之间的相互关系。
在动脉僵硬度测量指标之间观察到了从轻度到强的显著关系,而一些指标之间没有显著关联。心踝血管指数(CAVI)与颈股脉搏波速度(cfPWV)和臂踝脉搏波速度(baPWV)显著相关。超声衍生的动脉僵硬度测量指标(如顺应性、扩张性)与脉搏波速度(PWV)测量指标的相关性较弱或不显著。基于Bland-Altman分析的每种动脉僵硬度测量指标之间的一致性界限表明,CAVI、cfPWV和baPWV之间存在密切一致性(CI = 1.12 - 1.52)。然而,PWV测量指标与超声衍生测量指标之间的一致性为轻度到中度。β僵硬度指数与其他测量指标的95%置信区间较大。当评估等长握力运动后各种动脉僵硬度测量指标的相对变化之间的关联时,关联的总体趋势与静息时观察到的关系相似。β僵硬度指数与大多数动脉僵硬度测量指标无关。
这些结果表明,用于评估动脉僵硬度的技术在临床和研究环境中可能不可互换,并且在比较不同动脉僵硬度测量指标获得的结果时应谨慎进行。