Suppr超能文献

体格检查用于髋关节撞击综合征诊断的研究进展:系统综述

Physical examination tests for the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement. A systematic review.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, C/ Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, Ampliación Campus Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, Spain.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, C/ Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, Ampliación Campus Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2016 Sep;21:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Numerous clinical tests have been proposed to diagnose FAI, but little is known about their diagnostic accuracy.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize and evaluate research on the accuracy of physical examination tests for diagnosis of FAI.

METHODS

A search of the PubMed, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases was performed. Studies were considered eligible if they compared the results of physical examination tests to those of a reference standard. Methodological quality and internal validity assessment was performed by two independent reviewers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool.

RESULTS

The systematic search strategy revealed 298 potential articles, five of which articles met the inclusion criteria. After assessment using the QUADAS score, four of the five articles were of high quality. Clinical tests included were Impingement sign, IROP test (Internal Rotation Over Pressure), FABER test (Flexion-Abduction-External Rotation), Stinchfield/RSRL (Resisted Straight Leg Raise) test, Scour test, Maximal squat test, and the Anterior Impingement test. IROP test, impingement sign, and FABER test showed the most sensitive values to identify FAI.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of physical examination tests to assess FAI is limited due to its heterogenecity. There is a strong need for sound research of high methodological quality in this area.

摘要

目的

总结和评估体格检查试验诊断 FAI 的准确性研究。

方法

对 PubMed、SPORTDiscus 和 CINAHL 数据库进行检索。如果体格检查试验的结果与参考标准进行了比较,则认为研究符合纳入标准。使用 QUADAS 工具,由两名独立的评审员对方法学质量和内部有效性进行评估。

结果

系统搜索策略共显示 298 篇潜在文章,其中 5 篇文章符合纳入标准。使用 QUADAS 评分进行评估后,5 篇文章中有 4 篇为高质量。纳入的临床检查包括撞击征、IROP 试验(内旋过压)、FABER 试验(屈曲-外展-外旋)、Stinchfield/RSRL(阻力直腿抬高)试验、扫刮试验、最大下蹲试验和前撞击试验。IROP 试验、撞击征和 FABER 试验对识别 FAI 的敏感性最高。

结论

由于其异质性,体格检查试验评估 FAI 的诊断准确性有限。在该领域,非常需要进行高质量的严谨研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验