Suppr超能文献

是夫妻间的沟通能够预测婚姻满意度,还是婚姻满意度能够预测沟通情况?

Does Couples' Communication Predict Marital Satisfaction, or Does Marital Satisfaction Predict Communication?

作者信息

Lavner Justin A, Karney Benjamin R, Bradbury Thomas N

机构信息

University of Georgia.

University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

J Marriage Fam. 2016 Jun 1;78(3):680-694. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12301. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

Abstract

The quality of communication between spouses is widely assumed to affect their subsequent judgments of relationship satisfaction, yet this assumption is rarely tested against the alternative prediction that communication is merely a consequence of spouses' prior levels of satisfaction. To evaluate these perspectives, newlywed couples' positivity, negativity, and effectiveness were observed four times at 9-month intervals and these behaviors were examined in relation to corresponding self-reports of relationship satisfaction. Cross-sectionally, relatively satisfied couples engaged in more positive, less negative, and more effective communication. Longitudinally, reliable communication-to-satisfaction and satisfaction-to-communication associations were identified, yet neither pathway was particularly robust. These findings raise important doubts about theories and interventions that prioritize couple communication skills as the key predictor of relationship satisfaction, while raising new questions about other factors that might predict communication and satisfaction and that strengthen or moderate their association.

摘要

人们普遍认为配偶之间的沟通质量会影响他们随后对关系满意度的判断,但这一假设很少与另一种预测进行对比检验,即沟通仅仅是配偶先前满意度水平的结果。为了评估这些观点,每隔9个月对新婚夫妇的积极性、消极性和有效性进行了4次观察,并将这些行为与相应的关系满意度自我报告进行了对照研究。从横断面来看,相对满意的夫妻会进行更积极、更少消极且更有效的沟通。从纵向来看,确定了沟通与满意度以及满意度与沟通之间可靠的关联,但这两条路径都不是特别稳固。这些发现对那些将夫妻沟通技巧作为关系满意度关键预测因素的理论和干预措施提出了重要质疑,同时也引发了关于其他可能预测沟通和满意度以及加强或调节它们之间关联的因素的新问题。

相似文献

1
Does Couples' Communication Predict Marital Satisfaction, or Does Marital Satisfaction Predict Communication?
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Jun 1;78(3):680-694. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12301. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
2
The Meta Marriage: Links Between Older Couples' Relationship Narratives and Marital Satisfaction.
Fam Process. 2017 Dec;56(4):900-914. doi: 10.1111/famp.12217. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Marital negativity's festering wounds: The emotional, immunological, and relational toll of couples' negative communication patterns.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023 Mar;149:105989. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105989. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
Finer Distinctions: Variability in Satisfied Older Couples' Problem-Solving Behaviors.
Fam Process. 2017 Jun;56(2):501-517. doi: 10.1111/famp.12198. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Intimate Partner Aggression and Marital Satisfaction: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Feb;36(3-4):NP1463-1481NP. doi: 10.1177/0886260517747607. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Gender-typed attributes and marital satisfaction among Mexican immigrant couples: A latent profile approach.
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Jun;29(3):321-30. doi: 10.1037/fam0000077. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
9
Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction.
J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 Oct-Dec;31(5):409-24. doi: 10.1080/00926230591006719.
10
Trajectories of Marital Satisfaction in Diverse Newlywed Couples.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Jul;11(5):597-604. doi: 10.1177/1948550619865056. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of social media addiction on self-esteem and life satisfaction among married couples.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1494-1501. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1808_24. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3
Development and validation of the relational behavior interactions scale for couples.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 6;14(1):8086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58901-2.
4
Acceptability and feasibility of an intervention for Alaska Native and American Indian couples.
Fam Relat. 2024 Feb;73(1):298-317. doi: 10.1111/fare.12986. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):453-465. doi: 10.1037/fam0001180. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Does income moderate basic relationship processes?
J Marriage Fam. 2023 Feb;85(1):72-91. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12877. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
8
Economic distress and perceptions of sexual intimacy in remarriage.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1056180. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056180. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
4
5
Common principles of couple therapy.
Behav Ther. 2012 Mar;43(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
6
Factor analysis of the Iowa family interaction rating scales.
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Dec;25(6):993-9. doi: 10.1037/a0025903. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
7
A two-dimensional approach to relationship conflict: meta-analytic findings.
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Jun;25(3):325-35. doi: 10.1037/a0023791.
9
Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: is it me, you, or us?
J Pers. 2008 Oct;76(5):1231-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00520.x. Epub 2008 Jul 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验