Suppr超能文献

生长迟缓(半骨骺钉合)与生长加速(骨膜切除术)作为改善羔羊模型引导性生长的一种方法。

Growth Retardation (Hemiepiphyseal Stapling) and Growth Acceleration (Periosteal Resection) as a Method to Improve Guided Growth in a Lamb Model.

作者信息

Noonan Kennett J, Halanski Matthew A, Leiferman Ellen, Wilsman Norman

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Jun;36(4):362-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000459.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guided growth corrects pediatric limb deformity by inhibiting growth on the convexity of the bone. Both modular and rigid implants have been used; we endeavor to determine whether a clear advantage of one implant exists. We further hypothesize that improved correction could be realized by accelerating growth with resection of the periosteum.

METHODS

Sixteen lambs underwent guided growth of the medial proximal tibia (the opposite limb served as a control). Group 1 used a rigid staple (n=5); group 2 a modular plate and screw construct (n=5), and group 3 had a similar device plus periosteal resection (n=6). Radiographs tracked the progression of deformity in the coronal plane. Before sacrifice, pulsed fluorochrome labels allowed for temporal and spatial growth rate analysis. At sacrifice, True Deformity was calculated (and compared with control tibia) from standardized radiographs in the coronal and sagittal planes. Device Efficiencies were normalized by dividing True Deformity produced (degrees) by the Expected Growth gain (mm) from the control limb.

RESULTS

Group 3 produced greater coronal plane deformity than group 1 by an average of 2.2 degrees per month (P=0.001) and group 2 by an average of 2.4 degrees per month (P=0.0007). At sacrifice, groups 1 and 2 were equally effective at limiting growth to 75% of control; no differences in growth retardation were noted. No differences in Device Efficiency were noted between groups 1 and 2. The Device Efficiency was significantly different between groups 1 and 2 with comparison with group 3 (P=0.05 and P=0.022); with a 2.5 degree/mm faster deformation in the stripped cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Rigid implants initially produced deformity quicker than modular constructs; yet ultimately, both implants were equally effective at guiding growth. Device Efficiency for the modular group improved significantly with the addition of periosteal stripping as method to accelerate growth.

摘要

背景

引导性生长通过抑制骨凸侧的生长来矫正儿童肢体畸形。模块化和刚性植入物均已被使用;我们致力于确定一种植入物是否具有明显优势。我们进一步假设,通过切除骨膜加速生长可以实现更好的矫正效果。

方法

16只羔羊接受内侧胫骨近端的引导性生长(对侧肢体作为对照)。第1组使用刚性钉(n = 5);第2组使用模块化钢板和螺钉结构(n = 5),第3组使用类似装置并进行骨膜切除(n = 6)。X线片跟踪冠状面畸形的进展。处死前,脉冲荧光标记用于进行时间和空间生长速率分析。处死时,根据冠状面和矢状面的标准化X线片计算真实畸形(并与对照胫骨进行比较)。通过将产生的真实畸形(度数)除以对照肢体预期的生长增加量(毫米)来对装置效率进行标准化。

结果

第3组冠状面畸形比第1组每月平均大2.2度(P = 0.001),比第2组每月平均大2.4度(P = 0.0007)。处死时,第1组和第2组在将生长限制在对照的75%方面同样有效;未观察到生长迟缓的差异。第1组和第2组之间的装置效率没有差异。第1组和第2组与第3组相比,装置效率有显著差异(P = 0.05和P = 0.022);在骨膜剥离组中,畸形变形速度快2.5度/毫米。

结论

刚性植入物最初产生畸形的速度比模块化结构更快;但最终,两种植入物在引导生长方面同样有效。模块化组的装置效率通过增加骨膜剥离作为加速生长的方法而显著提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验