Suppr超能文献

对佩戴假牙且疑似迟发型超敏反应患者的牙科材料系列进行评估。

Evaluation of dental material series from patients with dental prostheses and suspicion of delayed hypersensitivity.

作者信息

Yoshimura Fernanda Cortinhas, Cunha Victor do Espirito Santo, Hahnstadt Ruppert Ludwig, Pires Mário Cezar

机构信息

Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Clínica privada - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

An Bras Dermatol. 2016 Apr;91(2):141-8. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164116.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with oral sensitivity are common in our practice. Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most frequent etiologies.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate oral contact dermatitis using the Brazilian standard series and complementary dental series in patients using dental prostheses, with or without oral complaints. Determine specific dental Brazilian series.

METHODS

Patients using dental prostheses with or without oral complaints realized patch tests. Brazilian standard series and complementary dental series were used according to ICDRG recommendations. The results were analysed according to age, sex, race, atopic conditions and symptoms associated.

RESULTS

From 54 patients tested, 34 (63%) were positive at least to one substance. Nineteen had oral complaints, such as burning mouth, itch or oral erythema. There was no association between atopic condition and tests results. Without the oral series, just 23(42,6%) patients had a positive result. Using the Brazilian standard series with the complementary dental series we improved the positivity of the patch test to 47%.

CONCLUSION

In patients using prostheses and with oral complaints, patch tests with Brazilian standard series with complementary dental series improve the tests positivity.

摘要

背景

在我们的临床实践中,口腔敏感患者很常见。过敏性接触性皮炎是最常见的病因之一。

目的

使用巴西标准系列和补充牙科系列对使用假牙的患者(无论有无口腔不适)进行口腔接触性皮炎评估。确定巴西特定牙科系列。

方法

使用假牙的患者(无论有无口腔不适)进行斑贴试验。根据国际接触性皮炎研究组(ICDRG)的建议使用巴西标准系列和补充牙科系列。根据年龄、性别、种族、特应性状况和相关症状对结果进行分析。

结果

在54名接受测试的患者中,34名(63%)至少对一种物质呈阳性反应。19名患者有口腔不适,如口腔烧灼感、瘙痒或口腔红斑。特应性状况与测试结果之间无关联。不使用口腔系列时,只有23名(42.6%)患者呈阳性结果。使用巴西标准系列和补充牙科系列时,我们将斑贴试验的阳性率提高到了47%。

结论

对于使用假牙且有口腔不适的患者,使用巴西标准系列和补充牙科系列进行斑贴试验可提高测试阳性率。

相似文献

8
Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.香精系列在眼睑皮炎中的测试。
Dermatitis. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):22-6. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d180f.

本文引用的文献

2
Pitfalls of patch testing with dental materials.牙科材料斑贴试验的陷阱。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Mar;166(3):674-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10605.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
5
Investigation of contact allergy to dental metals in 206 patients.206例患者对牙科金属接触性过敏的调查。
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Jun;60(6):339-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01524.x.
7
Burning mouth syndrome: the role of contact hypersensitivity.灼口综合征:接触性超敏反应的作用
Oral Dis. 2009 May;15(4):255-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01515.x. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
8
Contact allergy in oral disease.口腔疾病中的接触性过敏
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Aug;57(2):315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.04.017. Epub 2007 May 25.
9
Contact dermatitis from benzoyl peroxide in dental prostheses.假牙中过氧化苯甲酰引起的接触性皮炎。
Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Mar;46(3):177-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460312.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验