Lüftenegger Marko, Klug Julia, Harrer Katharina, Langer Marie, Spiel Christiane, Schober Barbara
Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 2;7:603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00603. eCollection 2016.
In the present research, the recently proposed 3 × 2 model of achievement goals is tested and associations with achievement emotions and their joint influence on academic achievement are investigated. The study was conducted with 388 students using the 3 × 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire including the six proposed goal constructs (task-approach, task-avoidance, self-approach, self-avoidance, other-approach, other-avoidance) and the enjoyment and boredom scales from the Achievement Emotion Questionnaire. Exam grades were used as an indicator of academic achievement. Findings from CFAs provided strong support for the proposed structure of the 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Self-based goals, other-based goals and task-approach goals predicted enjoyment. Task-approach goals negatively predicted boredom. Task-approach and other-approach predicted achievement. The indirect effects of achievement goals through emotion variables on achievement were assessed using bias-corrected bootstrapping. No mediation effects were found. Implications for educational practice are discussed.
在本研究中,对最近提出的成就目标3×2模型进行了测试,并调查了其与成就情绪的关联以及它们对学业成绩的共同影响。该研究以388名学生为对象,使用了3×2成就目标问卷,其中包括六个提出的目标结构(任务趋近、任务回避、自我趋近、自我回避、他人趋近、他人回避)以及成就情绪问卷中的愉悦和厌倦量表。考试成绩被用作学业成绩的指标。验证性因素分析的结果为所提出的3×2成就目标模型的结构提供了有力支持。基于自我的目标、基于他人的目标和任务趋近目标预测了愉悦感。任务趋近目标对厌倦感有负向预测作用。任务趋近和他人趋近预测了成绩。使用偏差校正自抽样法评估了成就目标通过情绪变量对成绩的间接影响。未发现中介效应。讨论了对教育实践的启示。