• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在复杂进化模型下改进系统发育回归。

Improving phylogenetic regression under complex evolutionary models.

作者信息

Mazel Florent, Davies T Jonathan, Georges Damien, Lavergne Sébastien, Thuiller Wilfried, Peres-NetoO Pedro R

出版信息

Ecology. 2016 Feb;97(2):286-93. doi: 10.1890/15-0086.1.

DOI:10.1890/15-0086.1
PMID:27145604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5486445/
Abstract

Phylogenetic Generalized Least Square (PGLS) is the tool of choice among phylogenetic comparative methods to measure the correlation between species features such as morphological and life-history traits or niche characteristics. In its usual form, it assumes that the residual variation follows a homogenous model of evolution across the branches of the phylogenetic tree. Since a homogenous model of evolution is unlikely to be realistic in nature, we explored the robustness of the phylogenetic regression when this assumption is violated. We did so by simulating a set of traits under various heterogeneous models of evolution, and evaluating the statistical performance (type I error [the percentage of tests based on samples that incorrectly rejected a true null hypothesis] and power [the percentage of tests that correctly rejected a false null hypothesis]) of classical phylogenetic regression. We found that PGLS has good power but unacceptable type I error rates. This finding is important since this method has been increasingly used in comparative analyses over the last decade. To address this issue, we propose a simple solution based on transforming the underlying variance-covariance matrix to adjust for model heterogeneity within PGLS. We suggest that heterogeneous rates of evolution might be particularly prevalent in large phylogenetic trees, while most current approaches assume a homogenous rate of evolution. Our analysis demonstrates that overlooking rate heterogeneity can result in inflated type I errors, thus misleading comparative analyses. We show that it is possible to correct for this bias even when the underlying model of evolution is not known a priori.

摘要

系统发育广义最小二乘法(PGLS)是系统发育比较方法中用于衡量物种特征(如形态和生活史特征或生态位特征)之间相关性的首选工具。在其通常形式中,它假设残差变异遵循系统发育树各分支上的同质进化模型。由于同质进化模型在自然界中不太可能是现实的,我们探讨了违反这一假设时系统发育回归的稳健性。我们通过在各种异质进化模型下模拟一组性状,并评估经典系统发育回归的统计性能(I型错误[基于样本错误拒绝真零假设的测试百分比]和检验功效[正确拒绝假零假设的测试百分比])来做到这一点。我们发现PGLS具有良好的功效,但I型错误率不可接受。这一发现很重要,因为在过去十年中,这种方法在比较分析中越来越多地被使用。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个简单的解决方案,即基于变换潜在的方差协方差矩阵来调整PGLS中的模型异质性。我们认为,进化速率的异质性在大型系统发育树中可能特别普遍,而目前大多数方法都假设进化速率是同质的。我们的分析表明,忽略速率异质性会导致I型错误膨胀,从而误导比较分析。我们表明,即使事先不知道潜在的进化模型,也有可能纠正这种偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d1e/5486445/7c6d5c49775c/emss-73200-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d1e/5486445/f164a0474fee/emss-73200-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d1e/5486445/4c546fab4876/emss-73200-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d1e/5486445/7c6d5c49775c/emss-73200-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d1e/5486445/f164a0474fee/emss-73200-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d1e/5486445/4c546fab4876/emss-73200-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d1e/5486445/7c6d5c49775c/emss-73200-f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving phylogenetic regression under complex evolutionary models.在复杂进化模型下改进系统发育回归。
Ecology. 2016 Feb;97(2):286-93. doi: 10.1890/15-0086.1.
2
Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.评估几种检测进化趋势的方法的相对优点。
Syst Biol. 2010 Dec;59(6):689-704. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq059. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
3
Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.比较数据中系统发育信号的检测:行为特征更不稳定。
Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x.
4
A Bayesian extension of phylogenetic generalized least squares: Incorporating uncertainty in the comparative study of trait relationships and evolutionary rates.贝叶斯拓展的系统发生广义最小二乘法:纳入性状关系和进化速率比较研究中的不确定性。
Evolution. 2020 Feb;74(2):311-325. doi: 10.1111/evo.13899. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
A Tale of Too Many Trees: A Conundrum for Phylogenetic Regression.树木过多的故事:系统发育回归的难题
Mol Biol Evol. 2025 Mar 5;42(3). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf032.
6
ImOSM: intermittent evolution and robustness of phylogenetic methods.ImOSM:系统发育方法的间歇性进化和稳健性。
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Feb;29(2):663-73. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr220. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
7
Taxonomy and Phylogeny Can Yield Comparable Results in Comparative Paleontological Analyses.在比较古生物学分析中,分类学和系统发育学可产生可比的结果。
Syst Biol. 2015 Jul;64(4):608-20. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv015. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
8
PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY.连续性状相关进化的系统发育分析:一项模拟研究
Evolution. 1991 May;45(3):534-557. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04328.x.
9
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods for Evaluating the Evolutionary History of Function-Valued Traits.用于评估功能值性状进化历史的系统发育比较方法。
Syst Biol. 2015 Jul;64(4):568-78. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv012. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Likelihood-Based Parameter Estimation for High-Dimensional Phylogenetic Comparative Models: Overcoming the Limitations of "Distance-Based" Methods.基于似然的高维系统发育比较模型参数估计:克服“基于距离”方法的局限性。
Syst Biol. 2016 Sep;65(5):852-70. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw051. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Discriminating models of trait evolution.性状进化的判别模型。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 13:2025.06.12.659377. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.12.659377.
2
A Tale of Too Many Trees: A Conundrum for Phylogenetic Regression.树木过多的故事:系统发育回归的难题
Mol Biol Evol. 2025 Mar 5;42(3). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf032.
3
TraitTrainR: accelerating large-scale simulation under models of continuous trait evolution.TraitTrainR:加速连续性状进化模型下的大规模模拟
Bioinform Adv. 2024 Dec 9;5(1):vbae196. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae196. eCollection 2025.
4
Robust Phylogenetic Regression.稳健的系统发育回归。
Syst Biol. 2024 May 27;73(1):140-157. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syad070.
5
On the Origins of Phenotypic Parallelism in Benthic and Limnetic Stickleback.底栖和湖泊型刺鱼的表型并行性起源
Mol Biol Evol. 2023 Sep 1;40(9). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad191.
6
Heterotrophic eukaryotes show a slow-fast continuum, not a gleaner-exploiter trade-off.异养真核生物表现出慢-快连续体,而不是清道夫-剥削者的权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 6;117(40):24893-24899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008370117. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Tritrophic interactions follow phylogenetic escalation and climatic adaptation.三营养层相互作用遵循系统发育进化和气候适应。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 7;10(1):2074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59068-2.
8
Evolutionary history predicts the response of tree species to forest loss: A case study in peninsular Spain.进化历史预测树种对森林损失的响应:以西班牙半岛为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0204365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204365. eCollection 2018.
9
Explaining naturalization and invasiveness: new insights from historical ornamental plant catalogs.解释归化和入侵性:来自历史观赏植物目录的新见解。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 15;6(20):7188-7198. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2471. eCollection 2016 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting a Key Innovation in Evolutionary Biology: Felsenstein's "Phylogenies and the Comparative Method".重温进化生物学的一个关键创新:费雪斯坦的“系统发育与比较方法”。
Am Nat. 2019 Jun;193(6):755-772. doi: 10.1086/703055. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
2
Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution.系统发育比较分析:一种适应性进化的建模方法。
Am Nat. 2004 Dec;164(6):683-695. doi: 10.1086/426002.
3
STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION.稳定选择与适应性的比较分析
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1341-1351. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x.
4
A METHOD FOR TESTING THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF TWO BINARY CHARACTERS: ARE GAINS OR LOSSES CONCENTRATED ON CERTAIN BRANCHES OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE?一种检测两个二元性状相关进化的方法:性状的获得或丧失是否集中在系统发育树的某些分支上?
Evolution. 1990 May;44(3):539-557. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05937.x.
5
AN EIGENVECTOR METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PHYLOGENETIC INERTIA.一种估计系统发育惯性的特征向量方法。
Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1247-1262. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02006.x.
6
METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY.进化生物学中比较数据的分析方法。
Evolution. 1991 Aug;45(5):1065-1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04375.x.
7
Phylogenetic patterns of climatic, habitat and trophic niches in a European avian assemblage.欧洲鸟类群落中气候、栖息地和营养生态位的系统发育模式。
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014 Apr 1;23(4):414-424. doi: 10.1111/geb.12127.
8
Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments.被子植物辐射到冰冻环境中的三个关键。
Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):89-92. doi: 10.1038/nature12872. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
9
The global diversity of birds in space and time.鸟类在时间和空间上的全球多样性。
Nature. 2012 Nov 15;491(7424):444-8. doi: 10.1038/nature11631. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
10
Improved testing of species traits--environment relationships in the fourth-corner problem.改进第四边角问题中物种特征-环境关系的测试。
Ecology. 2012 Jul;93(7):1525-6. doi: 10.1890/12-0126.1.