Suppr超能文献

使用酶联免疫吸附测定法检测猪的猪痢疾密螺旋体感染。

Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Treponema hyodysenteriae infection in swine.

作者信息

Wright J C, Wilt G R, Reed R B, Powe T A

机构信息

Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Mar;27(3):411-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.3.411-416.1989.

Abstract

Discriminate analysis was used to evaluate the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of anti-Treponema hyodysenteriae antibodies in experimentally and naturally infected swine. In trial 1, 26 pigs were randomly divided into three groups (naturally infected, n = 8; experimentally infected, n = 11; and noninfected, n = 7), and samples were collected for 10 weeks. For trial 2, 31 pigs were randomly divided into two groups (naturally infected, n = 22; and noninfected, n = 7), and samples were collected for 20 weeks. Rectal swabs for T. hyodysenteriae isolation were collected daily, and fecal samples for isolation of Salmonella spp. were collected weekly. Serum samples for ELISA evaluation were collected biweekly (trial 1) or weekly (trial 2). Results of discriminate analysis indicated that the ELISA correctly identified 90% or more of the individually infected pigs at prior probabilities of infection ranging from 60 to 90%. The test correctly identified noninfected pigs at a lower rate (61 to 92% range). The mean ELISA titers of naturally infected pigs without clinical signs were not significantly different (P less than 0.05) from the titers of both groups of experimentally infected pigs. Mean ELISA titers of naturally infected pigs without clinical signs were significantly greater than the mean titers of naturally infected pigs with clinical signs. Naturally infected pigs with clinical signs had a mean ELISA titer that was significantly greater than that of noninfected pigs and significantly less than the mean titers of the experimentally infected pigs without clinical signs and the naturally infected pigs without clinical signs.

摘要

采用判别分析评估酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测实验感染和自然感染猪体内抗猪痢疾短螺旋体抗体的效果。在试验1中,将26头猪随机分为三组(自然感染组,n = 8;实验感染组,n = 11;未感染组,n = 7),并在10周内采集样本。在试验2中,将31头猪随机分为两组(自然感染组,n = 22;未感染组,n = 7),并在20周内采集样本。每天采集直肠拭子用于分离猪痢疾短螺旋体,每周采集粪便样本用于分离沙门氏菌属。每两周(试验1)或每周(试验2)采集血清样本用于ELISA评估。判别分析结果表明,在感染先验概率为60%至90%时,ELISA能正确识别90%或更多的个体感染猪。该检测正确识别未感染猪的比例较低(范围为61%至92%)。无临床症状的自然感染猪的ELISA平均滴度与两组实验感染猪的滴度无显著差异(P小于0.05)。无临床症状的自然感染猪的ELISA平均滴度显著高于有临床症状的自然感染猪的平均滴度。有临床症状的自然感染猪的ELISA平均滴度显著高于未感染猪的平均滴度,且显著低于无临床症状的实验感染猪和无临床症状的自然感染猪的平均滴度。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验