Davies-Thompson Jodie, Johnston Samantha, Tashakkor Yashar, Pancaroglu Raika, Barton Jason J S
Human Vision and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Medicine (Neurology), Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Center of Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy.
Human Vision and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Medicine (Neurology), Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Brain Res. 2016 Aug 1;1644:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 10.
Visual words and faces activate similar networks but with complementary hemispheric asymmetries, faces being lateralized to the right and words to the left. A recent theory proposes that this reflects developmental competition between visual word and face processing. We investigated whether this results in an inverse correlation between the degree of lateralization of visual word and face activation in the fusiform gyri. 26 literate right-handed healthy adults underwent functional MRI with face and word localizers. We derived lateralization indices for cluster size and peak responses for word and face activity in left and right fusiform gyri, and correlated these across subjects. A secondary analysis examined all face- and word-selective voxels in the inferior occipitotemporal cortex. No negative correlations were found. There were positive correlations for the peak MR response between word and face activity within the left hemisphere, and between word activity in the left visual word form area and face activity in the right fusiform face area. The face lateralization index was positively rather than negatively correlated with the word index. In summary, we do not find a complementary relationship between visual word and face lateralization across subjects. The significance of the positive correlations is unclear: some may reflect the influences of general factors such as attention, but others may point to other factors that influence lateralization of function.
视觉单词和面孔激活相似的神经网络,但具有互补的半球不对称性,面孔在右侧半球更具优势,而单词在左侧半球更具优势。最近的一种理论认为,这反映了视觉单词和面孔加工之间的发育竞争。我们研究了这是否会导致梭状回中视觉单词和面孔激活的偏侧化程度之间呈负相关。26名识字的右利手健康成年人接受了使用面孔和单词定位器的功能磁共振成像检查。我们得出了左右梭状回中单词和面孔活动的簇大小和峰值反应的偏侧化指数,并在受试者之间进行了相关性分析。二次分析检查了枕颞叶下部皮质中所有面孔和单词选择性体素。未发现负相关。左半球内单词和面孔活动之间、左视觉单词形式区域的单词活动和右梭状面孔区域的面孔活动之间的峰值磁共振反应呈正相关。面孔偏侧化指数与单词指数呈正相关而非负相关。总之,我们没有发现受试者之间视觉单词和面孔偏侧化之间存在互补关系。正相关的意义尚不清楚:一些可能反映了诸如注意力等一般因素的影响,但其他因素可能指向影响功能偏侧化的其他因素。