Rotholtz Nicolás A, Canelas Alejandro G, Bun Maximiliano E, Laporte Mariano, Sadava Emmanuel E, Ferrentino Natalia, Guckenheimer Sebastián A
Nicolás A Rotholtz, Alejandro G Canelas, Maximiliano E Bun, Mariano Laporte, Emmanuel E Sadava, Natalia Ferrentino, Sebastián A Guckenheimer, Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires C1118AAT, Argentina.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Apr 27;8(4):308-14. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i4.308.
To analyze the results of laparoscopic colectomy in complicated diverticular disease.
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic teaching hospital. Data were collected from a database established earlier, which comprise of all patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease between 2000 and 2013. The series was divided into two groups that were compared: Patients with complicated disease (abscess, perforation, fistula, or stenosis) (G1) and patients undergoing surgery for recurrent diverticulitis (G2). Recurrent diverticulitis was defined as two or more episodes of diverticulitis regardless of patient age. Data regarding patient demographics, comorbidities, prior abdominal operations, history of acute diverticulitis, classification of acute diverticulitis at index admission and intra and postoperative variables were extracted. Univariate analysis was performed in both groups.
Two hundred and sixty patients were included: 28% (72 patients) belonged to G1 and 72% (188 patients) to G2. The mean age was 57 (27-89) years. The average number of episodes of diverticulitis before surgery was 2.1 (r 0-10); 43 patients had no previous inflammatory pathology. There were significant differences between the two groups with respect to conversion rate and hospital stay (G1 18% vs G2 3.2%, P = 0.001; G1: 4.7 d vs G2 3.3 d, P < 0.001). The anastomotic dehiscence rate was 2.3%, with no statistical difference between the groups (G1 2.7% vs G2 2.1%, P = 0.5). There were no differences in demographic data (body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology and previous abdominal surgery), operative time and intraoperative and postoperative complications between the groups. The mortality rate was 0.38% (1 patient), represented by a death secondary to septic shock in G2.
The results support that the laparoscopic approach in any kind of complicated diverticular disease can be performed with low morbidity and acceptable conversion rates when compared with patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis.
分析腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室病的结果。
这是一项在学术教学医院进行的回顾性队列研究。数据来自早期建立的数据库,该数据库包含2000年至2013年间因憩室病接受腹腔镜结肠切除术的所有患者。该系列分为两组进行比较:患有复杂性疾病(脓肿、穿孔、瘘管或狭窄)的患者(G1组)和因复发性憩室炎接受手术的患者(G2组)。复发性憩室炎定义为憩室炎发作两次或更多次,不考虑患者年龄。提取有关患者人口统计学、合并症、既往腹部手术、急性憩室炎病史、首次入院时急性憩室炎分类以及术中和术后变量的数据。两组均进行单因素分析。
纳入260例患者:28%(72例)属于G1组,72%(188例)属于G2组。平均年龄为57(27 - 89)岁。手术前憩室炎发作的平均次数为2.1次(范围0 - 10次);43例患者既往无炎症性病变。两组在中转率和住院时间方面存在显著差异(G1组为18%,G2组为3.2%,P = 0.001;G1组:4.7天,G2组:3.3天,P < 0.001)。吻合口裂开率为2.3%,两组之间无统计学差异(G1组为2.7%,G2组为2.1%,P = 0.5)。两组在人口统计学数据(体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会分级和既往腹部手术情况)、手术时间以及术中和术后并发症方面无差异。死亡率为0.38%(1例患者),表现为G2组1例因感染性休克死亡。
结果表明,与因复发性憩室炎接受腹腔镜手术的患者相比,腹腔镜手术治疗任何类型的复杂性憩室病的发病率较低,中转率可接受。