• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险基于价值的改革中经济激励与医生执业参与度。

Financial Incentives and Physician Practice Participation in Medicare's Value-Based Reforms.

机构信息

Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3052-3069. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12743. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12743
PMID:28748535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6056599/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether greater experience and success with performance incentives among physician practices are related to increased participation in Medicare's voluntary value-based payment reforms.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Publicly available data from Medicare's Physician Compare (n = 1,278; January 2012 to November 2013) and nationally representative physician practice data from the National Survey of Physician Organizations 3 (NSPO3; n = 907,538; 2013).

STUDY DESIGN

We used regression analysis to examine practice-level relationships between prior exposure to performance incentives and participation in key Medicare value-based payment reforms: accountable care organization (ACO) programs, the Physician Quality Reporting System ("Physician Compare"), and the Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology program ("Meaningful Use"). Prior experience and success with financial incentives were measured as (1) the percentage of practices' revenue from financial incentives for quality or efficiency; and (2) practices' exposure to public reporting of quality measures.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We linked physician participation data from Medicare's Physician Compare to the NSPO3 survey.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There was wide variation in practices' exposure to performance incentives, with 64 percent exposed to financial incentives, 45 percent exposed to public reporting, and 2.2 percent of practice revenue coming from financial incentives. For each percentage-point increase in financial incentives, there was a 0.9 percentage-point increase in the probability of participating in ACOs (standard error [SE], 0.1, p < .001) and a 0.8 percentage-point increase in the probability of participating in Meaningful Use (SE, 0.1, p < .001), controlling for practice characteristics. Financial incentives were not associated with participation in Physician Compare. Among ACO participants, a 1 percentage-point increase in incentives was associated with a 0.7 percentage-point increase in the probability of being "very well" prepared to utilize cost and quality data (SE, 0.1, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians organizations' prior experience and success with performance incentives were related to participation in Medicare ACO arrangements and participation in the meaningful use criteria but not to participation in Physician Compare. We conclude that Medicare must complement financial incentives with additional efforts to address the needs of practices with less experience with such incentives to promote value-based payment on a broader scale.

摘要

目的

评估医生实践中与绩效激励相关的更多经验和成功是否与参与医疗保险的自愿基于价值的支付改革有关。

数据来源/研究环境:医疗保险的医生比较(n=1278;2012 年 1 月至 2013 年 11 月)和全国医师组织调查 3(NSPO3;n=907538;2013 年)中公开可用的数据。

研究设计

我们使用回归分析检查了绩效激励之前的暴露程度与参与医疗保险的关键基于价值的支付改革之间的实践水平关系:责任制医疗组织(ACO)计划、医师质量报告系统(“医生比较”)和使用健康信息技术的有意义计划(“有意义的使用”)。先前的财务激励经验和成功被衡量为(1)实践从质量或效率的财务激励中获得的收入百分比;和(2)实践对质量措施公开报告的暴露程度。

数据收集/提取方法:我们将医疗保险的医生比较中的医生参与数据与 NSPO3 调查联系起来。

主要发现

实践暴露于绩效激励措施的情况差异很大,有 64%的实践受到财务激励的影响,45%的实践受到公开报告的影响,2.2%的实践收入来自财务激励。每增加一个百分点的财务激励,参与 ACO 的概率就会增加 0.9 个百分点(标准误差 [SE],0.1,p<0.001),参与有意义使用的概率增加 0.8 个百分点(SE,0.1,p<0.001),控制了实践特征。财务激励与参与医生比较无关。在 ACO 参与者中,激励措施增加 1 个百分点与准备使用成本和质量数据的“非常好”的可能性增加 0.7 个百分点(SE,0.1,p<0.001)相关。

结论

医师组织在绩效激励方面的先前经验和成功与参与医疗保险 ACO 安排以及参与有意义的使用标准有关,但与参与医生比较无关。我们的结论是,医疗保险必须通过额外的努力来补充财务激励措施,以解决经验较少的实践需求,以更广泛地促进基于价值的支付。

相似文献

1
Financial Incentives and Physician Practice Participation in Medicare's Value-Based Reforms.医疗保险基于价值的改革中经济激励与医生执业参与度。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3052-3069. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12743. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
2
Determinants of success in Shared Savings Programs: An analysis of ACO and market characteristics.共享储蓄计划成功的决定因素:对 ACO 和市场特征的分析。
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Mar;5(1-2):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Association Between Hospitals' Engagement in Value-Based Reforms and Readmission Reduction in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program.医院参与基于价值的改革与“降低医院再入院计划”中的再入院率降低之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):862-868. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0518.
4
Salary and Quality Compensation for Physician Practices Participating in Accountable Care Organizations.参与责任医疗组织的医生执业机构的薪酬与质量补偿
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;13(4):321-4. doi: 10.1370/afm.1805.
5
Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data.在问责制医疗组织中,医生更有可能收集和使用医生绩效信息,但只有一小部分薪酬是基于绩效数据的。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54(6):1214-1222. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13238.
6
Longitudinal participation in delivery and payment reform programs among US Primary Care Organizations.美国初级保健组织参与分娩和支付改革计划的纵向研究。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):47-55. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13646. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
7
Medicare's physician quality reporting initiative: incentives, physician work, and perceived impact on patient care.医疗保险医生质量报告倡议:激励措施、医生工作以及对患者护理的感知影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Jun;7(6):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.12.011.
8
Improving Care Transitions Management: Examining the Role of Accountable Care Organization Participation and Expanded Electronic Health Record Functionality.改善护理转接管理:审视负责医疗组织参与及扩展电子健康记录功能的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1494-1510. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12546. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
9
Physician Practice Leaders' Perceptions of Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS).医师实践领导者对医疗保险基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3752-3758. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06758-w. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Optimization of Medication Use at Accountable Care Organizations.优化问责制医疗组织中的药物使用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1054-1064. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1054.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth and plastic surgery: evaluation of the accessibility of virtual consultations through online resources.远程医疗与整形手术:通过在线资源对虚拟会诊可及性的评估
Mhealth. 2025 Jun 25;11:33. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-24-77. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical Staff Perceptions of Pay-for-Performance Financial Incentives for HPV Vaccine Promotion.临床工作人员对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗推广绩效薪酬激励措施的看法。
Am J Med Qual. 2024;39(6):267-274. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000207. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
3
Implementation of a Machine Learning Risk Prediction Model for Postpartum Depression in the Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录中产后抑郁症机器学习风险预测模型的实施
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2024 Oct 21;2024:1057-1066. eCollection 2024.
4
Physician descriptions of the influence of pay for performance on medical decision-making.医生对绩效薪酬对医疗决策影响的描述。
Health Policy Open. 2021 Feb 17;2:100036. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100036. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Health Information Technology and Accountable Care Organizations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.健康信息技术与可问责医疗组织:系统综述及未来方向
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 8;7(1):24. doi: 10.5334/egems.261.
6
Performance in the Medicare Shared Savings Program After Accounting for Nonrandom Exit: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.在考虑非随机退出因素后,医疗保险共享储蓄计划中的表现:一项工具变量分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):27-36. doi: 10.7326/M18-2539. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
7
Practices Caring For The Underserved Are Less Likely To Adopt Medicare's Annual Wellness Visit.为服务不足人群提供护理的做法不太可能采用医疗保险的年度健康访视。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Feb;37(2):283-291. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1130.

本文引用的文献

1
More Than Money: Motivating Physician Behavior Change in Accountable Care Organizations.不止于金钱:推动责任医疗组织中的医生行为改变
Milbank Q. 2016 Dec;94(4):832-861. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12230.
2
Physicians' Participation In ACOs Is Lower In Places With Vulnerable Populations Than In More Affluent Communities.在弱势群体较多的地区,医生参与负责医疗组织(ACO)的比例低于富裕社区。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1382-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1635.
3
Assessing Differences between Early and Later Adopters of Accountable Care Organizations Using Taxonomic Analysis.使用分类分析评估责任医疗组织早期和晚期采用者之间的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51(6):2318-2329. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12473. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
Strong versus Weak Incentives: The Role of Policy, Management, and Theory in a New Research Agenda.强激励与弱激励:政策、管理和理论在新研究议程中的作用
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2223-8. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12412.
5
Driven to Care: Aligning External Motivators with Intrinsic Motivation.因关爱而驱动:使外部激励因素与内在动机保持一致。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2216-22. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12422.
6
Introduction. Apple Pickers or Federal Judges: Strong versus Weak Incentives in Physician Payment.引言。苹果采摘工还是联邦法官:医生薪酬中的强激励与弱激励
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2049-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12424.
7
Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?绩效薪酬:令人失望的结果还是隐藏的异质性?
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Feb;74(1):3-78. doi: 10.1177/1077558715619282. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Stakeholder-Driven Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Update From PCORI.利益相关者驱动的比较效果研究:PCORI的最新进展。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2235-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15139.
9
How Financial and Reputational Incentives Can Be Used to Improve Medical Care.如何利用经济和声誉激励措施改善医疗服务。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2090-115. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12419. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Beyond Measurement and Reward: Methods of Motivating Quality Improvement and Accountability.超越衡量与奖励:激励质量改进与问责的方法。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2155-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12413. Epub 2015 Nov 10.