Streiff Cole, Zhu Meihua, Shimada Eriko, Sahn David J, Ashraf Muhammad
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0153634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153634. eCollection 2016.
This study compared the variability of 3D echo derived circumferential and longitudinal strain values computed from vendor-specific and vendor-independent analyses of images acquired using ultrasound systems from different vendors.
Ten freshly harvested porcine hearts were studied. Each heart was mounted on a custom designed phantom and driven to simulate normal cardiac motion. Cardiac rotation was digitally controlled and held constant at 5°, while pumped stroke volume (SV) ranged from 30-70ml. Full-volume image data was acquired using three different ultrasound systems from different vendors. The image data was analyzed for longitudinal and circumferential strains (LS, CS) using both vendor-specific and vendor-independent analysis packages.
Good linear relationships were observed for each vendor-specific analysis package for both CS and LS at the mid-anterior segment, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.82-0.91 (CS) and 0.86-0.89 (LS). Comparable linear regressions were observed for results determined by a vendor independent program (CS: R = 0.82-0.89; LS: R = 0.86-0.89). Variability between analysis packages was examined via a series of ANOVA tests. A statistical difference was found between vendor-specific analysis packages (p<0.001), while no such difference was observed between ultrasound systems when using the vendor-independent program (p>0.05).
Circumferential and longitudinal regional strain values differ when quantified by vendor-specific analysis packages; however, this variability is mitigated by use of a vendor-independent quantification method. These results suggest that echocardiograms acquired using different ultrasound systems could be meaningfully compared using vendor-independent software.
本研究比较了通过对使用不同供应商超声系统采集的图像进行特定供应商分析和独立于供应商的分析所计算出的三维超声心动图衍生的圆周应变和纵向应变值的变异性。
对10个新鲜摘取的猪心脏进行研究。每个心脏安装在定制的模型上,驱动以模拟正常心脏运动。心脏旋转通过数字控制并保持在5°不变,而泵血搏出量(SV)范围为30 - 70ml。使用来自不同供应商的三种不同超声系统采集全容积图像数据。使用特定供应商和独立于供应商的分析软件包对图像数据进行纵向和圆周应变(LS,CS)分析。
在前中段,每个特定供应商分析软件包对CS和LS均观察到良好的线性关系,相关系数范围为0.82 - 0.91(CS)和0.86 - 0.89(LS)。由独立于供应商的程序确定的结果观察到类似的线性回归(CS:R = 0.82 - 0.89;LS:R = 0.86 - 0.89)。通过一系列方差分析测试检查分析软件包之间的变异性。发现特定供应商分析软件包之间存在统计学差异(p<0.001),而使用独立于供应商的程序时,超声系统之间未观察到此类差异(p>0.05)。
通过特定供应商分析软件包量化时,圆周和纵向区域应变值不同;然而,使用独立于供应商的量化方法可减轻这种变异性。这些结果表明,使用独立于供应商的软件可以对使用不同超声系统采集的超声心动图进行有意义的比较。