Ram Bapurapu Raja, Goud Vallabhdas Srinivas, Kumar Dodda Ramesh, Reddy Bande Karunakar, Boda Kumara Swamy, Madipeddi Venkanna
Associate Professor, Deparment of General Surgery, Mahathma Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Kakatiya Medical College , Warangal, Talangana, India .
Professor, Deparment of General Surgery, Mahathma Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Kakatiya Medical College , Warangal, Talangana, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):PC04-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18037.7613. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
The available classical approaches for Groin hernia are multiple. The change of approach with change of incision is needed with these approaches when the bowel is gangrenous.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new approach for all strangulated groin hernias (inguinal, femoral and obturator), in terms of change of approach/complications.
It was conducted in surgical unit-2 of MGM Hospital, Kakatiya Medical College Warangal, Telangana State, India, from Nov 2000 to Oct 2010. Total 52 patients operated with classical approach were compared with 52 patients operated present new approach. All the cases (52+52) were with gangrenous bowel which required resection and end to end anastomosis of bowel. All the cases (52+52) were managed with mesh repair and the results were analysed.
In classical approach: Three cases required laparotomy (5.7%). Twelve cases required change of approach with change of incision (23%). Eight cases developed wound infection after mesh repair (15%). Four cases required removal of mesh (7.6%). Two Cases developed recurrence (3.8%). In present new approach: No laparotomy (0%), no change of incision (0%), no removal of mesh (0%) and no recurrence(0%). Only 2 cases (3.8%) developed wound infection at lateral part of incision ie. p<0.05.
This new approach for all - gives a best approach for strangulated groin hernias as it is easy to follow. It obviates the change of incision and need for a laparotomy. It further retains normal anatomy, prevents contamination of the inguinal canal and permits a mesh repair leading to decreasing the chances of recurrence.
腹股沟疝可用的传统方法有多种。当肠管发生坏疽时,采用这些方法需要随着切口的改变而改变手术入路。
从手术入路的改变/并发症方面评估一种新方法用于所有绞窄性腹股沟疝(腹股沟疝、股疝和闭孔疝)的有效性和安全性。
该研究于2000年11月至2010年10月在印度特伦甘纳邦瓦朗加尔卡卡提亚医学院MGM医院的第二外科进行。将52例采用传统方法手术的患者与52例采用新方法手术的患者进行比较。所有病例(52 + 52)均有肠管坏疽,需要进行肠切除和端端吻合。所有病例(52 + 52)均采用补片修补,并对结果进行分析。
在传统方法中:3例需要开腹手术(5.7%)。12例需要随着切口改变而改变手术入路(23%)。8例在补片修补后发生伤口感染(15%)。4例需要取出补片(7.6%)。2例发生复发(3.8%)。在新方法中:无开腹手术(0%),无切口改变(0%),无补片取出(0%)且无复发(0%)。仅2例(3.8%)在切口外侧发生伤口感染,即p < 0.05。
这种针对所有绞窄性腹股沟疝的新方法是一种最佳方法,因为它易于操作。它避免了切口改变和开腹手术的需要。它进一步保留了正常解剖结构,防止腹股沟管污染,并允许进行补片修补,从而降低了复发几率。