Wang Tiantian, Du Lin, Shan Ling, Dong Hanyu, Feng Junyan, Kiessling Maren C, Angstman Nicholas B, Schmitz Christoph, Jia Feiyong
From the Department of Pediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation (TW, LD, LS, HD, JF, FJ) ; the Institute of Pediatrics (FJ), First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; the Neurological Research Center (FJ), First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; and the Extracorporeal Shock Wave Research Unit (MCK, NBA, CS), Department of Neuroanatomy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(19):e3649. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003649.
To assess the effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) on plantar flexor muscle spasticity and gross motor function in very young patients with cerebral palsy (CP).The design was case-control study (level of evidence 3).The setting was the Department of Pediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.Those with a diagnosis of CP and spastic plantar flexor muscles were recruited between April 2014 and April 2015.According to the parents' decision, patients received 1 ESWT session per week for 3 months, with 1500 radial shock waves per ESWT session and leg with positive energy flux density of 0.03 mJ/mm, combined with traditional conservative therapy (rESWT group) or traditional conservative therapy alone (control group).The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (primary outcome measure) and passive range of motion (pROM) measurements were collected at baseline (BL), 1 month (M1), and 3 months (M3) after BL. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 was collected at BL and M3.Sixty-six patients completed the final review at 3 months and were included in the study. Subjects ranged in age from 12 to 60 months (mean age 27.0 ± 13.6 months; median age 22.0 months; 33.3% female). For the rESWT group (n = 34), mean MAS grades at BL, M1, and M3 were 2.6, 1.9, and 1.5 on the left side and 1.9, 1.7, and 1.2 on the right side. For the control group (n = 32), mean MAS grades at BL, M1, and M3 were 2.5, 2.4, and 2.1 on the left side and 1.8, 1.8, and 1.5 on the right side. The within-subject effects time × side and time × treatment were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Similar results were found for the improvement of mean pROM. GMFM-88 improved from BL to M3, but showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. There were no significant complications.This study demonstrates that the combination of rESWT and traditional conservative therapy is more effective than traditional conservative therapy alone in the treatment of spasticity in very young patients with CP.
评估桡侧体外冲击波疗法(rESWT)对脑瘫(CP)极年幼患者跖屈肌痉挛和粗大运动功能的影响。研究设计为病例对照研究(证据级别3)。研究地点为中国长春吉林大学第一医院小儿神经内科与神经康复科。2014年4月至2015年4月期间招募诊断为CP且伴有痉挛性跖屈肌的患者。根据家长的决定,患者每周接受1次ESWT治疗,共3个月,每次ESWT治疗施加1500次桡侧冲击波,腿部正能量通量密度为0.03 mJ/mm²,联合传统保守治疗(rESWT组)或仅接受传统保守治疗(对照组)。在基线(BL)、BL后1个月(M1)和3个月(M3)收集改良Ashworth量表(MAS)(主要结局指标)和被动活动范围(pROM)测量值。在BL和M3收集粗大运动功能测量量表(GMFM)-88。66例患者在3个月时完成最终评估并纳入研究。受试者年龄范围为12至60个月(平均年龄27.0±13.6个月;中位年龄22.0个月;女性占33.3%)。rESWT组(n = 34)左侧在BL、M1和M3时的平均MAS分级分别为2.6、1.9和1.5,右侧分别为1.9、- 1.7和1.2。对照组(n = 32)左侧在BL、M1和M3时的平均MAS分级分别为2.5、2.4和2.1,右侧分别为1.8、1.8和1.5。受试者内效应时间×侧别和时间×治疗具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。平均pROM改善情况也得到类似结果。GMFM-88从BL到M3有所改善,但两组间无统计学显著差异。未出现显著并发症。本研究表明,rESWT与传统保守治疗联合在治疗CP极年幼患者的痉挛方面比单纯传统保守治疗更有效。