• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The 'visibility' of unpaid care in England.英国无偿护理的“可见性”。
J Soc Work (Lond). 2016 May;16(3):263-282. doi: 10.1177/1468017315569645. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
2
Perceptions of unmet needs for community social care services in England. A comparison of working carers and the people they care for.对英格兰社区社会护理服务未满足需求的认知。在职护理人员与其所照顾对象的比较。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):435-446. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12323. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
3
The Effectiveness of Paid Services in Supporting Unpaid Carers' Employment in England.付费服务对支持英格兰无偿护理人员就业的有效性。
J Soc Policy. 2015 Jul;44(3):567-590. doi: 10.1017/S0047279415000069.
4
Ambiguity in practice? Carers' roles in personalised social care in England.实践中的模糊性?英国护理人员在个性化社会护理中的角色。
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):23-32. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12123. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
5
Longitudinal analysis of local government spending on adult social care and carers' subjective well-being in England.对英格兰地区政府用于成人社会关怀和护理人员主观幸福感支出的纵向分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e049652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049652.
6
Reaching out or missing out: approaches to outreach with family carers in social care organisations.主动接触还是错失机会:社会护理组织中与家庭照顾者开展外展工作的方法
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12119. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
7
Voices of unpaid carers: problems and prospects in accessing palliative care and self-care information, resources and services.无偿护理者的心声:获取姑息治疗以及自我护理信息、资源和服务方面的问题与前景
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 May 29;18:26323524241255386. doi: 10.1177/26323524241255386. eCollection 2024.
8
Carers of older people with dementia: assessment and the Carers Act.老年痴呆症患者的护理者:评估与《护理者法案》
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 May;9(3):151-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00291.x.
9
Development of a Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: a qualitative study.开发一种用于家庭临终关怀实践的照顾者支持需求评估工具(CSNAT):一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;27(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0269216312440607. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
10
The role of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool in palliative home care: A qualitative study of practitioners' perspectives of its impact and mechanisms of action.护理者支持需求评估工具在姑息家庭护理中的作用:一项关于从业者对其影响和作用机制看法的定性研究
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):392-400. doi: 10.1177/0269216315596662. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The BREATHE Project, a mobile application, video-monitoring system in family homes as an aid to the caring role: Needs, acceptability and concerns of informal carers.BREATHE项目,一款移动应用程序,用于家庭中的视频监控系统,以辅助护理工作:非正式护理人员的需求、可接受性和担忧。
Digit Health. 2018 Jun 5;4:2055207618780470. doi: 10.1177/2055207618780470. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
2
Making sense of the shadows: priorities for creating a learning healthcare system based on routinely collected data.解读这些阴影:基于常规收集数据创建学习型医疗体系的优先事项。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):505-15. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004278. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The demographic characteristics and economic activity patterns of carers over 50: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.50岁以上护理人员的人口特征和经济活动模式:来自英国老龄化纵向研究的证据。
Popul Trends. 2010 Autumn(141):51-73. doi: 10.1057/pt.2010.21.
2
The chicken or the egg? Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England.鸡生蛋还是蛋生鸡?英国非正式护理人员劳动力市场参与中的内生性问题。
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):536-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
3
Who cares? Geographic variation in unpaid caregiving in England and Wales: evidence from the 2001 census.谁在乎呢?英格兰和威尔士无偿照料的地域差异:来自2001年人口普查的证据。
Popul Trends. 2005 Summer(120):23-34.
4
Trends in informal care in Great Britain during the 1990s.20世纪90年代英国非正式护理的趋势。
Health Soc Care Community. 2001 Nov;9(6):348-57. doi: 10.1046/j.0966-0410.2001.00313.x.

英国无偿护理的“可见性”。

The 'visibility' of unpaid care in England.

作者信息

Pickard Linda, King Derek, Knapp Martin

机构信息

London School of Economics and Political Science, England.

出版信息

J Soc Work (Lond). 2016 May;16(3):263-282. doi: 10.1177/1468017315569645. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1177/1468017315569645
PMID:27182201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4847125/
Abstract

SUMMARY

Social work practice is increasingly concerned with support not just for service users but also for unpaid carers. A key aspect of practice is the assessment of carers' needs. The Government has recently passed legislation that will widen eligibility for carers' assessments and remove the requirement that carers must be providing a substantial amount of care on a regular basis. This article examines which carers are currently 'visible' or known to councils and which are not, and uses the results to examine the likely effects of the new legislation. In order to identify the characteristics of carers known to councils, the article uses large-scale surveys, comparing the 2009/10 Personal Social Services Survey of Adult Carers in England and the 2009/10 Survey of Carers in Households in England.

FINDINGS

Carers who are known to councils provide extremely long hours of care. Among carers providing substantial care who are known to councils, the majority care for 100 or more hours a week. The focus of councils on carers providing long hours of care is associated with a number of other carer characteristics, such as poor health.

APPLICATIONS

Councils' emphasis on the most intense carers is unlikely to be attributable solely to the current legislation. Therefore, dropping the substantial and regular clauses alone will not necessarily broaden access to carers' assessments and, in order to achieve this, considerable new resources may be needed. How far these resources are available will determine the extent to which practitioners can broaden access to carers' assessments.

摘要

摘要

社会工作实践越来越关注不仅为服务使用者提供支持,也为无偿照顾者提供支持。实践的一个关键方面是对照顾者需求的评估。政府最近通过了一项立法,该立法将扩大照顾者评估的资格范围,并取消照顾者必须定期提供大量照顾的要求。本文研究了哪些照顾者目前在地方议会中是“可见的”或已知的,哪些不是,并利用研究结果来考察新立法可能产生的影响。为了确定地方议会已知的照顾者的特征,本文使用了大规模调查,比较了2009/10年度英格兰成年照顾者个人社会服务调查和2009/10年度英格兰家庭照顾者调查。

研究结果

地方议会已知的照顾者提供的照顾时间极长。在地方议会已知的提供大量照顾的照顾者中,大多数人每周照顾100小时或更长时间。地方议会对提供长时间照顾的照顾者的关注与许多其他照顾者特征相关,比如健康状况不佳。

应用

地方议会对最投入的照顾者的强调不太可能仅仅归因于现行立法。因此,仅取消大量和定期条款不一定会扩大照顾者评估的获取范围,为了实现这一点,可能需要大量新资源。这些资源的可获取程度将决定从业者能够在多大程度上扩大照顾者评估的获取范围。