Gorka Stephanie M, Lieberman Lynne, Phan K Luan, Shankman Stewart A
University of Illinois-Chicago, Department of Psychiatry, 1747 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL 60608, United States.
University of Illinois-Chicago, Department of Psychology, 1007 West Harrison St. (M/C 285), Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jul 1;164:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.034. Epub 2016 May 2.
Recent laboratory studies have shown that acute alcohol intoxication selectively and effectively dampens aversive responding to uncertain threat. An emerging hypothesis is that individuals who exhibit heightened reactivity to uncertain threat may be especially motivated to use alcohol to dampen their distress, setting the stage for negative reinforcement processes to drive excessive alcohol use. However, no study to date has directly examined whether current problematic drinkers exhibit heightened reactivity to uncertain threat as would be expected.
The present study was therefore designed to examine the association between current problematic alcohol use and reactivity to uncertain threat during sobriety in two, independent samples. In Study 1 (n=221) and Study 2 (n=74), adult participants completed the same well-validated threat-of-shock task which separately probes responses to temporally predictable and unpredictable threat. Startle potentiation was measured as an index of aversive responding. Problematic alcohol use was defined as number of binge episodes within the past 30days in Study 1 and total scores on a self-report measure of hazardous drinking in Study 2.
As hypothesized, across both studies greater levels of problematic drinking were associated with greater startle potentiation to unpredictable threat. In Study 2, hazardous drinking scores were also positively associated with startle potentiation to predictable threat.
The findings are notably consistent with the notion that heightened reactivity to uncertain threat is an important individual difference factor associated with the onset and/or maintenance of problematic drinking behaviors and may therefore be a novel prevention and intervention target.
近期的实验室研究表明,急性酒精中毒能选择性且有效地抑制对不确定威胁的厌恶反应。一个新出现的假说是,对不确定威胁表现出更高反应性的个体可能特别有动机使用酒精来减轻他们的痛苦,从而为负强化过程驱动过度饮酒创造了条件。然而,迄今为止尚无研究直接检验当前有饮酒问题的人是否如预期那样对不确定威胁表现出更高的反应性。
因此,本研究旨在检验两个独立样本中当前有问题的酒精使用与清醒状态下对不确定威胁的反应性之间的关联。在研究1(n = 221)和研究2(n = 74)中,成年参与者完成了相同的经过充分验证的电击威胁任务,该任务分别探测对时间上可预测和不可预测威胁的反应。惊吓增强被测量为厌恶反应的一个指标。在研究1中,有问题的酒精使用被定义为过去30天内的暴饮发作次数,在研究2中则被定义为自我报告的危险饮酒测量的总分。
如所假设的那样,在两项研究中饮酒问题程度越高,与对不可预测威胁的惊吓增强越大相关。在研究2中,危险饮酒得分也与对可预测威胁的惊吓增强呈正相关。
这些发现显著地与以下观点一致,即对不确定威胁的更高反应性是与有问题饮酒行为的发生和/或维持相关的一个重要个体差异因素,因此可能是一个新的预防和干预目标。