• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)手动搬运指南的评估,特别涉及水平距离。

An evaluation of the NIOSH guidelines for manual lifting, with special reference to horizontal distance.

作者信息

Garg A

机构信息

Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 53201.

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1989 Mar;50(3):157-64. doi: 10.1080/15298668991374453.

DOI:10.1080/15298668991374453
PMID:2718909
Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted to determine the percentage of subjects capable of lifting loads at the maximum permissible limit (MPL) and the corresponding energy expenditure, heart rate, compressive force on the L5/S1 disc, and ratings of perceived exertion. A second objective was to compare MPLs based on measured horizontal distances with those based on the rule of thumb proposed in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) guide (H = 15 + w/2 cm). Thirteen male subjects were required to lift three different boxes (25, 38, and 51 cm wide) at four different frequencies (0.2, 3, 6, and 9 lifts/min) and at two heights (floor level to bench height [0.8 m] and bench height to 1.5 m). Each lift was performed for 1 hr, and horizontal distances for all 13 subjects were measured at the origin of the lifts. MPLs were computed for all lifting tasks. A psychophysical method was used to determine the maximum acceptable weight of a lift. This weight, however, was not allowed to exceed the corresponding MPL. Maximum acceptable weights for all 13 subjects were equal to the MPLs. Of 13 subjects, 9 indicated that they could lift weights significantly greater than the MPLs. MPLs for the bench to 1.5-m height were significantly greater than the corresponding MPLs for the floor to 0.8-m height. The mean heart rate for 1-hr lifting tasks ranged from 104 to 114 beats/min. The estimated compressive force on the L5/S1 disc ranged from 340 to 598 kg. The mean ratings of perceived exertion for floor level to bench height and bench height to 1.5-m lifts were 12 and 9.6 for the back and 9.3 and 13 for the shoulder, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

进行了一项实验室研究,以确定能够以最大允许限度(MPL)提起重物的受试者百分比,以及相应的能量消耗、心率、L5/S1椎间盘上的压力和自觉用力程度评级。第二个目标是将基于测量水平距离的最大允许限度与美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)指南中提出的经验法则(H = 15 + w/2厘米)得出的最大允许限度进行比较。要求13名男性受试者以四种不同频率(0.2、3、6和9次/分钟)和两种高度(从地面到工作台高度[0.8米]以及从工作台高度到1.5米)提起三个不同宽度(25、38和51厘米)的箱子。每次提起持续1小时,并在提起起点测量所有13名受试者的水平距离。计算所有提起任务的最大允许限度。使用心理物理学方法确定一次提起的最大可接受重量。然而,该重量不得超过相应的最大允许限度。所有13名受试者的最大可接受重量均等于最大允许限度。在13名受试者中,有9人表示他们能够提起明显大于最大允许限度的重量。从工作台到1.5米高度的最大允许限度明显大于从地面到0.8米高度的相应最大允许限度。1小时提起任务的平均心率范围为104至114次/分钟。L5/S1椎间盘上的估计压力范围为340至598千克。从地面到工作台高度以及从工作台高度到1.5米提起的自觉用力程度平均评级,背部分别为12和9.6,肩部分别为9.3和13。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the NIOSH guidelines for manual lifting, with special reference to horizontal distance.对美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)手动搬运指南的评估,特别涉及水平距离。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1989 Mar;50(3):157-64. doi: 10.1080/15298668991374453.
2
The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.中国受试者的心理物理学举重能力。
Ergonomics. 1995 Apr;38(4):671-83. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925139.
3
The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.容器尺寸、频率和水平伸展距离对女性产业工人最大可接受提举重量的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2007 Jan;38(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
4
Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.使用对下背部压力的主观评估和生物力学评估来评估举重任务。
Ergonomics. 1991 Jan;34(1):33-47. doi: 10.1080/00140139108967286.
5
[Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].[手动搬运任务的最大可接受搬运重量]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2006 Apr;24(4):194-7.
6
Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.举重频率和技术对身体疲劳的影响,特别提及心理物理学方法和代谢率。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1979 Oct;40(10):894-503. doi: 10.1080/15298667991430460.
7
Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.箱子尺寸、举重频率和举重高度对伊朗男大学生最大可接受举重重量和心率的影响。
Electron Physician. 2015 Oct 19;7(6):1365-71. doi: 10.14661/2015.1365. eCollection 2015 Oct.
8
Maximum acceptable weight of lift by Chinese experienced male manual handlers.中国有经验的男性体力劳动者的最大可接受搬运重量。
Appl Ergon. 1997 Aug;28(4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(96)00080-4.
9
A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.等速提升力量与静态力量以及最大可接受重量的比较,特别提及提升速度。
Ergonomics. 1994 Aug;37(8):1363-74. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964915.
10
Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.用于手动搬运任务设计与评估的经修订的美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)公式。
Ergonomics. 1993 Jul;36(7):749-76. doi: 10.1080/00140139308967940.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain.研究方案标题:一项腰痛的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 7;14:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-84.
2
Perceived exertion. Antecedents and applications.自觉用力程度。前因与应用。
Sports Med. 1993 Apr;15(4):225-41. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199315040-00002.