Suppr超能文献

关于门诊医生使用健康信息技术以及参与医疗服务提供改革项目的全国性调查结果。

National findings regarding health IT use and participation in health care delivery reform programs among office-based physicians.

作者信息

Heisey-Grove Dawn, Patel Vaishali

机构信息

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):130-139. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw065. Epub 2016 May 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to characterize physicians' participation in delivery and payment reform programs over time and describe how participants in these programs were using health information technology (IT) to coordinate care, engage patients, manage patient populations, and improve quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nationally representative cohort of physicians was surveyed in 2012 (unweighted N = 2567) and 2013 (unweighted N = 2399). Regression analyses used those survey responses to identify associations between health IT use and participation in and attrition from patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), accountable care organizations (ACOs), and pay-for-performance programs (P4Ps).

RESULTS

In 2013, 45% of physicians participated in PCMHs, ACOs, or P4Ps. While participation in each program increased (P < .05) between 2012 and 2013, program attrition ranged from 31-40%. Health IT use was associated with greater program participation (RR = 1.07-1.16). PCMH, ACO, and P4P participants were more likely than nonparticipants to perform quality improvement and patient engagement activities electronically (RR = 1.09-1.14); only ACO participants were more likely to share information electronically (RR = 1.07-1.09).

DISCUSSION

Participation in delivery and payment reform programs increased between 2012 and 2013. Participating physicians were more likely to use health IT. There was significant attrition from and switching between PCMHs, ACOs, and P4Ps.

CONCLUSION

This work provides the basis for understanding physician participation in and attrition from delivery and payment reform programs, as well as how health IT was used to support those programs. Understanding health IT use by program participants may help to identify factors enabling a smooth transition to alternative payment models.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是描述医生随时间推移参与医疗服务与支付改革项目的情况,并阐述这些项目的参与者如何利用健康信息技术(IT)来协调医疗服务、促进患者参与、管理患者群体以及提高医疗质量。

材料与方法

2012年(未加权N = 2567)和2013年(未加权N = 2399)对一个具有全国代表性的医生队列进行了调查。回归分析利用这些调查回复来确定健康信息技术的使用与参与以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)、 accountable care organizations(ACO)以及按绩效付费项目(P4P)之间的关联,以及从这些项目中的退出情况。

结果

2013年,45%的医生参与了PCMH、ACO或P4P。虽然2012年至2013年间每个项目的参与率都有所提高(P < 0.05),但项目退出率在31%至40%之间。健康信息技术的使用与更高的项目参与度相关(相对风险RR = 1.07 - 1.16)。PCMH、ACO和P4P的参与者比非参与者更有可能以电子方式开展质量改进和患者参与活动(RR = 1.09 - 1.14);只有ACO参与者更有可能以电子方式共享信息(RR = 1.07 - 1.09)。

讨论

2012年至2013年间,参与医疗服务与支付改革项目的情况有所增加。参与项目的医生更有可能使用健康信息技术。PCMH、ACO和P4P之间存在显著的退出和转换情况。

结论

这项工作为理解医生参与医疗服务与支付改革项目的情况以及退出情况,以及健康信息技术如何用于支持这些项目提供了基础。了解项目参与者对健康信息技术的使用情况可能有助于识别促进向替代支付模式平稳过渡的因素。

相似文献

1
National findings regarding health IT use and participation in health care delivery reform programs among office-based physicians.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):130-139. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw065. Epub 2016 May 16.
4
Physicians in ACOs report greater documentation burden.
Am J Manag Care. 2024 May;30(6 Spec No.):SP452-SP458. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89552.
5
Financial Incentives and Physician Practice Participation in Medicare's Value-Based Reforms.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3052-3069. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12743. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
Longitudinal participation in delivery and payment reform programs among US Primary Care Organizations.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):47-55. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13646. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
9
ACOs, PCMHs, and health care reform: nursing's next frontier?
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2011 May;12(2):100-3. doi: 10.1177/1527154411416370. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
10
Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Four States: Implementation and Early Impacts.
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):583-619. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12386. Epub 2019 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Primary Care Engagement in Value-Based Reform Programs With Health Services Outcomes: Participation and Synergies.
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Feb 25;3(2):e220005. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0005. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Longitudinal participation in delivery and payment reform programs among US Primary Care Organizations.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):47-55. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13646. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
5
The patient-centered dental home: A standardized definition for quality assessment, improvement, and integration.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):446-454. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13067. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Primary Care Practices' Abilities And Challenges In Using Electronic Health Record Data For Quality Improvement.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Apr;37(4):635-643. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254.

本文引用的文献

2
Physician and Practice-Level Drivers and Disparities around Meaningful Use Progress.
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):244-267. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12481. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Paying physician group practices for quality: A statewide quasi-experiment.
Healthc (Amst). 2013 Dec;1(3-4):108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 May 28.
6
Performance differences in year 1 of pioneer accountable care organizations.
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1927-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1414929. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Michigan's fee-for-value physician incentive program reduces spending and improves quality in primary care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):645-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0426.
8
Setting value-based payment goals--HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 5;372(10):897-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500445. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
9
Pay-for-performance schemes that use patient and provider categories would reduce payment disparities.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):134-42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0386.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验