Reiman Michael P, Thorborg Kristian, Goode Adam P, Cook Chad E, Weir Adam, Hölmich Per
Duke University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sports Orthopedic Research Centre-Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2665-2677. doi: 10.1177/0363546516686960. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
Diagnosing femoroacetabular impingement/acetabular labral tear (FAI/ALT) and subsequently making a decision regarding surgery are based primarily on diagnostic imaging and intra-articular hip joint injection techniques of unknown accuracy.
Summarize and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of various imaging modalities and injection techniques relevant to hip FAI/ALT.
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
A computer-assisted literature search was conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases using keywords related to diagnostic accuracy of hip joint pathologic changes. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for the search and reporting phases of the study. Quality assessment of bias and applicability was conducted using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Random effects models were used to summarize sensitivities (SN), specificities (SP), likelihood ratios (+LR and -LR), diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and respective confidence intervals (CI).
The search strategy and assessment for risk of bias revealed 25 articles scoring above 10/14 on the items of the QUADAS. Four studies investigated FAI, and the data were not pooled. Twenty articles on ALT qualified for meta-analysis. Pretest probability of ALT in the studies in this review was 81% (72%-88%), while the pretest probability of FAI diagnosis was 74% (95% CI, 51%-91%). The meta-analysis showed that computed tomography arthrography (CTA) demonstrated the strongest overall diagnostic accuracy: pooled SN 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96); SP 0.89 (95% CI, 0.74-0.97); +LR 6.28 (95% CI, 2.78-14.21); -LR 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06-0.21); and DOR 64.38 (95% CI, 19.17-216.21).
High pretest probability of disease was demonstrated. Positive imaging findings increased the probability that a labral tear existed by a minimal to small degree with the use of magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiogram (MRI/MRA) and ultrasound (US) and by a moderate degree for CTA. Negative imaging findings decreased the probability that a labral tear existed by a minimal degree with the use of MRI and US, a small to moderate degree with MRA, and a moderate degree with CTA.
Although findings of the included studies suggested potentially favorable use of these modalities for the diagnosis of ALT and FAI, our results suggest that these findings have limited generalizability and clinical utility given very high pretest prevalence, large confidence intervals, and selection criteria of the studies. Registration: PROSPERO Registration #CRD42015027745.
诊断股骨髋臼撞击症/髋臼盂唇撕裂(FAI/ALT)并随后做出手术决策主要基于诊断性影像学检查和准确性未知的髋关节腔内注射技术。
总结并评估与髋关节FAI/ALT相关的各种影像学检查方法和注射技术的诊断准确性及临床实用性。
系统评价并进行荟萃分析。
使用与髋关节病理改变诊断准确性相关的关键词,对MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE数据库进行计算机辅助文献检索。本研究的检索和报告阶段遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析优先报告项目)指南。使用诊断准确性研究质量(QUADAS)工具对偏倚和适用性进行质量评估。采用随机效应模型汇总敏感度(SN)、特异度(SP)、似然比(+LR和-LR)、诊断比值比(DOR)及其各自的置信区间(CI)。
检索策略和偏倚风险评估显示,25篇文章在QUADAS项目上得分高于10/14。四项研究调查了FAI,数据未进行汇总。20篇关于ALT的文章符合荟萃分析的条件。本综述中各项研究中ALT的验前概率为81%(72%-88%),而FAI诊断的验前概率为74%(95%CI,51%-91%)。荟萃分析表明,计算机断层扫描关节造影(CTA)显示出最强的总体诊断准确性:汇总SN为0.91(95%CI,0.83-0.96);SP为0.89(95%CI,0.74-0.97);+LR为6.28(95%CI,2.78-14.21);-LR为0.11(95%CI,0.06-0.21);DOR为64.38(95%CI,19.17-216.21)。
疾病的验前概率较高。使用磁共振成像/磁共振血管造影(MRI/MRA)和超声(US)时,阳性影像学检查结果使盂唇撕裂存在的概率有最小至轻度增加,而使用CTA时则有中度增加。使用MRI和US时,阴性影像学检查结果使盂唇撕裂存在的概率有最小程度降低,使用MRA时有小至中度降低,使用CTA时有中度降低。
尽管纳入研究的结果表明这些检查方法在诊断ALT和FAI方面可能有良好的应用前景,但鉴于验前患病率非常高、置信区间大以及研究的选择标准,我们的结果表明这些发现的普遍性和临床实用性有限。注册信息:PROSPERO注册号#CRD42015027745